Literature DB >> 26848624

Prognostic role of serum concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the ITACa trial.

Andrea Casadei Gardini1, Silvia Carloni2, Emanuela Scarpi3, Paolo Maltoni4, Romolo M Dorizzi4, Alessandro Passardi1, Giovanni Luca Frassineti1, Pietro Cortesi1, Maria Benedetta Giannini1, Giorgia Marisi2, Dino Amadori1, Alessandro Lucchesi1.   

Abstract

Serum levels of C-reactive protein are (CRP) higher in patients with neoplastic conditions and numerous studies have been performed to clarify the etiologic and prognostic role of the high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) in cancer. Our study was conducted on patients enrolled in the prospective randomized "Italian Trial in Advanced Colorectal Cancer (ITACa)" to assess hs-CRP levels and their impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Serum samples from 132 ITACa patients were collected at baseline and 2 months after starting first-line chemotherapy. The supernatant was immediately transferred to cryovials and stored at -80°C. After thawing, hs-CRP was measured with the Cobas c501 analyzer. High levels of hs-CRP (≥ 13.1 mg/L) were associated with poorer median PFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p < 0.0001) than low hs-CRP levels (< 13.1 mg/L). hs-CRP values in 107 patients were evaluated again after 2 months of therapy, revealing that patients with low hs-CRP levels in both baseline and second serum samples had the best median PFS and OS. Our study confirms the prognostic value of hs-CRP in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; metastatic colorectal cancer; overall survival; progression-free survival; thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26848624      PMCID: PMC4891113          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CC) is the third most common cause of cancer death in Western Europe and North America [1]. Interactions between the tumor and the host are increasingly recognized as important determinants of the clinical course of the disease. In particular, the status of the host's immune system has been shown to be of both prognostic and therapeutic relevance in CC and other cancers. Beneficial immune responses and detrimental pro-inflammatory responses have also been reported [2]. A pro-inflammatory immune response to the tumor may cause a systemic inflammatory response in the host which can be detected in untreated patients before surgery by measuring preoperative increases in circulating protein levels such as C-reactive protein (CRP) [3]. CRP, a typical systemic inflammation marker, was first discovered in the plasma of patients during the acute phase of pneumococcal pneumonia [4]. The protein is produced almost exclusively in hepatocytes in response to inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and, in particular, IL-6 [5, 6]. There is increasing evidence that elevated CRP levels are associated with an increased risk of malignancy [7-10]. Moreover, elevated CRP has been described as a prognostic factor in various tumors, including ovarian and gastroesophageal cancer [11-14]. Some studies have concluded that elevated CRP levels are not an independent negative predictor of survival [15], whereas others have reported that CRP has a prognostic significance in colorectal cancer [16, 17], suggesting the presence of a detrimental systemic inflammatory response. However, these reports were mostly derived from single-center study, analyzing colon and rectal cancer together. [17]. The correlation between CRP levels and prognosis in patients with CRC remains unclear [18, 19]. Several studies, including some conducted in non-neoplastic pathological settings, have found that an increased IL-6 expression is often linked to endothelial impairment, atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. Whilst levels of CRP seem to be independently associated with a significant risk of cardiovascular disease, their role in predicting venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still controversial. In CC patients, IL-6 has been described as a key regulator of cancer development, especially in sporadic and inflammation-related tumors [20]. Moreover, in this setting, inflammatory cytokines have been described as a potential cause of endothelial impairment. Interestingly, in experimental models of colitis from inflammatory bowel diseases, one study concluded that IL-6 may induce a hypercoagulable state through enhanced platelet activation [21]. Our study was carried out as a secondary analysis on patients enrolled in the phase III prospective multicenter randomized “Italian Trial in Advanced Colorectal Cancer (ITACa)” (EudraCT no. 2007–004539–44 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01878422) [22] to assess high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels at diagnosis and their impact on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A further aim was to evaluate the potential role of hs-CRP in predicting a cardiovascular event, in particular, venous thromboembolism (VTE).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

