Mouse trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) form colonies of different sizes and morphologies, which might reflect their degrees of differentiation. Therefore, each colony type can have a characteristic gene expression profile; however, the expression levels of internal reference genes may also change, causing fluctuations in their estimated gene expression levels. In this study, we validated seven housekeeping genes by using a geometric averaging method and identified Gapdh as the most stable gene across different colony types. Indeed, when Gapdh was used as the reference, expression levels of Elf5, a TSC marker gene, stringently classified TSC colonies into two groups: a high expression groups consisting of type 1 and 2 colonies, and a lower expression group consisting of type 3 and 4 colonies. This clustering was consistent with our putative classification of undifferentiated/differentiated colonies based on their time-dependent colony transitions. By contrast, use of an unstable reference gene (Rn18s) allowed no such clear classification. Cdx2, another TSC marker, did not show any significant colony type-specific expression pattern irrespective of the reference gene. Selection of stable reference genes for quantitative gene expression analysis might be critical, especially when cell lines consisting of heterogeneous cell populations are used.
Mouse trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) form colonies of different sizes and morphologies, which might reflect their degrees of differentiation. Therefore, each colony type can have a characteristic gene expression profile; however, the expression levels of internal reference genes may also change, causing fluctuations in their estimated gene expression levels. In this study, we validated seven housekeeping genes by using a geometric averaging method and identified Gapdh as the most stable gene across different colony types. Indeed, when Gapdh was used as the reference, expression levels of Elf5, a TSC marker gene, stringently classified TSC colonies into two groups: a high expression groups consisting of type 1 and 2 colonies, and a lower expression group consisting of type 3 and 4 colonies. This clustering was consistent with our putative classification of undifferentiated/differentiated colonies based on their time-dependent colony transitions. By contrast, use of an unstable reference gene (Rn18s) allowed no such clear classification. Cdx2, another TSC marker, did not show any significant colony type-specific expression pattern irrespective of the reference gene. Selection of stable reference genes for quantitative gene expression analysis might be critical, especially when cell lines consisting of heterogeneous cell populations are used.
Trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) are representative of the multipotent trophectoderm, showing extensive self-renewal
ability in the presence of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 4 and heparin [1].
Since the first establishment of TSCs in 1998, they have been widely used in the field of trophoblast study,
providing invaluable information on the mechanisms of trophoblast proliferation and differentiation. However,
unlike their embryonic counterparts—embryonic stem cells—TSCs are inherently prone to spontaneous differentiation
in vitro [2, 3],
and therefore, thought to be heterogeneous and contain both undifferentiated and differentiating trophoblast
cells. Indeed, a few days after passage, TSCs occasionally contain trophoblastic giant cells, a terminally
differentiated form of trophoblast cells. This unstable nature of TSCs results in a time-dependent transition of
their colony morphology, which changes from the primary dome-like shape to a flattened, loose shape within a few
days (types 1–4; see below). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the gene expression profiles of TSC
colonies might reflect their undifferentiated/differentiation status. The colony-dependent changes in the
expression levels of specific TSC marker genes can be traced by reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase
chain reaction (RT-qPCR) amplification. However, the accuracy of the gene expression levels provided by RT-qPCR
highly depends on the selection of appropriate internal reference gene(s). As a matter of fact, commonly used
reference genes are known to modulate their expression levels, in particular between distinct cell and tissue
types [4, 5]. In the present study, we
sought to identify stable reference genes that could be used for RT-qPCR analysis of different types of TSC
colonies. For this purpose, we employed the geNorm algorithm [4, 6] to determine the most stable reference genes from a set of candidate
reference genes in TSC colonies. Using this analysis, a gene-expression normalization factor was calculated for
each sample, based on the geometric mean of a defined number of reference genes.TSC colonies can be classified into four major types depending on their morphology (Fig. 1A): type 1, small, compact and dome-shaped; type 2, compact and flattened; type 3, similar to type 2 but with
loose and multilayered cell clusters in their centers; and type 4, similar to type 3 but with an extensive
multilayered area. There is also an additional type 5, with a sparse monolayered appearance that is observed
rarely in the standard FGF4- and heparin-containing medium (see below). Therefore, this type was not analyzed
here. Our time-lapse live-imaging observations revealed that type 1 colonies appeared predominantly after
passaging, and that a single type 1 colony gave rise to all other types. During these colony transitions, type 2
colonies appeared at an earlier stage, followed by the formation of types 3 and 4. These colony transitions were
mostly irreversible. Thus, we putatively designated types 1 and 2 as undifferentiated and types 3 and 4 as more
differentiated. The proportions of each type appearing from type 1 colonies after passaging are shown in Fig. 1B, illustrating a decrease in type 1 colonies and an increase in types
3 and 4 colonies along time after passaging. We found that another TSC line, EGFP-TS3.5, commonly used
in other TSC studies [7, 8], showed a
colony transition pattern similar to that of B6TS4, except for a relatively smaller population of type 3 colonies
(Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
A: Morphology of TSC colonies in the B6TS4 line. Type 1 colonies were small, compact and dome-shaped; type
2 colonies were compact and flattened; type 3 colonies were similar to type 2 but with loose and
multilayered cell clusters (arrowheads) in their centers; type 4 colonies were similar to type 3 but with an
extensive multilayered area; and type 5 colonies were similar to type 2 but with a sparse monolayered
appearance. Scale bar = 100 μm. B: The percentages of colony types appearing from type 1 colonies after
passaging. The percentages of type 1 colonies decreased while those of type 3 and 4 colonies increased with
time. The same tendency was also found in the EGFP-TS3.5 line, except for a relatively smaller
population of type 3 colonies.
