Literature DB >> 26853360

Target Selection Signals Influence Perceptual Decisions by Modulating the Onset and Rate of Evidence Accumulation.

Gerard M Loughnane1, Daniel P Newman2, Mark A Bellgrove2, Edmund C Lalor3, Simon P Kelly4, Redmond G O'Connell5.   

Abstract

Computational and neurophysiological research has highlighted neural processes that accumulate sensory evidence for perceptual decisions. These processes have been studied in the context of highly simplified perceptual discrimination paradigms in which the physical evidence appears at times and locations that are either entirely predictable or exogenously cued (e.g., by the onset of the stimulus itself). Yet, we are rarely afforded such certainty in everyday life. For example, when driving along a busy motorway, we must continually monitor the movements of surrounding vehicles for events that call for a lane change. In such scenarios, it is unknown which of the continuously present information sources will become relevant or when. Although it is well established that evidence integration provides an effective mechanism for countering the impact of noise, the question of how this mechanism is implemented in the face of uncertain evidence onsets has yet to be answered. Here, we show that when monitoring two potential sources of information for evidence occurring unpredictably in both time and space, the human brain employs discrete, early target selection signals that significantly modulate the onset and rate of neural evidence accumulation, and thereby the timing and accuracy of perceptual reports. These selection signals share many of the key characteristics of the N2pc component highlighted in the literature on visual search yet are present even in the absence of distractors and under situations of low temporal and spatial uncertainty. These data provide novel insights into how target selection supports decision making in uncertain environments.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26853360     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  20 in total

1.  Visuospatial Asymmetries Arise from Differences in the Onset Time of Perceptual Evidence Accumulation.

Authors:  Daniel P Newman; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty.

Authors:  Ciara A Devine; Christine Gaffney; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Neurophysiological correlates of dual tasking in people with Parkinson's disease and freezing of gait.

Authors:  Conor Fearon; John S Butler; Saskia M Waechter; Isabelle Killane; Simon P Kelly; Richard B Reilly; Timothy Lynch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Role of Object Individuation in Attention and Visual Processing.

Authors:  Bridgitt Shea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neurocomputational mechanisms of prior-informed perceptual decision-making in humans.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Elaine A Corbett; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-12-14

6.  Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.

Authors:  Ruud L van den Brink; Peter R Murphy; Kobe Desender; Nicole de Ru; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation.

Authors:  Gerard M Loughnane; Daniel P Newman; Sarita Tamang; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Expectations Do Not Alter Early Sensory Processing during Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana; Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Annalisa Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Stimulus Reliability Automatically Biases Temporal Integration of Discrete Perceptual Targets in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Dragan Rangelov; Rebecca West; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.