Literature DB >> 26848295

Ovarian function and ovarian blood supply following premenopausal abdominal hysterectomy.

Ibrahim A Abdelazim1, Khaled M Abdelrazak2, Assem A M Elbiaa3, Mohamed M Farghali2, Amr Essam2, Gulmira Zhurabekova4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The issue of conserving the ovaries at hysterectomy in premenopausal women with benign gynecologic disease has been the subject of considerable controversy. Some clinicians prefer prophylactic oophorectomy in premenopausal women during hysterectomy to prevent future development of malignant changes in conserved ovaries. Other clinicians prefer to conserve apparently normal ovaries, because bilateral oophorectomy in premenopausal women results in an abrupt imbalance, sudden onset of menopausal symptoms, decreased libido, increased cardiovascular risk and osteoporosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty multipara women (who had completed their families), with benign uterine pathology were included in this prospective study for abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral ovarian preservation. Pre-operative vaginal ultrasound, Doppler studies, diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy were done followed by laboratory studies including Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol for all studied women. Doppler studies, AMH, FSH and estradiol were repeated 6 and 12 months post-operative for assessment of the ovarian function and ovarian blood supply after hysterectomy.
RESULTS: Pre-operative AMH, FSH and estradiol of the studied women were statistically insignificant compared to AMH, FSH and estradiol 6 and 12 months post-operative. Twelve months post-operative right and left ovarian volumes (6.92 ± 0.18 and 6.85 ± 0.19 cm(3), respectively) were significantly larger than pre-operative right and left ovarian volumes (6.19 ± 0.22 and 5.86 ± 0.23 cm(3), respectively), and, 12 months post-operative right and left ovarian pulsatility indices (2.92 ± 0.15 and 2.96 ± 0.16 cm/s, respectively) were significantly lower than pre-operative right and left ovarian pulsatility indices (3.45 ± 0.19 and 3.36 ± 0.2 cm/s, respectively). Eight (3.6%) cases of the studied women developed an ovarian cyst 6 months after hysterectomy, 3 were spontaneously resolved and the remaining 5 (2.27%) cases underwent exploratory laparotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of ovarian dysfunction affecting conserved ovaries one year after hysterectomy in premenopausal women as evident by AMH, FSH and estradiol. Furthermore, an increased ovarian volume and reduced ovarian pulsatility indices indicate a possible increase in ovarian blood supply, and preserved non-compromised ovarian function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal hysterectomy; blood supply; function; ovarian; premenopausal

Year:  2015        PMID: 26848295      PMCID: PMC4733897          DOI: 10.5114/pm.2015.56312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny        ISSN: 1643-8876


Introduction

The issue of conserving the ovaries at hysterectomy in premenopausal women with benign gynecologic disease has been the subject of considerable controversy [1-5]. Some clinicians prefer prophylactic oophorectomy in premenopausal women during hysterectomy to prevent future development of malignant changes in conserved ovaries [6-16]. Other clinicians prefer to conserve apparently normal ovaries, because bilateral oophorectomy in premenopausal women results in an abrupt imbalance, sudden onset of menopausal symptoms, decreased libido, increased cardiovascular risk and osteoporosis [17-23]. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effect of premenopausal hysterectomy on the conserved ovarian function. Some research indicates an increase in incidence and severity of menopausal symptoms following removal of the uterus despite the ovaries remaining in place, which may be due to reduction in ovarian blood flow and follicular atresia [6]. Animal studies (rat models) concluded that hysterectomy with ovarian conservation could preserve a normal hormonal milieu but might accelerate the onset of early menopause [24, 25]. This prospective study was designed to detect the effect of premenopausal abdominal hysterectomy on the ovarian function and ovarian blood supply.