A: Morphology of TSC colonies in the B6TS4 line. Type 1 colonies were small, compact and dome-shaped; type
2 colonies were compact and flattened; type 3 colonies were similar to type 2 but with loose and
multilayered cell clusters (arrowheads) in their centers; type 4 colonies were similar to type 3 but with an
extensive multilayered area; and type 5 colonies were similar to type 2 but with a sparse monolayered
appearance. Scale bar = 100 μm. B: The percentages of colony types appearing from type 1 colonies after
passaging. The percentages of type 1 colonies decreased while those of type 3 and 4 colonies increased with
time. The same tendency was also found in the EGFP-TS3.5 line, except for a relatively smaller
population of type 3 colonies.To determine stable reference genes across different colony types in a mouseTSC line (B6TS4), we calculated the
average expression stability (geNorm M value) with qbasePlus software (Biogazelle, Gent, Belgium)
(Fig. 2A). The reference genes used in the current study are listed in Table
1. The genes with lower M values are considered more stable and 0.5 is the threshold value between
stable and unstable reference genes. Thus, Atp5b, Cyc1, Canx,
Actb, and Gapdh were determined as stable genes. Among these,
Gapdh was the most stable, followed by Actb. Next, we calculated pairwise
variation (V value) by qbasePlus software for determining the optimal number of reference genes. V
values below 0.15 suggest a minimum required number of reference genes for normalization [4]. As a result, we found that a combination of the two most stable genes,
Gapdh and Actb, was sufficient for normalization (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.
A: Ranking of reference genes based on their stability (geNorm M value) provided by geNorm analysis. The
higher geNorm M values (left) indicate lower stability and the lower M values (right) indicate higher
stability. The dotted line indicates 0.5 as the cutoff value. B: This bar chart shows the pairwise variation
(V value) that helps in determining the optimal number of reference genes for normalization. The V value is
calculated between two sequential normalization factors from the most stable gene to the least stable one. A
V value under the 0.15 threshold suggests a minimum required number of reference genes. The black bar
indicates an optimal number of reference targets in this experiment. The dotted line at 0.15 indicates the
threshold V value.
Table 1.
The seven candidate reference genes
Official symbol
Full name
Function
Actb
Actin, beta
One of six different actin isoforms that play important roles in determining cell shape and
controlling cell movement.
Atp5b
ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, beta polypeptide
Mitochondrial ATP synthase catalyzes ATP synthesis, utilizing an electrochemical gradient of protons
across the inner mitochondrial membrane during oxidative phosphorylation.
Canx
Calnexin
A calcium-binding, endoplasmic reticulum associated protein.
Cyc1
Cytochrome C1
A small heme protein that acts in the mitochondrial respiratory chain by transferring electrons from
the Rieske iron–sulfur protein to cytochrome c.
Gapdh
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
An enzyme involved in energy metabolism and in the production of ATP and pyruvate through anaerobic
glycolysis.
Ubc
Ubiquitin C
A polyubiquitin precursor conjugated to target proteins via an isopeptide bond as a
monomer.
Rn18s
18S ribosomal RNA
A part of the ribosomal RNA. Ribosomal RNAs perform critical functions in the ribosome
that allow protein synthesis to occur.
