Literature DB >> 26849261

Comparison of Employer Productivity Metrics to Lost Productivity Estimated by Commonly Used Questionnaires.

Bethany T Gardner1, Ann Marie Dale, Skye Buckner-Petty, Linda Van Dillen, Benjamin C Amick, Bradley Evanoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess construct and discriminant validity of four health-related work productivity loss questionnaires in relation to employer productivity metrics, and to describe variation in economic estimates of productivity loss provided by the questionnaires in healthy workers.
METHODS: Fifty-eight billing office workers completed surveys including health information and four productivity loss questionnaires. Employer productivity metrics and work hours were also obtained.
RESULTS: Productivity loss questionnaires were weakly to moderately correlated with employer productivity metrics. Workers with more health complaints reported greater health-related productivity loss than healthier workers, but showed no loss on employer productivity metrics. Economic estimates of productivity loss showed wide variation among questionnaires, yet no loss of actual productivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies are needed comparing questionnaires with objective measures in larger samples and other industries, to improve measurement methods for health-related productivity loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849261      PMCID: PMC5009902          DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  47 in total

Review 1.  A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments.

Authors:  Jennifer H Lofland; Laura Pizzi; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument.

Authors:  M C Reilly; A S Zbrozek; E M Dukes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The preventable burden of productivity loss due to suboptimal asthma control: a population-based study.

Authors:  Mohsen Sadatsafavi; Roxanne Rousseau; Wenjia Chen; Wei Zhang; Larry Lynd; J Mark FitzGerald
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale.

Authors:  Robin S Turpin; Ronald J Ozminkowski; Claire E Sharda; James J Collins; Marc L Berger; Gary M Billotti; Catherine M Baase; Michael J Olson; Sean Nicholson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 5.  Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: a scoping review of published definitions.

Authors:  Valérie Lederer; Patrick Loisel; Michèle Rivard; François Champagne
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

6.  Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism.

Authors:  G Aronsson; K Gustafsson; M Dallner
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Economic impact of workplace productivity losses due to allergic rhinitis compared with select medical conditions in the United States from an employer perspective.

Authors:  Charles E Lamb; Paul H Ratner; Clarion E Johnson; Ambarish J Ambegaonkar; Ashish V Joshi; David Day; Najah Sampson; Benjamin Eng
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.580

8.  Worker productivity outcome measures in arthritis.

Authors:  Reuben Escorpizo; Claire Bombardier; Annelies Boonen; Johanna M W Hazes; Diane Lacaille; Vibeke Strand; Dorcas Beaton
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Dry eye disease and work productivity loss in visual display users: the Osaka study.

Authors:  Miki Uchino; Yuichi Uchino; Murat Dogru; Motoko Kawashima; Norihiko Yokoi; Aoi Komuro; Yukiko Sonomura; Hiroaki Kato; Shigeru Kinoshita; Debra A Schaumberg; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 10.  Quality appraisal of generic self-reported instruments measuring health-related productivity changes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cindy Y G Noben; Silvia M A A Evers; Frans J Nijhuis; Angelique E de Rijk
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  4 in total

1.  Outcomes and treatment responses, including work productivity, among people with axial spondyloarthritis living in urban and rural areas: a mixed-methods study within a national register.

Authors:  Rosemary J Hollick; Kevin Stelfox; Linda E Dean; Joanna Shim; Karen Walker-Bone; Gary J Macfarlane
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Effects on work ability, job strain and quality of life of monitoring depression using a self-assessment instrument in recurrent general practitioner consultations: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  E-L Petersson; C Wikberg; J Westman; N Ariai; S Nejati; C Björkelund
Journal:  Work       Date:  2018

3.  Economic burden and loss of quality of life from dry eye disease in Canada.

Authors:  Clara Chan; Setareh Ziai; Varun Myageri; James G Burns; C Lisa Prokopich
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-15

4.  The differences of the economic losses due to presenteeism and treatment costs between high-stress workers and non-high-stress workers using the stress check survey in Japan.

Authors:  Tomohisa Nagata; Ryotaro Ito; Masako Nagata; Kiminori Odagami; Shigeyuki Kajiki; Kenji Fujimoto; Shinya Matsuda; Koji Mori
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.570

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.