Material and methods

Two hundred and twenty (220) women with benign uterine pathology were included in this study for abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral ovarian preservation which was conducted in Ahmadi, Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) and Sabah Maternity Hospitals, Kuwait, from January 2012 to January 2014. Women included in this study were 38-45 years old, multipara (had completed their families), with benign uterine pathology. Women planning future pregnancy or with other gynecological problems indicating alternative surgery such as endometriosis or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or ovarian masses were excluded from this study and women who had one or both ovaries removed in a previous surgery or malignant pelvic pathology or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) of more than 20 IU/ml (on at least two sessions) were also excluded from this study. Women were included in this study after informed consent, proper counseling and approval of the study protocol by the institute's ethics committee. After complete history, physical examination, preoperative vaginal ultrasound, Doppler studies, diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy were done for all studied women, followed by pre-operative laboratory studies including Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), FSH and estradiol. Doppler studies, AMH, FSH and estradiol were repeated 6 and 12 months post-operative for assessment of the ovarian function and blood supply after abdominal hysterectomy. Blood samples were collected from women included in this study pre-operative, 6 and 12 months after hysterectomy in plain tubes, centrifuged and serum samples were stored at –20°C. AMH, FSH and estradiol levels in serum were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) using Elecsys Kits (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Ovarian volume was measured in the pelvic infundibulum by transvaginal ultrasound and Doppler ultrasonography was used to assess the ovarian flow velocity waveform by measuring the Pulsatility Index (PI; cm/s) pre-operative, and 6 and 12 months after hysterectomy. All examinations were conducted during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle by the same investigator, in the afternoon. In hysterectomized women, the follicular phase was determined by the absence of both a dominant follicle and corpus luteum [18]. Doppler ultrasonography of the ovarian arteries was done at the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle because flow is reduced and similar in both ovaries during this period [18]. Transvaginal ultrasound and Doppler studies were done using Philips HD9 (Philips International; Amsterdam; Netherlands) with a two-dimensional endo-vaginal convex probe 4-9 MHz by a sonographer who was blinded to the patients’ criteria. Baseline measures included transverse (T), antero-posterior (AP), and longitudinal (L) diameters of both ovaries and ovarian volume (V), was estimated using the formula V (cm) = T (Cm) × AP (Cm) × L (Cm) × 0.52. Left and right ovarian artery flow in the pelvic infundibulum was visualized with the color Doppler technique and the typical velocity spectrum of this vessel was determined. Blood flow impedance was expressed as the PI (cm/s). The PI values were calculated electronically according to the formula PI = peak systolic velocity – minimum diastolic velocity/mean flow velocity.

Sample size justification

The required sample size was calculated using G* Power software version 3.17 for sample size calculation (*Heinrich Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany), setting α-error probability at 0.05, power (1 – β error probability) at 0.95% and effective sample size (w) at 0.3. The effective size (w) was calculated as follows:W =√χ/N, where χ is the chi-square test and N is the total sample size. The number of participants needed to produce a statistically acceptable figure was 220 women.

Statistical analysis

Data were collected, tabulated, then statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) computer software version 18. Numerical variables were presented as mean and standard deviation (± SD), while categorical variables were presented as a number and percentage. Student t-test was used for comparison between groups as regards quantitative variables. A difference with a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Mean age of premenopausal women included in this study for hysterectomy was 42.3 ± 8.7 years, parity was 4.9 ± 1.6 and body mass index (BMI) was 32.1 ± 2.07 kg/m2. Hysterectomy was indicated for studied women due to fibroid uterus 131 (59.6%) cases (causing pelvic-abdominal mass 51 [23.2%] cases, menorrhagia 47 [21.4%] cases, pelvic pain or pressure 33 [15%] cases), heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) with failed medical and hormonal treatment 52 (23.6%) cases and polymenorrhea 37 (16.8%) cases. The pre-operative histology of endometrium samples showed secretory endometrium in 87 (39.5%) cases, proliferative endometrium in 69 (31.4%) cases, simple endometrial hyperplasia in 36 (16.4%) cases and complex hyperplasia without atypia in 28 (12.7%) cases (Table I).
Tab. I

