Literature DB >> 15534499

Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale.

Robin S Turpin1, Ronald J Ozminkowski, Claire E Sharda, James J Collins, Marc L Berger, Gary M Billotti, Catherine M Baase, Michael J Olson, Sean Nicholson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study reports the reliability and validity of the 13-item Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS). The SPS differs from similar scales by focusing on knowledge-based and production-based workers.
METHODS: Data were obtained from administrative and medical claims databases and from a survey that incorporated the SPS, SF-36, and the Work Limitations Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Sixty-three percent (7797) of employees responded. Cronbach's alpha (0.83) indicates adequate reliability. Factor analysis identified two underlying factors, "completing work" and "avoiding distraction." Knowledge-based workers load on "completing work" (alpha = 0.97), whereas production-based workers load on "avoiding distraction" (alpha = 0.98). There were significant and positive relationships between the SPS, SF-36, and Work Limitations Questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS: The SPS demonstrates a high degree of reliability and validity and may be ideal for employers who seek a single scale to measure health-related productivity in a diverse employee population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534499     DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000144999.35675.a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  36 in total

1.  Presenteeism in college students: reliability and validity of the Presenteeism Scale for Students.

Authors:  Masateru Matsushita; Hiroyoshi Adachi; Mikako Arakida; Ikuro Namura; Yuko Takahashi; Masakazu Miyata; Takayuki Kumano-go; Schuhei Yamamura; Yoshihisa Shigedo; Nakamori Suganuma; Akira Mikami; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshiro Sugita
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Employee health and presenteeism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alyssa B Schultz; Dee W Edington
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-25

Review 3.  The cost and impact of health conditions on presenteeism to employers: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alyssa B Schultz; Chin-Yu Chen; Dee W Edington
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Social support and its interrelationships with demand-control model factors on presenteeism and absenteeism in Japanese civil servants.

Authors:  Yasuaki Saijo; Eiji Yoshioka; Yoshihiko Nakagi; Yasuyuki Kawanishi; Sharon J B Hanley; Takahiko Yoshida
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  Estimating productivity costs in health economic evaluations: a review of instruments and psychometric evidence.

Authors:  Kenneth Tang
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Low interrater reliability of examiners performing the prone instability test: a clinical test for lumbar shear instability.

Authors:  Margaret M Ravenna; Shannon L Hoffman; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Receiving treatment, labor force activity, and work performance among people with psychiatric disorders: results from a population survey.

Authors:  Geoffrey Waghorn; David Chant
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-12

8.  Development and measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6).

Authors:  Nathan Hutting; Josephine A Engels; Yvonne F Heerkens; J Bart Staal; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

9.  Content comparison of worker productivity questionnaires in arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework.

Authors:  Reuben Escorpizo; Alarcos Cieza; Dorcas Beaton; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-07-26

Review 10.  The importance of functional impairment to mental health outcomes: a case for reassessing our goals in depression treatment research.

Authors:  Patrick E McKnight; Todd B Kashdan
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.