Literature DB >> 26853552

In vivo bone regeneration on titanium devices using serum-free grown adipose-derived stem cells, in a sheep femur model.

Diogo Godoy Zanicotti1, Dawn Elizabeth Coates2, Warwick John Duncan1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the capacity of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC), grown in serum-free conditions, to regenerate bone around titanium discs with different titanium surfaces.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ovine ADSC (oADSC) were isolated from seven sheep and cultured using serum-free and osteogenic conditions. Prior to in vivo testing, the growth and osteogenic behaviour of these cells were analysed in vitro using cell proliferation and extracellular matrix mineralisation assays. The bone regenerative capacity of autologous oADSC was evaluated in vivo on titanium discs in a sheep femur epicondyle model. Machined (MTi) and alumina-blasted (ABTi) titanium discs were used. Bone regeneration within the defects was evaluated after 1 month using histology and histomorphometry. PKH26 cell-tracking dye was used to verify the persistence of oADSC in the surgical wound.
RESULTS: oADSC sourced from five of seven sheep differentiated into osteoblast-like cells. Cellular proliferation was reduced only for osteogenically induced oADSC (oOS-ADSC) grown on ABTi, compared to non-induced oADSC grown on ABTi and tissue culture polystyrene (P = 0.03 and 0.02 respectively). There was no significant difference for in vitro mineralisation assays comparing oADSC with oOS-ADSC, regardless of implant surface type. oADSC labelled with PKH26 were detected 1 month after surgery within the defect. There was no difference in bone regeneration between the bone defects treated with oADSC vs. just blood clot.
CONCLUSION: After 1-month healing, the use of autologous oADSC did not improve bone regeneration in defects containing titanium devices with different surfaces.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomaterials; bone implant interactions; bone substitutes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26853552     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

Review 1.  Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Laura Frese; Petra E Dijkman; Simon P Hoerstrup
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 2.  Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Helena Filipa Pereira; Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Filipe Samuel Silva; Rui Luís Reis; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Association of Fpr1 gene expression with osteogenesis and adipogenesis of adipose derived stem cells.

Authors:  Wan'an Xiao; Quang Le; Di Zhu; Abhijit Dighe; Quanjun Cui; Xinlin Yang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.322

4.  Biocompatibility of Yttria-Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal Seeded with Human Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell.

Authors:  Arif Rachman; Fedik A Rantam; Indra Bachtiar; Fatchiyah Fatchiyah; Lukman Hakim; Indri L Putri; Latief Mooduto
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2018-12

5.  Fat grafting and platelet-rich plasma in wound healing: a review of histology from animal studies.

Authors:  Grant S Nolan; Oliver J Smith; Gavin Jell; Afshin Mosahebi
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Application of Adipose Tissue Stem Cells in Regenerative Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sumit Gaur; Rupali Agnihotri
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2021-06-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.