Indications of hysterectomy for the studied population and preoperative histology of endometrial samples

VariablesNumber (%)
Indication of hysterectomy
Fibroid uterus131 (59.6%)
 Pelvic-abdominal mass51 (23.2%)
 Menorrhagia47 (21.4%)
 Pelvic pain or pressure symptoms33 (15%)
Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB)52 (23.6%)
Polymenorrhea37 (16.8%)
Pre-operative histology of endometrium samples
Secretary endometrium87 (39.5%)
Proliferative endometrium69 (31.4%)
Simple hyperplasia36 (16.4%)
Complex hyperplasia without atypia28 (12.7%)
Indications of hysterectomy for the studied population and preoperative histology of endometrial samples Pre-operative AMH (1.75 ± 4.61 ng/ml) of the studied women was statistically insignificant compared to AMH 6 and 12 months post-operative (1.78 ± 2.45 and 1.81 ± 2.19 ng/ml, respectively) and pre-operative FSH (7.98 ± 5.7 IU/ml) was statistically insignificant compared to FSH 6 and 12 months post-operative (8.26 ± 5.4 and 8.55 ± 6.2 IU/ml, respectively), also, pre-operative estradiol (129 ± 57.3 pg/ml) was statistically insignificant compared to estradiol 6 and 12 months post-operative (134.5 ± 66.2 and 139.3 ± 77.1 pg/ml, respectively) (Table II).
Tab. II

Preoperative and postoperative Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol, ovarian volume, ovarian Pulsatility Index (PI) of the studied population

VariablesPreoperative6 months postoperative12 months postoperativeP value (95% CI) test used
AMH (ng/ml), mean ± SD1.75 ± 4.611.78 ± 2.451.81 ± 2.19P1 = 0** (CI: –0.71; –0.03; 0.65), t testP2 = 0** (CI: –0.73; –0.06; 0.61), t test
FSH (IU/ml), mean ± SD7.98 ± 5.78.26 ± 5.48.55 ± 6.2P1 = 0.21** (CI: –1.31; –0.28; 0.75), t testP2 = 0.89** (CI: –1.68; –0.57; 0.54), t test
Estradiol (pg/ml), mean ± SD129.0 ± 57.3134.5 ± 66.2139.3 ± 77.1P1 = 0.98** (CI: –17.0; –5.5; 0.06), t testP2 = 0.99** (CI: –22.9; –10.3; 2.39), t test
Right ovarian volume (cm3), mean ± SD6.19 ± 0.226.75 ± 0.256.92 ± 0.18P1 = 0.97** (–0.60; –0.56; –0.51), t testP2 = 0.001* (–0.82; –0.79; –0.75), t test
Left ovarian volume (cm3), mean ± SD5.86 ± 0.236.57 ± 1.126.85 ± 0.19P1 = 1** (–0.86; –0.71; –0.55), t testP2 = 0.002* (–1.02; –0.99; –0.95), t test
Right ovary Pulsatility Index (cm/s), mean ± SD3.45 ± 0.193.12 ± 0.212.92 ± 0.15P1 = 0.9** (0.29; 0.33; 0.36), t testP2 = 0.002* (0.48; 0.53; 0.56), t test
Left ovary Pulsatility Index (cm/s), mean ± SD3.36 ± 0.23.07 ± 0.212.96 ± 0.16P1 = 0.9** (0.25; 0.2; 0.32), t testP2 = 0.0005* (0.36; 0.4; 0.43), t test

Non-significant, Significant

P1 – p for preoperative values compared to 6 months postoperative values, P2 – p for preoperative values compared to 12 months postoperative values, t test – Student t-test, cm/s – cm/second

