Literature DB >> 26851750

The association between socioeconomic status and tumour stage at diagnosis of ovarian cancer: A pooled analysis of 18 case-control studies.

Camilla Præstegaard1, Susanne K Kjaer2, Thor S S Nielsen1, Signe M Jensen3, Penelope M Webb4, Christina M Nagle5, Estrid Høgdall6, Harvey A Risch7, Mary Anne Rossing8, Jennifer A Doherty9, Kristine G Wicklund10, Marc T Goodman11, Francesmary Modugno12, Kirsten Moysich13, Roberta B Ness14, Robert P Edwards15, Ellen L Goode16, Stacey J Winham17, Brooke L Fridley17, Daniel W Cramer18, Kathryn L Terry19, Joellen M Schildkraut20, Andrew Berchuck21, Elisa V Bandera22, Lisa Paddock23, Lambertus A Kiemeney24, Leon F Massuger25, Nicolas Wentzensen26, Paul Pharoah27, Honglin Song28, Alice S Whittemore29, Valerie McGuire29, Weiva Sieh29, Joseph Rothstein29, Hoda Anton-Culver30, Argyrios Ziogas31, Usha Menon32, Simon A Gayther32, Susan J Ramus33, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj32, Anna H Wu33, Celeste L Pearce34, Malcolm C Pike35, Alice W Lee33, Jenny Chang-Claude36, Allan Jensen37.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a known predictor of survival for several cancers and it has been suggested that SES differences affecting tumour stage at diagnosis may be the most important explanatory factor for this. However, only a limited number of studies have investigated SES differences in tumour stage at diagnosis of ovarian cancer. In a pooled analysis, we investigated whether SES as represented by level of education is predictive for advanced tumour stage at diagnosis of ovarian cancer, overall and by histotype. The effect of cigarette smoking and body mass index (BMI) on the association was also evaluated.
METHODS: From 18 case-control studies, we obtained information on 10,601 women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer. Study specific odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from logistic regression models and combined into a pooled odds ratio (pOR) using a random effects model.
RESULTS: Overall, women who completed ≤high school had an increased risk of advanced tumour stage at diagnosis compared with women who completed >high school (pOR 1.15; 95% CI 1.03-1.28). The risk estimates for the different histotypes of ovarian cancer resembled that observed for ovarian cancers combined but did not reach statistical significance. Our results were unchanged when we included BMI and cigarette smoking.
CONCLUSION: Lower level of education was associated with an increased risk of advanced tumour stage at diagnosis of ovarian cancer. The observed socioeconomic difference in stage at diagnosis of ovarian cancer calls for further studies on how to reduce this diagnostic delay.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Ovarian cancer; Pooled analysis; Socioeconomic status; Tumour stage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26851750      PMCID: PMC4993452          DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  50 in total

1.  Relation between socioeconomic status and tumour stage in patients with breast, colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancer: results from four national, population based studies.

Authors:  D H Brewster; C S Thomson; D J Hole; R J Black; P L Stroner; C R Gillis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-07

2.  Socio-economic disadvantage and body mass over the life course in women and men: results from the Northern Swedish Cohort.

Authors:  Per E Gustafsson; Mats Persson; Anne Hammarström
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice.

Authors:  Siegfried Geyer; Orjan Hemström; Richard Peter; Denny Vågerö
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer at 2q31 and 8q24.

Authors:  Ellen L Goode; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Honglin Song; Susan J Ramus; Maria Notaridou; Kate Lawrenson; Martin Widschwendter; Robert A Vierkant; Melissa C Larson; Susanne K Kjaer; Michael J Birrer; Andrew Berchuck; Joellen Schildkraut; Ian Tomlinson; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Linda S Cook; Jacek Gronwald; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Martin E Gore; Ian Campbell; Alice S Whittemore; Rebecca Sutphen; Catherine Phelan; Hoda Anton-Culver; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Diether Lambrechts; Mary Anne Rossing; Jenny Chang-Claude; Kirsten B Moysich; Marc T Goodman; Thilo Dörk; Heli Nevanlinna; Roberta B Ness; Thorunn Rafnar; Claus Hogdall; Estrid Hogdall; Brooke L Fridley; Julie M Cunningham; Weiva Sieh; Valerie McGuire; Andrew K Godwin; Daniel W Cramer; Dena Hernandez; Douglas Levine; Karen Lu; Edwin S Iversen; Rachel T Palmieri; Richard Houlston; Anne M van Altena; Katja K H Aben; Leon F A G Massuger; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Linda E Kelemen; Nhu D Le; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubinski; Krzysztof Medrek; Anne Stafford; Douglas F Easton; Jonathan Tyrer; Kelly L Bolton; Patricia Harrington; Diana Eccles; Ann Chen; Ashley N Molina; Barbara N Davila; Hector Arango; Ya-Yu Tsai; Zhihua Chen; Harvey A Risch; John McLaughlin; Steven A Narod; Argyrios Ziogas; Wendy Brewster; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Usha Menon; Anna H Wu; Daniel O Stram; Malcolm C Pike; Jonathan Beesley; Penelope M Webb; Xiaoqing Chen; Arif B Ekici; Falk C Thiel; Matthias W Beckmann; Hannah Yang; Nicolas Wentzensen; Jolanta Lissowska; Peter A Fasching; Evelyn Despierre; Frederic Amant; Ignace Vergote; Jennifer Doherty; Rebecca Hein; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Galina Lurie; Michael E Carney; Pamela J Thompson; Ingo Runnebaum; Peter Hillemanns; Matthias Dürst; Natalia Antonenkova; Natalia Bogdanova; Arto Leminen; Ralf Butzow; Tuomas Heikkinen; Kari Stefansson; Patrick Sulem; Sören Besenbacher; Thomas A Sellers; Simon A Gayther; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Endometrial cancer: socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic differences in stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival.

