Literature DB >> 26849294

Fine-tuning for the tropics: application of eDNA technology for invasive fish detection in tropical freshwater ecosystems.

Heather L A Robson1,2,3,4, Tansyn H Noble1,2,3, Richard J Saunders1,3,5, Simon K A Robson1,4, Damien W Burrows2, Dean R Jerry1,2,3.   

Abstract

Invasive species pose a major threat to aquatic ecosystems. Their impact can be particularly severe in tropical regions, like those in northern Australia, where >20 invasive fish species are recorded. In temperate regions, environmental DNA (eDNA) technology is gaining momentum as a tool to detect aquatic pests, but the technology's effectiveness has not been fully explored in tropical systems with their unique climatic challenges (i.e. high turbidity, temperatures and ultraviolet light). In this study, we modified conventional eDNA protocols for use in tropical environments using the invasive fish, Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) as a detection model. We evaluated the effects of high water temperatures and fish density on the detection of tilapia eDNA, using filters with larger pores to facilitate filtration. Large-pore filters (20 μm) were effective in filtering turbid waters and retaining sufficient eDNA, whilst achieving filtration times of 2-3 min per 2-L sample. High water temperatures, often experienced in the tropics (23, 29, 35 °C), did not affect eDNA degradation rates, although high temperatures (35 °C) did significantly increase fish eDNA shedding rates. We established a minimum detection limit for tilapia (1 fish/0.4 megalitres/after 4 days) and found that low water flow (3.17 L/s) into ponds with high fish density (>16 fish/0.4 megalitres) did not affect eDNA detection. These results demonstrate that eDNA technology can be effectively used in tropical ecosystems to detect invasive fish species.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mozambique tilapia; Oreochromis mossambicus; cichlid; eDNA filtration; environmental DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849294     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  21 in total

1.  Using eDNA techniques to find the endangered big-headed turtle (Platysternon megacephalum).

Authors:  Ivan P Y Lam; Yik-Hei Sung; Jonathan J Fong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Environmental DNA from Marine Waters and Substrates: Protocols for Sampling and eDNA Extraction.

Authors:  Dominique A Cowart; Katherine R Murphy; C-H Christina Cheng
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Towards environmental detection of Chagas disease vectors and pathogen.

Authors:  Grace Gysin; Plutarco Urbano; Luke Brandner-Garrod; Shahida Begum; Mojca Kristan; Thomas Walker; Carolina Hernández; Juan David Ramírez; Louisa A Messenger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Environmental DNA analysis confirms extant populations of the cryptic Irwin's turtle within its historical range.

Authors:  Cecilia Villacorta-Rath; Thomas Espinoza; Bernie Cockayne; Jason Schaffer; Damien Burrows
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  Got Glycogen?: Development and Multispecies Validation of the Novel Preserve, Precipitate, Lyse, Precipitate, Purify (PPLPP) Workflow for Environmental DNA Extraction from Longmire's Preserved Water Samples.

Authors:  Richard C Edmunds; Damien Burrows
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-12

6.  Next-generation freshwater bioassessment: eDNA metabarcoding with a conserved metazoan primer reveals species-rich and reservoir-specific communities.

Authors:  Nicholas K M Lim; Ywee Chieh Tay; Amrita Srivathsan; Jonathan W T Tan; Jeffrey T B Kwik; Bilgenur Baloğlu; Rudolf Meier; Darren C J Yeo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Environmental DNA (eDNA): A tool for quantifying the abundant but elusive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus).

Authors:  Meredith B Nevers; Murulee N Byappanahalli; Charles C Morris; Dawn Shively; Kasia Przybyla-Kelly; Ashley M Spoljaric; Joshua Dickey; Edward F Roseman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clearing muddied waters: Capture of environmental DNA from turbid waters.

Authors:  Kelly E Williams; Kathryn P Huyvaert; Antoinette J Piaggio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Detection of Invasive Mosquito Vectors Using Environmental DNA (eDNA) from Water Samples.

Authors:  Judith Schneider; Alice Valentini; Tony Dejean; Fabrizio Montarsi; Pierre Taberlet; Olivier Glaizot; Luca Fumagalli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Environmental DNA filtration techniques affect recovered biodiversity.

Authors:  Markus Majaneva; Ola H Diserud; Shannon H C Eagle; Erik Boström; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Torbjørn Ekrem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.