Literature DB >> 26850514

Arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen technique for large U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears.

Sung-Weon Jung1, Dong-Hee Kim2, Seung-Hoon Kang2, Ji-Heon Lee2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While a conventional single- or double-row repair technique could be applied for repair of C-shaped tears, a different surgical strategy should be considered for repair of U- or L-shaped tears because they typically have complex patterns with anterior, posterior, or both mobile leaves. This study was performed to examine the outcomes of the modified Mason-Allen technique for footprint restoration in the treatment of large U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients who underwent an arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen technique for large U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears between January 2012 and December 2013 were included in this study. Margin convergence was first performed to reduce the tear gap and tension, and then, an arthroscopic Mason-Allen technique was performed to restore the rotator cuff footprint in a side-to-end repair fashion. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and for a minimum of 2 years of follow-up with a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Constant score, and ultrasonography.
RESULTS: There was significant improvement in all VAS and Constant scores compared with the preoperative values (P < 0.001). Functional results by Constant scores included 9 cases that were classified as excellent, 11 cases as good, 8 cases as fair, and 2 cases as poor. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that heavy work, pseudoparalysis, joint space narrowing, fatty degeneration of the SST and IST, and a positive tangent sign were found to significantly correlate with functional outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that only fatty degeneration of the SST was a risk factor for fair/poor clinical outcomes. Complications occurred in 5 of the 32 patients (15.6 %), and the reoperation rate due to complications was 6.3 % (2 of 32 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: An arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen technique was sufficient to restore the footprint of the rotator cuff in our data. Overall satisfactory results were achieved in most patients, with the exception of those with severe fatty degeneration. An arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen technique could be an effective and reliable alternative for patients with large U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series, Therapeutic Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Large size; Margin convergence; Mason-Allen technique; Rotator cuff tear; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26850514     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4028-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

1.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair.

Authors:  S S Burkhart; S M Danaceau; C E Pearce
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  A modified Mason-Allen technique for rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.

Authors:  Markus Thomas Scheibel; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff.

Authors:  D T Harryman; L A Mack; K Y Wang; S E Jackins; M L Richardson; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Management of disorders of the rotator cuff: proceedings of the ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus meeting.

Authors:  Guillermo Arce; Klaus Bak; Gregory Bain; Emilio Calvo; Benno Ejnisman; Giovanni Di Giacomo; Vicente Gutierrez; Dan Guttmann; Eiji Itoi; W Ben Kibler; Tom Ludvigsen; Augustus Mazzocca; Alberto de Castro Pochini; Felix Savoie; Hiroyuki Sugaya; John Uribe; Francisco Vergara; Jaap Willems; Yon Sik Yoo; John W McNeil; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Decision-making in massive rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  André Thès; Philippe Hardy; Klaus Bak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single-row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Peter L C Lapner; Elham Sabri; Kawan Rakhra; Sheila McRae; Jeff Leiter; Kimberly Bell; Peter Macdonald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Management of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Christopher C Schmidt; Claudius D Jarrett; Brandon T Brown
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears.

Authors:  Daniel Goutallier; Jean-Marie Postel; Pascal Gleyze; Pierre Leguilloux; Stéphane Van Driessche
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study.

Authors:  Joseph P Iannotti; Allen Deutsch; Andrew Green; Sally Rudicel; Jared Christensen; Shannon Marraffino; Scott Rodeo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.