Authors:  Terri Madison; David Schottenfeld; Sherman A James; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Association of two common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 locus and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Marc T Goodman; Galina Lurie; Pamela J Thompson; Katharine E McDuffie; Michael E Carney
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.678

7.  Talcum powder, chronic pelvic inflammation and NSAIDs in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A Merritt; Adèle C Green; Christina M Nagle; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Recruitment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients proved challenging in a multicentre biobanking study.

Authors:  Nyaladzi Balogun; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Eva L Wozniak; Anita Lim; Andy Ryan; Susan J Ramus; Jeremy Ford; Matthew Burnell; Martin Widschwendter; Sue F Gessler; Simon A Gayther; Ian J Jacobs; Usha Menon
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1).

Authors:  Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Aspirin, nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and acetaminophen use and risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Roberta B Ness; Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic; Megan A Murphy; Ellen L Goode; Elizabeth M Poole; Louise A Brinton; Penelope M Webb; Christina M Nagle; Susan J Jordan; Harvey A Risch; Mary Anne Rossing; Jennifer A Doherty; Marc T Goodman; Galina Lurie; Susanne K Kjær; Estrid Hogdall; Allan Jensen; Daniel W Cramer; Kathryn L Terry; Allison Vitonis; Elisa V Bandera; Sara Olson; Melony G King; Urmila Chandran; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Usha Menon; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Anna H Wu; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Malcolm C Pike; Andrew Berchuck; Joellen M Schildkraut; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 11.816

View more
  7 in total

1.  Long non-coding RNAs in ovarian cancer: expression profile and functional spectrum.

Authors:  Selin Oncul; Paola Amero; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; George A Calin; Anil K Sood; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Understanding the Experience of Canadian Women Living with Ovarian Cancer through the Every Woman StudyTM.

Authors:  Alicia Tone; Talin Boghosian; Alison Ross; Elisabeth Baugh; Alon D Altman; Lesa Dawson; Frances Reid; Cailey Crawford
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Effect of socioeconomic status on stage at diagnosis of lung cancer in a hospital-based multicenter retrospective clinical epidemiological study in China, 2005-2014.

Authors:  Yuanqiu Li; Jufang Shi; Shicheng Yu; Le Wang; Jianjun Liu; Jiansong Ren; Shugeng Gao; Zhouguang Hui; Junling Li; Ning Wu; Boyan Yang; Shangmei Liu; Mingfang Qin; Debin Wang; Xianzhen Liao; Xiaojing Xing; Lingbin Du; Li Yang; Yuqin Liu; Yongzhen Zhang; Kai Zhang; Youlin Qiao; Jie He; Min Dai; Hongyan Yao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Risk Model in Women with Ovarian Cancer Without Mutations.

Authors:  Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska; Anita Chudecka-Głaz; Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła; Kamila Rasinska; Paulina Dubiel; Janusz Menkiszak
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2018-11-25

5.  Improved survival in ovarian cancer, with widening survival gaps of races and socioeconomic status: a period analysis, 1983-2012.

Authors:  Jinna Wu; Huanhuan Sun; Lewei Yang; Yun Deng; Yan Yan; Shuncong Wang; Guangwei Yang; Haiqing Ma
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Patient and primary care delays in the diagnostic pathway of gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of influencing factors.

Authors:  Pauline Williams; Peter Murchie; Christine Bond
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Socioeconomic Status and Ovarian Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: A Study Nested Within UKCTOCS.

Authors:  Chloe Karpinskyj; Matthew Burnell; Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo; Andy Ryan; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Ian Jacobs; Max Parmar; Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.