A: Ranking of reference genes based on their stability (geNorm M value) provided by geNorm analysis. The
higher geNorm M values (left) indicate lower stability and the lower M values (right) indicate higher
stability. The dotted line indicates 0.5 as the cutoff value. B: This bar chart shows the pairwise variation
(V value) that helps in determining the optimal number of reference genes for normalization. The V value is
calculated between two sequential normalization factors from the most stable gene to the least stable one. A
V value under the 0.15 threshold suggests a minimum required number of reference genes. The black bar
indicates an optimal number of reference targets in this experiment. The dotted line at 0.15 indicates the
threshold V value.To evaluate the influence of reference genes on the expression profiles of target genes across different colony
types, the mRNA levels of Elf5 (E74-like factor 5) and Cdx2 (caudal-related
homeobox 2), undifferentiated TSC marker genes [9,10,11,12], were
normalized against a single reference gene or combinations of selected reference genes. We chose to analyze these
two genes because Cdx2 is known as the key regulator for specification of the extraembryonic
lineage [13] and Elf5 is essential for the establishment
of TSC lines by sustaining the self-renewal of mouse extraembryonic ectoderm cells [12]. To visualize the gene expression trends, the sample data have been arranged in order of
expression level or plotted within the column corresponding to each colony type using the mean values (Figs. 3 and 4).
Fig. 3.
Relative expressions levels of Elf5 normalized against different reference genes in
colony samples from all four colony types. A: The relative expression levels of Elf5 in
each colony sample are arranged from highest to lowest expression level. The samples were divided into two
groups: an undifferentiated group (types 1 and 2) and a differentiated group (types 3 and 4) when the most
stable reference gene (Gapdh) and the combination of the two most stable reference genes
were used for normalization. However, the normalization with the least stable gene (Rn18s)
resulted in no discrimination among colony types. B: Dot plots showing the Elf5 expression
levels of each sample and the mean values. There were significant differences between types 1 and 4 and
between types 2 and 4, with an exception for the analysis using Rn18s. 7 reference genes,
Rn18s, Ubc, Atp5b, Cyc1,
Canx, Actb, and Gapdh. 2 reference genes,
Actb and Gapdh. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.
Fig. 4.
Relative expression levels of Cdx2 normalized against different reference genes in
samples from all four colony types. A: The relative expression levels of Cdx2 in each
colony sample are arranged from highest to lowest expression level. There were no distinctive colony
type-specific patterns, irrespective of the reference gene used. B: Dot plots showing the
Cdx2 expression levels of each sample and the mean values. There were significant
differences between colony types. Type 1 colony included one exceptionally high sample when
Rn18s was used. 7 reference genes, Rn18s, Ubc,
Atp5b, Cyc1, Canx, Actb, and
Gapdh. 2 reference genes, Actb and Gapdh.
Relative expressions levels of Elf5 normalized against different reference genes in
colony samples from all four colony types. A: The relative expression levels of Elf5 in
each colony sample are arranged from highest to lowest expression level. The samples were divided into two
groups: an undifferentiated group (types 1 and 2) and a differentiated group (types 3 and 4) when the most
stable reference gene (Gapdh) and the combination of the two most stable reference genes
were used for normalization. However, the normalization with the least stable gene (Rn18s)
resulted in no discrimination among colony types. B: Dot plots showing the Elf5 expression
levels of each sample and the mean values. There were significant differences between types 1 and 4 and
between types 2 and 4, with an exception for the analysis using Rn18s. 7 reference genes,
Rn18s, Ubc, Atp5b, Cyc1,
Canx, Actb, and Gapdh. 2 reference genes,
Actb and Gapdh. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.The relative expression levels of Elf5 were divided into two groups when the combination of the
two most reliable genes (Gapdh and Actb) was used for normalization: a higher
expression group consisting of types 1 and 2 colonies and a lower expression group consisting of types 3 and 4
colonies. The same pattern was also obtained with the most stable gene, Gapdh, alone. However,
the pattern was slightly changed with Actb, the second most stable gene, or with all seven
reference genes, some samples switching their positions. With the most unstable gene, Rn18s, the
order became more random (Fig. 3A). When the mean Elf5
expression levels were compared between the colony types, there were significant differences between types 1 and 4
and between types 2 and 4, except when using Rn18s for the analysis (Fig. 3B). Thus, the use of reliable genes as references resulted in putative identification
of undifferentiated colony types (1 and 2) and differentiated colony types (3 and 4) based on the expression
levels of Elf5.We also analyzed the expression levels of Cdx2, another TSC marker gene. When the combination of
both the two most reliable genes was used for normalization, the relative expression levels were intermediate in
types 1 and 2 colonies, and the lowest in type 3 colonies (Fig. 4A). Intriguingly, type 4 colonies were split into higher and lower expression groups. A similar pattern was
obtained when either of these most reliable genes, Gapdh or Actb, were used.