Between 14 November 2007 and 6 March 2012, 132 patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer were available for baseline hs-CRP analysis (Figure 1): 78 (59.1%) were males and 54 (40.9%) females with a median age at diagnosis of 67 years (range 34–83). Median follow-up was 36 months (range 1–65). The main demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied population are summarized in Table 1. Median PFS was 9.7 (95% CI 9.0–10.9) and median OS was 22.7 months (95% CI 19.3–27.1).
Figure 1

Flow chart of the study

Table 1

Patient characteristics (n = 132)

No. (%)
Median age, years (range)67 (34–83)
Age
 < 7074 (56.1)
 ≥ 7058 (43.9)
Gender
 Males78 (59.1)
 Females54 (40.9)
Performance Status (ECOG)
 0110 (83.3)
 1–222 (16.7)
Tumor localization
 Rectum37 (28.0)
 Colon95 (72.0)
Stage at diagnosis
 I–III31 (23.5)
 IV101 (76.5)
CT regimen
 FOLFOX479 (59.8)
 FOLFIRI53 (40.2)
KRAS status
 Wild type75 (59.1)
 Mutated52 (40.9)
 Unknown/missing6
Study treatment
 CT + B67 (50.8)
 CT65 (49.2)
Site of metastases
 Only liver37 (28.0)
 Other95 (72.0)
Comorbidities
 Cardiovascular64 (48.1)
 Pulmonary4 (3.0)
 Gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary10 (7.5)
 Metabolic/endocrine25 (18.8)
 Musculoskeletal4 (3.0)
 Dermatologic1 (0.7)
 Reproductive1 (0.7)
 Renal/urinary tracts3 (2.3)
 Allergy0
 Neurologic/psychiatric22 (16.5)

CT, chemotherapy; B, bevacizumab.

CT, chemotherapy; B, bevacizumab.

hs-CRP values and clinical outcome

We evaluated hs-CRP as a continuous variable, observing that increased hs-CRP levels were associated with decreased PFS (HR = 1.006, 95% CI 1.003–1.009, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 1.006, 95% CI 1.004–1.009, p < 0.0001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the best cutoff value of hs-CRP was 13.1 mg/L. At baseline, patients with low hs-CRP levels (< 13.1 mg/L) had a median PFS of 12.1 months (95% CI 9.3–14.9) compared to 8.9 months (95% CI 6.8–9.6) for those with high hs-CRP levels (≥ 13.1 mg/L, HR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.43–3.04, p = 0.0001) (Figure 2A). Moreover, patients with low baseline hs-CRP had a median OS of 28.8 months with respect to 14.4 months for those with high baseline hs-CRP (HR = 2.79, 95% CI 1.84–4.21, p < 0.0001) (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves of progression-free survival (PFS) (A), overall survival (OS) (B) for 132 patients

Following stratification of patients in the 2 treatment arms (CT ± bevacizumab) according to baseline hs-CRP (< 13.1 mg/L vs. ≥ 13.1 mg/L), it was observed that PFS and OS were worse when hs-CRP was ≥ 13.1 mg/L, irrespectively of treatment (Figure 3A–3D). Interaction tests involving hs-CRP levels and treatment efficacy in the CT + B and CT-only groups were not statistically significant for either PFS (p = 0.577) or OS (p = 0.108).
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS in patients treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (A), chemotherapy alone (B) and OS in patients treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (C), chemotherapy alone (D)

We also collected hs-CRP values after 2 months of therapy in 107 patients, creating 4 categories according to baseline and second-sample hs-CRP levels: low-low, low-high, high-low and high-high. The study of dynamic hs-CRP levels showed that patients with low-low hs-CRP levels had the best median PFS (12.6 months, 95% CI 10.2–16.0) and OS (29.2 months, 95% CI 25.2–36.7) with respect to the other 3 categories (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0004 respectively) (Table 2).
Table 2