Preoperative and postoperative Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol, ovarian volume, ovarian Pulsatility Index (PI) of the studied population Non-significant, Significant P1 – p for preoperative values compared to 6 months postoperative values, P2 – p for preoperative values compared to 12 months postoperative values, t test – Student t-test, cm/s – cm/second Pre-operative right and left ovarian volumes (6.19 ± 0.22 and 5.86 ± 0.23 cm3, respectively) were statistically insignificant compared to 6 months post-operative right and left ovarian volumes (6.75 ± 0.25 and 6.57 ± 1.12 cm3, respectively), and were significantly smaller compared to 12 months post-operative right and left ovarian volumes (6.92 ± 0.18 and 6.85 ± 0.19 cm3, respectively) (Table II). Pre-operative right and left ovarian pulsatility indices (3.45 ± 0.19 and 3.36 ± 0.2 cm/s, respectively) were statistically insignificant compared to 6 months post-operative right and left ovarian pulsatility indices (3.12 ± 0.21 and 3.07 ± 0.21 cm/s, respectively), and were significantly higher compared to 12 months post-operative right and left ovary pulsatility indices (2.92 ± 0.15 and 2.96 ± 0.16 cm/s, respectively) (Table II). Eight (3.6%) cases of the studied women developed an ovarian cyst 6 months after hysterectomy, 3 were spontaneously resolved and the remaining 5 (2.27%) cases underwent exploratory laparotomy which revealed 3 cases of serous cystadenoma and 2 cases of a paraovarian cyst.

Discussion

In this study, there is no evidence of ovarian dysfunction affecting conserved ovaries one year after abdominal hysterectomy in premenopausal women as evident by AMH, FSH and estradiol. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effect of premenopausal hysterectomy on the ovarian function. Some research indicates an increase in incidence and severity of menopausal symptoms and ovarian failure following removal of the uterus, despite the ovaries remaining in place [26], whereas others report no decrease in ovarian function [26]. The advance of menopause age after hysterectomy is related to an increased rate of follicular atresia (surgical removal of uterus will increase follicular atresia in conserved ovaries) [27]. The presence of uterus would inhibit follicle depletion or atresia and its surgical removal at reproductive age would accelerate follicular loss, atresia and subsequent accelerated menopause [27]. Other hypothesis, the increased prevalence of ovarian failure after hysterectomy, is due to stretch and thrombosis of ovarian blood vessels with a subsequent reduction in ovarian blood supply [17, 27, 28]. Deng et al. concluded that hysterectomy with the conservation of bilateral/unilateral ovaries may have some influence on the ovarian function [17], also, Ahn et al. concluded that total abdominal hysterectomy accelerates ovarian dysfunction and women treated with total abdominal hysterectomy are at risk of early menopause [6]. On the contrary, Ylikorkala and Viinikka studied pituitary-ovarian function in 2 women with congenital absence of the uterus and vagina (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome) and concluded that presence or absence of the uterus does not affect the ovarian function [29]. In this study, pre-operative AMH, FSH and estradiol were statistically insignificant compared to AMH, FSH and estradiol 6 and 12 months after abdominal hysterectomy, also, Chalmers et al., concluded that there is no evidence of compromise of the ovarian function, as reflected in FSH levels, within 2 years of hysterectomy [19]. Findley et al. concluded that laparoscopic hysterectomy ± salpingectomy with ovarian preservation does not appear to have any short-term deleterious effects on ovarian reserve, as measured by the AMH level [30]. Morelli et al. compared women treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) plus bilateral salpingectomy, with women treated by TLH without adnexectomy and they found no significant difference between two groups regarding AMH, FSH, antral follicle count (AFC), mean ovarian diameters and peak systolic velocity [31]. Recently, Venturella et al. has concluded that OvAge is one of the first reliable attempts to create a new method able to identify ovarian reserve [32, 33]. Although, Ishii et al. found that fifteen of 33 patients became climacteric after premenopausal radical hysterectomy for stage IB and II cervical cancer with ovarian preservation, they also found a significant correlation between ovarian dysfunction after radical hysterectomy and age [34]. Petri Nahás et al. found that ovarian volumes were greater 6 and 12 months after total abdominal hysterectomy compared to controls and they found reduced PI of ovarian vessels of hysterectomized women compared to controls [18]. They concluded that the reduced PI of ovarian vessels of hysterectomized women indicates decreased resistance with a subsequent increased ovarian blood flow in hysterectomized women compared to controls, also, in this study, 12 months post-operative right and left ovarian volumes (6.92 ± 0.18 and 6.85 ± 0.19 cm3, respectively) were significantly larger than pre-operative right and left ovarian volumes (6.19 ± 0.22 and 5.86 ± 0.23 cm3, respectively), and, 12 months post-operative right and left ovary pulsatility indices (2.92 ± 0.15 and 2.96 ± 0.16 cm/s, respectively) were significantly lower than pre-operative right and left ovarian pulsatility indices (3.45 ± 0.19 and 3.36 ± 0.2 cm/s, respectively) [18]. Five to eight percent of hysterectomized women require subsequent surgeries for benign ovarian diseases [5]. The post-hysterectomy ovarian cysts appear within the first post-operative year and spontaneously resolved in more than 50% of cases, and most of these cysts are functional cysts [35]. Zalel et al. found ovarian cysts in 50.7% of hysterectomized women (37/73) and Pete et al. found ovarian cysts in 9.2% of hysterectomized women (6/65) [36, 37]. Four women were lost during follow up (excluded from the study) and short duration of post-operative follow up (one year) were the two limitations faced during this study.

