Literature DB >> 26852173

Margin reduction from image guided radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma: Secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0630 results.

X Allen Li1, Xiaojian Chen2, Qiang Zhang3, David G Kirsch4, Ivy Petersen5, Thomas F DeLaney6, Carolyn R Freeman7, Andy Trotti8, Ying Hitchcock9, Meena Bedi2, Michael Haddock5, Kilian Salerno10, George Dundas11, Dian Wang12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Six imaging modalities were used in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0630, a study of image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for primary soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. We analyzed all daily patient-repositioning data collected in this trial to determine the impact of daily IGRT on clinical target volume-to-planning target volume (CTV-to-PTV) margin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Daily repositioning data, including shifts in right-left (RL), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions and rotations for 98 patients enrolled in RTOG 0630 from 18 institutions were analyzed. Patients were repositioned daily on the basis of bone anatomy by using pretreatment images, including kilovoltage orthogonal images (KVorth), megavoltage orthogonal images (MVorth), KV fan-beam computed tomography (KVCT), KV cone beam CT (KVCB), MV fan-beam CT (MVCT), and MV cone beam CT (MVCB). Means and standard deviations (SDs) for each shift and rotation were calculated for each patient and for each IGRT modality. The Student's t tests and F-tests were performed to analyze the differences in the means and SDs. Necessary CTV-to-PTV margins were estimated.
RESULTS: The repositioning shifts and day-to-day variations were large and generally similar for the 6 imaging modalities. Of the 2 most commonly used modalities, MVCT and KVorth, there were no statistically significant differences in the shifts and rotations (P = .15 and .59 for the RL and SI shifts, respectively; and P = .22 for rotation), except for shifts in AP direction (P = .002). The estimated CTV-to-PTV margins in the RL, SI, and AP directions would be 13.0, 10.4, and 11.7 mm from MVCT data, respectively, and 13.1, 8.6, and 10.8 mm from KVorth data, respectively, indicating that margins substantially larger than 5 mm used with daily IGRT would be required in the absence of IGRT.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed large daily repositioning errors and the large variations among institutions imply that daily IGRT is necessary for this tumor site, particularly in multi-institutional trials. Otherwise, a CTV-to-PTV margin of 1.5 cm is required to account for daily setup variations.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26852173      PMCID: PMC4870138          DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  8 in total

1.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.

Authors:  M van Herk; P Remeijer; C Rasch; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas Rockwell Mackie; Jeff Kapatoes; Ken Ruchala; Weiguo Lu; Chuan Wu; Gustavo Olivera; Lisa Forrest; Wolfgang Tome; Jim Welsh; Robert Jeraj; Paul Harari; Paul Reckwerdt; Bhudatt Paliwal; Mark Ritter; Harry Keller; Jack Fowler; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Emergent technologies for 3-dimensional image-guided radiation delivery.

Authors:  David A Jaffray
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  Significant Reduction of Late Toxicities in Patients With Extremity Sarcoma Treated With Image-Guided Radiation Therapy to a Reduced Target Volume: Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG-0630 Trial.

Authors:  Dian Wang; Qiang Zhang; Burton L Eisenberg; John M Kane; X Allen Li; David Lucas; Ivy A Petersen; Thomas F DeLaney; Carolyn R Freeman; Steven E Finkelstein; Ying J Hitchcock; Manpreet Bedi; Anurag K Singh; George Dundas; David G Kirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Interfractional variations in patient setup and anatomic change assessed by daily computed tomography.

Authors:  X Allen Li; X Sharon Qi; Marissa Pitterle; Kapila Kalakota; Kevin Mueller; Beth A Erickson; Dian Wang; Christopher J Schultz; Selim Y Firat; J Frank Wilson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Late radiation morbidity following randomization to preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Aileen M Davis; Brian O'Sullivan; Robert Turcotte; Robert Bell; Charles Catton; Pierre Chabot; Jay Wunder; Alex Hammond; Veronique Benk; Rita Kandel; Karen Goddard; Carolyn Freeman; Anna Sadura; Benny Zee; Andrew Day; Dongsheng Tu; Joseph Pater
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Phase 2 study of preoperative image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce wound and combined modality morbidities in lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Brian O'Sullivan; Anthony M Griffin; Colleen I Dickie; Michael B Sharpe; Peter W M Chung; Charles N Catton; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder; Benjamin M Deheshi; Lawrence M White; Rita A Kandel; David A Jaffray; Robert S Bell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Brian O'Sullivan; Aileen M Davis; Robert Turcotte; Robert Bell; Charles Catton; Pierre Chabot; Jay Wunder; Rita Kandel; Karen Goddard; Anna Sadura; Joseph Pater; Benny Zee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Robustness Analysis for External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans: Describing Uncertainty Scenarios and Reporting Their Dosimetric Consequences.

Authors:  Adam D Yock; Radhe Mohan; Stella Flampouri; Walter Bosch; Paige A Taylor; David Gladstone; Siyong Kim; Jason Sohn; Robert Wallace; Ying Xiao; Jeff Buchsbaum
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-15

Review 2.  Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Role of Local Control.

Authors:  Elyse J Brinkmann; Safia K Ahmed; Matthew T Houdek
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-02-05

3.  Assessment with cone-beam computed tomography of intrafractional motion and interfractional position changes of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic tumours with implanted fiducial marker.

Authors:  Shingo Ohira; Masaru Isono; Yoshihiro Ueda; Takero Hirata; Reiko Ashida; Hidenori Takahashi; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Masaaki Takashina; Masahiko Koizumi; Teruki Teshima
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Adaptive radiotherapy in patients receiving neoadjuvant radiation for soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Ramiz Abu-Hijlih; Sara Mheid; Fawzi Abuhijla; Wafa Asha; Issa Mohamad; Abdullah Alrashdan; Samer Alheet; Haitham Kana'an; Mohammad Abd Al-Raheem; Abdelatif Almousa
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-03-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.