PFS and OS: stratification of 107 patients into different groups with respect to hs-CRP changes

PFSOS
No. patientsNo. eventsMedian PFS (95% CI)pHR (95% CI)pNo. eventsMedian OS (95% CI)pHR (95% CI)p
Low-Low584812.6(10.2–16.0)1.003629.2(25.2–36.7)1.00
Low-High997.4(2.9–10.0)2.84(1.37–5.88)0.005718.2(3.7–33.1)2.37(1.05–5.37)0.038
High-Low28259.1(8.9–11.4)1.95(1.18–3.21)0.0092115.0(13.1–23.3)2.54(1.47–4.39)0.0008
High-High12129.4(3.1–15.7)0.0022.14(1.13–4.08)0.0201014.8(9.0–28.6)0.00043.02(1.48–6.20)0.002
To evaluate hs-CRP modifications during the course of chemotherapy and to better understand the role of B in such changes, we considered PFS and OS after stratifying patients into 2 groups according to hs-CRP levels of the second blood sample. The first group included patients with low-low and high-low levels of hs-CRP, while the second included those with low-high and high-high hs-CRP. Patients in the former group had a median PFS of 11.4 months compared to 8.6 months for those in the latter group (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.19–3.19, p = 0.008). Moreover, OS was 25.2 months in the first group and 15.3 months in the second group (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.20–3.62, p = 0.009). However, this result was confirmed only in the CT-alone arm, where median PFS was 11.3 months in the first group and 7.4 months in the second group (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.13–4.24, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in PFS or OS between the 2 groups treated with CT plus B (Table 3).
Table 3

PFS and OS: stratification of 107 patients in two main groups with respect to hs-CRP changes after two months' therapy

PFSOS
No. patientsNo. eventsMedian PFS (95% CI)pHR (95% CI)pNo. eventsMedian OS (95% CI)pHR (95% CI)p
Overall
Low – Low + High – Low867311.4(9.3–14.0)1.005725.2(22.3–29.2)1.00
Low – High + High –High21218.6(6.1–10.3)0.0071.95(1.19–3.19)0.0081715.3(11.5–28.6)0.0082.08(1.20–3.62)0.009
CT arm
Low – Low + High – Low403511.3(9.0–15.0)1.002627.3(23.3–36.6)1.00
Low – High + High – High13137.4(6.0–10.3)0.0172.19(1.13–4.24)0.0201214.4(11.6–20.8)0.00093.16(1.54–6.47)0.002
CT + B arm
Low – Low + High – Low463811.9(9.1–14.9)1.003124.8(19.3–34.5)1.00
Low – High + High – High889.1(2.9–15.9)0.2041.64(0.76–3.54)0.210524.5(3.7-nr)0.6751.23(0.47–3.19)0.675

nr:not reached.

nr:not reached. Interestingly, when we evaluated the mean change in hs-CRP values between the first and second samples, we observed a mean decrease of 10.4 mg/L from baseline in the CT plus B group (p = 0.029) and a mean decrease of 3.5 mg/L in the CT-alone group (p = 0.089) (Figure 4). We also considered drug toxicity as a single variable (grade 0–4) or a dichotomous variable (grade 0–2 vs. grade 3–4) but found no association between hs-CRP and toxicity.
Figure 4

Mean change in hs-CRP from baseline in chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (CT + B) and chemotherapy (CT) arms

hs-CRP and VTE

The overall rate of thrombosis was 12.9% (17/132). The median baseline level of hs-CRP was 7.7 mg/L (range 0.7–301.0) in patients who did not experience VTE compared to 13.1 mg/L (range 1.8–301.0) in those who did (p = 0.174). The difference was greater, albeit not significantly, in the CT + B arm (6.6 mg/L in the no VTE group vs. 30.0 mg/L in the VTE group, p = 0.149). Evaluation of the mean change in hs-CRP values between the first and second samples revealed a mean increase of 13.1 mg/L in the thrombosis group (p = 0.020) and a mean decrease of 9.6 mg/L in those who did not experience a thrombotic event (p = 0.178) (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Mean change in hs-CRP from baseline as a function of venous thromboembolism (VTE)

