| Literature DB >> 26848294 |
Wanda Barbara Pilch1, Dariusz Mikołaj Mucha2, Tomasz Adam Pałka3, Agnieszka Ewa Suder1, Anna Małgorzata Piotrowska1, Anna Katarzyna Tyka4, Łukasz Marcin Tota3, Tadeusz Ambroży2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: For years there have been studies on what kind of physical activity is optimal for maintaining proper health condition. Besides well known and approved endurance training of moderate intensity, an importance of interval exercise where short term, sudden intensification of work is performed at low endurance load is emphasized. The aim of the work was to assess the effects of a program of physical activity applied to postmenopausal women regarding improvement of their body composition and biochemical indices of lipid and carbohydrate status.Entities:
Keywords: HDL; LDL; Nordic walking; insulin sensitivity
Year: 2015 PMID: 26848294 PMCID: PMC4733896 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2015.56311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prz Menopauzalny ISSN: 1643-8876
Changes of selected indices of the lipid and carbohydrate profile before and after the program of physical activity in the examined women
| Index | Examination before | Examination after | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC [mmol/l] | 6.02 ± 1.43 | 5.70 ± 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.001 |
| HDL-C [mmol/l] | 1.39 ± 0.37 | 1.46 ± 0.30 | 0.07 | 0.001 |
| LDL-C [mmol/l] | 3.94 ± 1.32 | 3.57 ± 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.001 |
| TG [mmol/l] | 1.55 ± 0.67 | 1.51 ± 0.49 | 0.04 | N.S. |
| G [mmol/l] | 5.19 ± 0.83 | 5.01 ± 0.72 | 0.18 | N.S. |
| I [mU/ml] | 8.15 ± 3.93 | 5.94 ± 2.28 | 2.21 | 0.001 |
| HOMAIR | 1.96 ± 1.31 | 1.37 ± 0.88 | 0.59 | 0.001 |
| AIP | 0.02 ± 0.26 | 0.00 ± 0.19 | 0.02 | N.S. |
| WRM | 2.84 ± 1.86 | 2.50 ± 1.16 | 0.34 | N.S. |
TC – total cholesterol, HDL-C – high density lipoprotein fraction cholesterol, LDL-C – low density lipoprotein fraction cholesterol, TG – triacylglycerols, G – glucose, I – insulin, HOMAIR – insulin resistance index, AIP – atherogenicity index of plasma lipoproteins, WRM – atherosclerosis risk index, N.S. – statistical significance not found
Changes of body biometrical-structural indices after the program of physical activity in the examined women
| Index | Examination before | Examination after | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH [cm] | 157.92 ± 4.93 | 157.92 ± 4.93 | 0.00 | N.S. |
| BM [kg] | 70.40 ± 12.51 | 71.20 ± 12.56 | 0.80 | N.S. |
| BMI | 28.22 ± 5.00 | 28.55 ± 6.62 | 0.33 | N.S. |
| PF [%] | 30.52 ± 5.73 | 29.87 ± 5.61 | 0.65 | N.S. |
| FM [kg] | 21.48 ± 8.38 | 21.27 ± 9.07 | 0.21 | N.S. |
| LBM [kg] | 48.92 ± 4.81 | 49.93 ± 8.60 | 1.01 | N.S. |
BH – body height, BM – body mass, BMI – body mass index, PF – percentage of fat, FM – fat mass, LBM – lean body mass, N.S. – statistical significance not found
Components of a diet consumed by the participants before the trainings and during the last week of the program (mean values/person/day)
| Components of diet | Before the training | At the end of the training | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy [kcal] | 2047.34 ± 336.19 | 2326.44 ± 308.15 | 279.1 | 0.05 |
| Protein [g] | 86.1 ± 8.02 | 95.4 ± 11.96 | 9.3 | 0.05 |
| Fats [g] | 70.5 ± 27.22 | 95.16 ± 29.12 | 24.66 | 0.05 |
| Carbohydrates [g] | 267.11 ± 61.11 | 272.1 ± 61.94 | 4.99 | N.S. |
N.S. – statistical significance not found