However, when a combination of all seven reference genes or the most unstable gene (Rn18s) was
used, the samples spread more randomly (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, one
extremely high expression sample appeared with the latter. Unlike Elf5, there were no significant
differences in the mean expression levels of Cdx2 between the colony types (Fig. 4B). Use of the unstable Rn18s resulted in a greater variation of
type 1 colonies.Relative expression levels of Cdx2 normalized against different reference genes in
samples from all four colony types. A: The relative expression levels of Cdx2 in each
colony sample are arranged from highest to lowest expression level. There were no distinctive colony
type-specific patterns, irrespective of the reference gene used. B: Dot plots showing the
Cdx2 expression levels of each sample and the mean values. There were significant
differences between colony types. Type 1 colony included one exceptionally high sample when
Rn18s was used. 7 reference genes, Rn18s, Ubc,
Atp5b, Cyc1, Canx, Actb, and
Gapdh. 2 reference genes, Actb and Gapdh.We did not expect the Cdx2 expression levels of TSC colonies not to be correlated with their
undifferentiated statuses because this is one of the most frequently used genes for marking undifferentiated
trophoblasts [14]. Therefore, we examined whether further differentiation
of TSCs would result in downregulation of Cdx2, using Gapdh as the internal
reference gene. We cultured TSCs under the FGF4- and heparin-free condition, which is known to strongly induce the
differentiation of TSCs (Fig. 5A). After the removal of FGF4 and heparin at 48 h after passaging, the colonies started to change morphology,
resulting in the transformation of most colonies into type 5 by 96 h (48 h after the removal of FGF4 and heparin;
Fig. 5B). This change was associated with downregulation of
Cdx2 as well as Elf5 (Fig. 5C).
Taken together, it is likely that both Cdx2 and Elf5 can be used as TSC markers,
but Elf5 might be a better indicator of the undifferentiated status of TSCs maintained under
standard culture conditions including FGF4 and heparin.
Fig. 5.
Effect of the removal of FGF4 and heparin (F4H) on colony morphology and gene expressions in TSCs. A:
Experimental design for the observation of the effect of the removal FGF4- and heparin-free culture
conditions. B: Morphological changes in TSC colonies cultured with or without FGF4 and heparin. Type 5
colonies with a sparse monolayered shape became predominant in the absence of FGF4 and heparin by 96 h.
(Inset) Higher magnification showing a typical type 5 colony enclosed by a dotted rectangle. Scale bar = 100
μm. C: Relative expression levels of Cdx2 and Elf5 in TSCs cultured with
or without FGF4 and heparin. Gapdh was used as an internal control for normalization. * P
< 0.05.
Effect of the removal of FGF4 and heparin (F4H) on colony morphology and gene expressions in TSCs. A:
Experimental design for the observation of the effect of the removal FGF4- and heparin-free culture
conditions. B: Morphological changes in TSC colonies cultured with or without FGF4 and heparin. Type 5
colonies with a sparse monolayered shape became predominant in the absence of FGF4 and heparin by 96 h.
(Inset) Higher magnification showing a typical type 5 colony enclosed by a dotted rectangle. Scale bar = 100
μm. C: Relative expression levels of Cdx2 and Elf5 in TSCs cultured with
or without FGF4 and heparin. Gapdh was used as an internal control for normalization. * P
< 0.05.These results were consistent with the initial analysis carried out for the identification of stable reference
genes (M value): the most stable gene was Gapdh and the most unstable one was
Rn18s. In general, geometric averaging methods are used to determine the minimum number of
reference genes required to calculate a reliable normalization factor. However, in our case, the combination of
two genes (Gapdh and Actb) was sufficient to obtain a reliable normalization.