Conclusions

There is no evidence of ovarian dysfunction affecting conserved ovaries one year after hysterectomy in premenopausal women as evident by AMH, FSH and estradiol. Furthermore, an increased ovarian volume and reduced ovarian PI indicates a possible increase in ovarian blood supply, and preserved, non-compromised ovarian function.
  26 in total

1.  Ovarian function after radical hysterectomy with ovarian preservation for cervical cancer.

Authors:  K Ishii; Y Aoki; K Takakuwa; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Effects of hysterectomy on ovarian morphology and serum FSH level in rats.

Authors:  S Ozdamar; H Ulger; H Cetin Sorkun; I Müderris
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Hysterectomized women with ovarian conservation report more severe climacteric complaints than do normal climacteric women of similar age.

Authors:  A Oldenhave; L J Jaszmann; W T Everaerd; A A Haspels
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Effect of total abdominal hysterectomy on ovarian blood supply in women of reproductive age.

Authors:  Eliana Aguiar Petri Nahás; Anaglória Pontes; Jorge Nahas-Neto; Vera Therezinha Medeiros Borges; Rogério Dias; Paulo Traiman
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  The fate of the retained ovaries following radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  I Pete; P Bõsze
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 0.196

6.  Effect of hysterectomy on conserved ovarian function.

Authors:  Eun Hee Ahn; Sang Wook Bai; Chan Ho Song; Jeong Yeon Kim; Kyung Ah Jeong; Sei Kwang Kim; Jai Sung Lee; Ja Yung Kwon; Ki Hyun Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  The effect of hysterectomy and endometrial ablation on follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels up to 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  J G Derksen; H A Brölmann; M A Wiegerinck; H L Vader; A P Heintz
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The immunohistochemical expression of CD24 and CD171 adhesion molecules in borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Alexandra Moulla; Dimosthenis Miliaras; Antonia Sioga; Aikaterini Kaidoglou; Louisa Economou
Journal:  Pol J Pathol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.072

9.  OvAge: a new methodology to quantify ovarian reserve combining clinical, biochemical and 3D-ultrasonographic parameters.

Authors:  Roberta Venturella; Daniela Lico; Alessia Sarica; Maria Pia Falbo; Elio Gulletta; Michele Morelli; Errico Zupi; Gabriele Cevenini; Mario Cannataro; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  Laparoscopy in elective and emergency management of ovarian pathology in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Andrzej Grabowski; Wojciech Korlacki; Michał Pasierbek
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.195

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does Saving Uterus Save Ovaries?

Authors:  Suvarna Khadilkar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-03-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.