DISCUSSION

Elevated levels of CRP have been described as a prognostic factor in various human malignancies, including tumors of the digestive system. The majority of studies assumed that elevated serum CRP levels in patients with malignancy constituted a bodily response, secondary to tumor necrosis, local tissue damage and inflammation caused by cytokines released from leukocytes infiltrating the tumor microenvironment, in particular IL-6 [23, 24]. Our study showed that high levels of hs-CRP at baseline were associated with poorer PFS and OS than low hs-CRP levels. At present, only one paper has been published on the prognostic value of the hs-CRP in patients with colorectal cancer [25]. The retrospective study in question evaluated a population heterogeneous for clinical stage and chemotherapy. We assessed hs-CRP in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer at baseline and 2 months after beginning chemotherapy. As far as we know, our study is the first in the literature to assess the prognostic value of hs-CRP in patients with CRC treated with B. All the inflammatory conditions unrelated to the tumor that could have interfered with the hs-CRP assay were among the exclusion criteria of the ITACa trial [22]. Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was found to improve survival in both first- and second-line settings when added to chemotherapy. Notably, the results from the present study indicate that B is capable of cancelling the negative predictive value of high baseline hs-CRP (≥ 13.1 mg/L) that remain high after 2 months' therapy, but also of low baseline hs-CRP (< 13.1 mg/L) that increases during the same period of treatment. One explanation for this could be that increased IL-6 levels (and, indirectly, hs-CRP values) are an indicator of elevated levels of VEGF [26, 27]. IL-6 enhances the production of VEGF by fibroblasts, thereby inducing angiogenesis [28]. Several studies have hypothesized that VEGF may stimulate angiogenesis in colon cancer, and this is strongly supported by results showing that bevacizumab-induced VEGF inhibition leads to decreased angiogenesis and the abrogation of cancer growth [22, 29]. Inflammation may interfere with various stages of hemostasis, either through the activation of coagulation or the inhibition of fibrinolysis and anticoagulant pathways [30]. As previously reported, the potential correlation between hs-CRP values and the risk of thrombosis and cardiovascular disease led us to evaluate the incidence of VTE in our patients. Although our data failed to confirm that hs-CRP is predictive of the risk of thromboembolic events, it is noteworthy that hs-CRP values in patients who developed thrombosis tended to increase during the course of treatment. In conclusion, pre-treatment serum CRP levels may constitute a marker of aggressiveness in CRC patients. Elevated CRP levels prior to initial treatment would seem to be indicative of poor prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The ITACa trial

Our study was conducted on 132 patients enrolled in the ITACa trial [22] for whom biological material was available. Patients were randomized to receive first-line chemotherapy (CT) (FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI) only or CT plus bevacizumab (B). FOLFOX4 consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1 and leucovorin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m2 and a 22-hour infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m2 on days 1–2 every 2 weeks. FOLFIRI consisted of the same 5-FU + leucovorin regimen with the addition of irinotecan 180 mg/m2 as a 90-minute infusion on day 1. B was administered as a 30- to 90-minute intravenous infusion at a dose of 5 mg/kg on day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Treatment was to be continued until disease progression (PD), withdrawal of consent or unacceptable toxicity, whichever came first. Tumor assessment tests were performed within 28 days of the start of the study treatment and repeated every 8 weeks during treatment until PD. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines were used to define all responses. An independent central review of patient scans was not carried out. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) for Adverse Events, Version 3. We considered both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism for VTE. Thrombosis caused by infusion devices was excluded. The study was performed in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee for each study site and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Participation in this study was not mandatory for patients enrolled in the ITACa clinical trial.

