Literature DB >> 26850498

How to Review a Manuscript.

Joseph A Hill1.   

Abstract

Manuscript peer review is fundamental to the evaluation and dissemination of modern science; it is the process whereby good science is enhanced and bad science is dismissed. Very little objective evidence, however, has been amassed to guide the manuscript peer review process. Rather, it is learned by experience and mentoring: by doing reviews, receiving reviews of one's own work, and by obtaining feedback from seasoned reviewers. Here, I lay out my perspective on this cornerstone of the scientific endeavor.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26850498      PMCID: PMC4775410          DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  5 in total

1.  How to review a paper.

Authors:  Dale J Benos; Kevin L Kirk; John E Hall
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.

Authors:  Michael S Lauer; Richard Nakamura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

Authors:  James M Provenzale; Robert J Stanley
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Vaccine Hesitancy: Causes, Consequences, and a Call to Action.

Authors:  Daniel A Salmon; Matthew Z Dudley; Jason M Glanz; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.043

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.

Authors:  Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 2.  Improving the peer review skills of young rheumatologists and researchers in rheumatology: the EMEUNET Peer Review Mentoring Program.

Authors:  Javier Rodríguez-Carrio; Polina Putrik; Alexandre Sepriano; Anna Moltó; Elena Nikiphorou; Laure Gossec; Tore K Kvien; Sofia Ramiro
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 3.  Practical Tips of English Expressions for Non-Native English-Speaking Peer Reviewers.

Authors:  Mikyoung Lee
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2021-07-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.