Furthermore, the use of the single gene (Gapdh) gave similar results to those based on a
combination of both genes. This probably reflected the high stability of these two genes across the different
colony types. When Rn18s was used, the results were highly variable for both
Elf5 and Cdx2, with a tendency for a relatively higher expression among type 3
colonies (Figs. 3A and 4A),
probably indicating the biased normalization pattern specific to this gene.Our findings suggest that the use of stable reference genes is critical in order to gain an accurate
understanding of the gene expression profiles of cultured cell lines, especially when they are composed of
heterogeneous cell populations. In addition, this study identified Elf5 as a more reliable
indicator for the undifferentiated status of TSCs than Cdx2. It could be important to verify the
applicability of this finding to other TSC lines as the ones currently available show highly variable
characteristics in terms of their proliferation in vitro and differentiation in
vivo.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines
The TSC lines used in this study were B6TS4 and EGFP-TS3.5, which were derived from a blastocyst
of the C57BL/6 and ICR mouse strain, respectively. TSCs were cultured as described previously [1]. In brief, cells were cultured on mitomycin-C (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,
MO, USA)-treated primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts in RPMI1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose,
CA, USA) with 20% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 25 ng/ml human recombinant FGF4 (Wako Pure
Chemicals, Osaka, Japan), 1 μg/ml heparin (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), 1%
GlutaMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Colony classification and sample collection
TSC colonies could be classified into four major types by their morphology. Representative colony
morphologies are shown in Fig. 1, together with descriptions of
their morphological characters. There was an additional type (type 5), but this was not analyzed here because
it rarely emerged under normal TSC culture conditions. At 96 h after passaging, colonies were picked up using
a glass capillary pipette under a dissecting microscope and used for RT-qPCR analysis. Each sample consisted
of 60–80 colonies of the same colony type.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA for RT-qPCR was extracted with RNeasy Micro kits (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) from TSC colonies.
Following extraction, the first strand cDNA was synthesized with a SuperScript III reverse transcriptase
reagent set (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gene expression was assessed by qPCR on a StepOnePlus™ instrument
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) using Quantitect SYBR Green PCR kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Samples were denatured at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 amplification cycles consisting of
denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec, and an annealing and extension step at 60°C for 1 min. Raw Cq (Ct) values
(PCR cycles at which the fluorescence signal crosses threshold) were calculated using StepOne software (v.
2.1; Thermo Fisher Scientific) setting baseline and appropriate threshold values. All runs were performed in
triplicate and an identical sample was used in each different runs as an inter-run calibration sample to
correct for the technical variance between the runs and thus compare results from different plates [4, 6]. The primer sets used for TSC
marker genes were the following: Cdx2, 5′–GCAGTCCCTAGGAAGCCAAG–3′ and
5′–GCAGCCAGCTCACTTTTCCT–3′; Elf5, 5′–GTGGCATCCTGGAATGGGAA–3′ and 5′–CACTAACCTCCGGTCAACCC–3′.
For quantification of reference genes (Atp5b, Canx, Cyc1,
Gapdh, Ubc, Rn18s), the primer sets from the Mouse geNorm
Kit (Primerdesign Ltd., Southampton, UK) were used. Actb was analyzed as an additional
reference gene using the primer set 5′–CTGTCGAGTCGCGTCCA–3′ and 5′–ACCCATTCCCACCATCACAC–3′.
Data analysis
The baseline cycles and cycle thresholds were established manually for each gene. To assess the stability of
the reference genes, the raw Cq values of each reference gene were analyzed with the geNorm algorithmic tool
using qbasePlus software (Biogazelle). These values were converted into normalized relative
quantities (NRQs) with multiple reference genes based on the modified classic Δ-Δ-Ct method [6] or a single reference gene. NRQs were scaled in relation to the mean
across all samples for each target or to reference genes. We ranked the stability of the reference genes based
on the mean expression stability (geNorm M value) provided by the geNorm program. To determine the optimal
number of reference genes across different colony types, qbasePlus was also used to calculate
pairwise variation (V value). Normalization of the expression levels of TSC marker genes
(Cdx2 and Elf5) was performed by qbasePlus software using
reference gene(s) ranked as described above.
Statistical Analysis
To compare the gene expression levels between colony types within the TSC lines, normalized relative mRNA
levels were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests; P < 0.05
was considered statistically significant.
Authors: Martyn Donnison; Angela Beaton; Helen W Davey; Ric Broadhurst; Phil L'Huillier; Peter L Pfeffer Journal: Development Date: 2005-04-13 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Tilo Kunath; Marc K Saba-El-Leil; Marwa Almousailleakh; Jason Wray; Sylvain Meloche; Austin Smith Journal: Development Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Jo Vandesompele; Katleen De Preter; Filip Pattyn; Bruce Poppe; Nadine Van Roy; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2002-06-18 Impact factor: 13.583