| Literature DB >> 26848624 |
Andrea Casadei Gardini1, Silvia Carloni2, Emanuela Scarpi3, Paolo Maltoni4, Romolo M Dorizzi4, Alessandro Passardi1, Giovanni Luca Frassineti1, Pietro Cortesi1, Maria Benedetta Giannini1, Giorgia Marisi2, Dino Amadori1, Alessandro Lucchesi1.
Abstract
Serum levels of C-reactive protein are (CRP) higher in patients with neoplastic conditions and numerous studies have been performed to clarify the etiologic and prognostic role of the high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) in cancer. Our study was conducted on patients enrolled in the prospective randomized "Italian Trial in Advanced Colorectal Cancer (ITACa)" to assess hs-CRP levels and their impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Serum samples from 132 ITACa patients were collected at baseline and 2 months after starting first-line chemotherapy. The supernatant was immediately transferred to cryovials and stored at -80°C. After thawing, hs-CRP was measured with the Cobas c501 analyzer. High levels of hs-CRP (≥ 13.1 mg/L) were associated with poorer median PFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p < 0.0001) than low hs-CRP levels (< 13.1 mg/L). hs-CRP values in 107 patients were evaluated again after 2 months of therapy, revealing that patients with low hs-CRP levels in both baseline and second serum samples had the best median PFS and OS. Our study confirms the prognostic value of hs-CRP in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; metastatic colorectal cancer; overall survival; progression-free survival; thrombosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26848624 PMCID: PMC4891113 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Flow chart of the study
Patient characteristics (n = 132)
| No. (%) | |
|---|---|
| 67 (34–83) | |
| < 70 | 74 (56.1) |
| ≥ 70 | 58 (43.9) |
| Males | 78 (59.1) |
| Females | 54 (40.9) |
| 0 | 110 (83.3) |
| 1–2 | 22 (16.7) |
| Rectum | 37 (28.0) |
| Colon | 95 (72.0) |
| I–III | 31 (23.5) |
| IV | 101 (76.5) |
| FOLFOX4 | 79 (59.8) |
| FOLFIRI | 53 (40.2) |
| Wild type | 75 (59.1) |
| Mutated | 52 (40.9) |
| Unknown/missing | 6 |
| CT + B | 67 (50.8) |
| CT | 65 (49.2) |
| Only liver | 37 (28.0) |
| Other | 95 (72.0) |
| Cardiovascular | 64 (48.1) |
| Pulmonary | 4 (3.0) |
| Gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary | 10 (7.5) |
| Metabolic/endocrine | 25 (18.8) |
| Musculoskeletal | 4 (3.0) |
| Dermatologic | 1 (0.7) |
| Reproductive | 1 (0.7) |
| Renal/urinary tracts | 3 (2.3) |
| Allergy | 0 |
| Neurologic/psychiatric | 22 (16.5) |
CT, chemotherapy; B, bevacizumab.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curves of progression-free survival (PFS) (A), overall survival (OS) (B) for 132 patients
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS in patients treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (A), chemotherapy alone (B) and OS in patients treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (C), chemotherapy alone (D)
PFS and OS: stratification of 107 patients into different groups with respect to hs-CRP changes
| PFS | OS | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. patients | No. events | Median PFS (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | No. events | Median OS (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||||
| 58 | 48 | 12.6(10.2–16.0) | 1.00 | 36 | 29.2(25.2–36.7) | 1.00 | |||||
| 9 | 9 | 7.4(2.9–10.0) | 2.84(1.37–5.88) | 0.005 | 7 | 18.2(3.7–33.1) | 2.37(1.05–5.37) | 0.038 | |||
| 28 | 25 | 9.1(8.9–11.4) | 1.95(1.18–3.21) | 0.009 | 21 | 15.0(13.1–23.3) | 2.54(1.47–4.39) | 0.0008 | |||
| 12 | 12 | 9.4(3.1–15.7) | 0.002 | 2.14(1.13–4.08) | 0.020 | 10 | 14.8(9.0–28.6) | 0.0004 | 3.02(1.48–6.20) | 0.002 | |
PFS and OS: stratification of 107 patients in two main groups with respect to hs-CRP changes after two months' therapy
| PFS | OS | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. patients | No. events | Median PFS (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | No. events | Median OS (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||||
| 86 | 73 | 11.4(9.3–14.0) | 1.00 | 57 | 25.2(22.3–29.2) | 1.00 | |||||
| 21 | 21 | 8.6(6.1–10.3) | 0.007 | 1.95(1.19–3.19) | 0.008 | 17 | 15.3(11.5–28.6) | 0.008 | 2.08(1.20–3.62) | 0.009 | |
| 40 | 35 | 11.3(9.0–15.0) | 1.00 | 26 | 27.3(23.3–36.6) | 1.00 | |||||
| 13 | 13 | 7.4(6.0–10.3) | 0.017 | 2.19(1.13–4.24) | 0.020 | 12 | 14.4(11.6–20.8) | 0.0009 | 3.16(1.54–6.47) | 0.002 | |
| 46 | 38 | 11.9(9.1–14.9) | 1.00 | 31 | 24.8(19.3–34.5) | 1.00 | |||||
| 8 | 8 | 9.1(2.9–15.9) | 0.204 | 1.64(0.76–3.54) | 0.210 | 5 | 24.5(3.7-nr) | 0.675 | 1.23(0.47–3.19) | 0.675 | |
nr:not reached.
Figure 4Mean change in hs-CRP from baseline in chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (CT + B) and chemotherapy (CT) arms
Figure 5Mean change in hs-CRP from baseline as a function of venous thromboembolism (VTE)