Blood collection

Samples of peripheral blood (3 ml) were collected from each patient at baseline and after 2 months' treatment with first-line chemotherapy. After collection, serum was separated by centrifugation and the supernatant was immediately transferred into cryovials and stored at −80°C.

hs-CRP assay

After thawing serum samples at room temperature, hs-CRP was determined by particle enhanced immune-turbidometric assay using Cobas 6000 Analyser and dedicated reagents (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Anti-CRP antibodies coupled to latex microparticles reacted with CRP in the sample to form an antigen/antibody complex. This led to agglutination and turbidity of the reaction mixture, which was proportional to the CRP concentration and measured quantitatively. The lower detection limit of the hs-CRP assay was 0.15 mg/L and the functional sensitivity 0.3 mg/L; the within-run precision (CV) was 1.6% at 0.54 mg/L and 0.4% at 15.9 mg/L, while the intermediate precision was 8.4% at 0.53 mg/L and 2.1% at 13.3 mg/L.

Statistical analysis

The objectives of this secondary analysis were to examine the association between baseline hs-PCR levels and PFS and OS in the ITACa population, and to investigate their effect on PFS and OS of the addition of B to standard CT in the 2 different hs-PCR subgroups. The data cut-off for analysis was 31st December 2013, when the median duration of follow-up was 36 months (range 1–65). PFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the first documentation of PD (as per investigator assessment), or death from any cause. Patients undergoing curative metastasectomy were censored at the time of surgery. OS was defined as the time interval between random assignment and death or last follow-up visit. PFS, OS and their two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and curves were compared by the log-rank test (at a significance level of 5%). The distribution of raw serum baseline hs-CRP data was skewed (data not shown) but was symmetric after log transformation. For this reason, the log-transformed hs-CRP level was used to observe the relationship between continuous hs-CRP levels and PFS and OS. We performed ROC curve analysis to determine the best threshold of hs-PCR levels to predict PD at 9 months. Estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and their two-sided 95% CI were calculated using the Cox proportional-hazard model. HRs adjusted by baseline characteristics (gender, age, performance status, KRAS status, tumor localization (rectum/colon) and chemotherapy regimen (FOLFOX4/FOLFIRI)) were calculated using the Cox proportional-hazard model. Covariate selection was based on a list of suspected prognostic factors derived from the ITACa study [22]. The effect of the interaction between hs-CRP levels and treatment on PFS/OS was evaluated using Cox regression models of the entire population (CT + B and CT only arms) including hs-CRP levels, treatment, and treatment by hs-CRP levels. We also used nonparametric test to examine the potential correlation between baseline/second sample hs-CRP levels and disease progression or therapy regimen in 107 patients for whom sequential hs-CRP data were available. All p values were based on two-sided testing. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS statistical software version 9.3 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
  29 in total

1.  Development of a new microparticle-enhanced turbidimetric assay for C-reactive protein with superior features in analytical sensitivity and dynamic range.

Authors:  S Eda; J Kaufmann; W Roos; S Pohl
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Preoperative plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 and serum C-reactive protein levels in patients with colorectal cancer. The RANX05 Colorectal Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  H J Nielsen; I J Christensen; S Sørensen; F Moesgaard; N Brünner
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  C-reactive protein is associated with distant metastasis of T3 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ishizuka; Hitoshi Nagata; Kazutoshi Takagi; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction.

Authors:  Bernhard Mlecnik; Marie Tosolini; Amos Kirilovsky; Anne Berger; Gabriela Bindea; Tchao Meatchi; Patrick Bruneval; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Franck Pagès; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  C-reactive protein is a prognostic parameter in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Stephan Polterauer; Christoph Grimm; Clemens Tempfer; Gerhard Sliutz; Paul Speiser; Alexander Reinthaller; Lukas A Hefler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Interleukin-6 increases vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Shih-Pei Huang; Ming-Shiang Wu; Chia-Tung Shun; Hsiu-Po Wang; Ming-Tsan Lin; Min-Liang Kuo; Jaw-Town Lin
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.410

