Literature DB >> 26850425

Is a questionnaire and radiograph-based follow-up model for patients with primary hip and knee arthroplasty a viable alternative to traditional regular outpatient follow-up clinic?

S R Kingsbury1, B Dube1, C M Thomas2, P G Conaghan3, M H Stone4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Increasing demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) and associated follow-up has placed huge demands on orthopaedic services. Feasible follow-up mechanisms are therefore essential.
METHODS: We conducted an audit of clinical follow-up decision-making for THA/TKA based on questionnaire/radiograph review compared with local practice of Arthroplasty Care Practitioner (ACP)-led outpatient follow-up. In all 599 patients attending an ACP-led THA/TKA follow-up clinic had a pelvic/knee radiograph, completed a pain/function questionnaire and were reviewed by an ACP. An experienced orthopaedic surgeon reviewed the same radiographs and questionnaires, without patient contact or knowledge of the ACP's decision. Each pathway classified patients into: urgent review, annual monitoring, routine follow-up or discharge.
RESULTS: In total, 401 hip and 198 knee patients were included. There was substantial agreement between the ACP and surgeon for both hip (kappa = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.76) and knee (kappa = 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.88). Positive agreement was very high for discharge and routine follow-up; however the ACP was more likely to select annual monitoring and the surgeon urgent review. DISCUSSION: Review of the questionnaire/radiograph together identified all patients in need of increased surveillance, with good agreement for on-going patient management. However, review of the radiograph or questionnaire alone missed some patients with potential problems. A radiograph in conjunction with a questionnaire as a review may represent a cost effective THA/TKA follow-up mechanism. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: A questionnaire and radiograph-based remote review may represent a cost-effective total joint arthroplasty follow-up mechanism; thereby reducing the considerable burden that follow-up currently places on the NHS. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip; arthroplasty; care pathways; follow-up; knee

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26850425     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B2.36424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  9 in total

1.  Requesting spinal MRIs effectively from primary care referrals.

Authors:  Ignatius Liew; Fraser Dean; Gillian Anderson; Odhrán Murray
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Monitoring Patient Recovery After THA or TKA Using Mobile Technology.

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Chisa Hidaka; Kara Fields; Wasif Islam; David Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-02-12

3.  How often is the office visit needed? Predicting total knee arthroplasty revision risk using pain/function scores.

Authors:  Charles D Hightower; Lisa S Hightower; Penny J Tatman; Patrick M Morgan; Terence Gioe; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Is virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement acceptable to patients and clinicians? A sequential mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Rebekah J Parkes; Joanne Palmer; Jennifer Wingham; Dan H Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-03-01

5.  Remote Follow-up of Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic - Is This the way Forward?

Authors:  Sameer A Mansukhani; Praveen Gopinath; Amit Chaturvedi; Georgios Konstantopoulos; Dimitra Leivadiotou
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 6.  Large variation in timing of follow-up visits after hip replacement: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Francesco Manlio Gambaro; Rob G H H Nelissen; Guido Grappiolo
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-03-17

7.  Automatic Identification of Failure in Hip Replacement: An Artificial Intelligence Approach.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Francesco Manlio Gambaro; Katia Chiappetta; Guido Grappiolo; Anna Maria Bianchi; Valentina D A Corino
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29

8.  Identifying complications requiring re-operation following primary hip or knee arthroplasty: a consecutive series of 98 patients.

Authors:  Bill Reynolds; Nick Maister; Stephen D Gill; Shaun Waring; Peter Schoch; Sally Beattie; Andrew Thomson; Richard S Page
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  It is merely subjective opinion that patient-reported outcome measures are not objective tools.

Authors:  D F Hamilton; J M Giesinger; K Giesinger
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.