7.  Serum C-reactive protein levels predict survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sakae Nagaoka; Takafumi Yoshida; Junji Akiyoshi; Jun Akiba; Takuji Torimura; Hisashi Adachi; Junichi Kurogi; Nobuyoshi Tajiri; Kinya Inoue; Takashi Niizeki; Hironori Koga; Tsutomu Imaizumi; Masamichi Kojiro; Michio Sata
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.828

8.  Interleukin-6 and asymmetric dimethylarginine are associated with platelet activation after percutaneous angioplasty with stent implantation.

Authors:  Thomas Gremmel; Thomas Perkmann; Christoph W Kopp; Daniela Seidinger; Beate Eichelberger; Renate Koppensteiner; Sabine Steiner; Simon Panzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cancer.

Authors:  Seounghee Lee; Jae-Won Choe; Hong-Kyu Kim; Joohon Sung
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Clinical significances of preoperative serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein level in operable gastric cancer.

Authors:  Do-Kyong Kim; Sung Yong Oh; Hyuk-Chan Kwon; Suee Lee; Kyung A Kwon; Byung Geun Kim; Seong-Geun Kim; Sung-Hyun Kim; Jin Seok Jang; Min Chan Kim; Kyeong Hee Kim; Jin-Yeong Han; Hyo-Jin Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prognostic role of a new index (multi inflammatory index) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the randomized ITACa trial.

Authors:  Andrea Casadei Gardini; Emanuela Scarpi; Martina Valgiusti; Manlio Monti; Silvia Ruscelli; Laura Matteucci; Giulia Bartolini; Bernadette Vertogen; Flavia Pagan; Giulia Rovesti; Giovanni Luca Frassineti; Alessandro Passardi
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) is a novel prognostic indicator in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiayu Zhu; Hua Wang; Cheng-Cheng Liu; Yue Lu; Hailin Tang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Predictive preoperative clinical score for patients with liver-only oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Filippini Velázquez; S Schiele; M Gerken; S Neumaier; C Hackl; P Mayr; M Klinkhammer-Schalke; G Illerhaus; H J Schlitt; M Anthuber; T Kröncke; H Messmann; B Märkl; C Schmid; M Trepel; G Müller; R Claus; B Hackanson
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  The significance of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio as a marker for predicting survival and monitoring chemotherapeutic effectiveness in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masatsune Shibutani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Hisashi Nagahara; Yasuhito Iseki; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-18

5.  Right- vs. Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Differences in Tumor Biology and Bevacizumab Efficacy.

Authors:  Paola Ulivi; Emanuela Scarpi; Elisa Chiadini; Giorgia Marisi; Martina Valgiusti; Laura Capelli; Andrea Casadei Gardini; Manlio Monti; Silvia Ruscelli; Giovanni Luca Frassineti; Daniele Calistri; Dino Amadori; Alessandro Passardi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein as prognostic biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maria Thomsen; Christian Kersten; Halfdan Sorbye; Eva Skovlund; Bengt Glimelius; Per Pfeiffer; Julia S Johansen; Elin H Kure; Tone Ikdahl; Kjell Magne Tveit; Thoralf Christoffersen; Tormod Kyrre Guren
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-15

7.  The High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Predicts Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes after Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tak Kyu Oh; Young-Rok Choi; Jai Young Cho; Yoo-Suk Yoon; Ho-Seong Han; In Sun Park; Jung-Hee Ryu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Preoperative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to lymphocyte ratio index plays a vital role in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection.

Authors:  Minjun Liao; Pu Chen; Yan Liao; Jun Li; Wenmin Yao; Tian Sun; Weijia Liao; Lili Su
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Inflammatory Markers and MicroRNAs: The Backstage Actors Influencing Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Rihab Nasr; Miza Salim Hammoud; Farah Nassar; Deborah Mukherji; Ali Shamseddine; Sally Temraz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.