Literature DB >> 26847112

Long-Term Outcome of Incomplete Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry).

Kristina Hambraeus1, Karin Jensevik2, Bo Lagerqvist3, Bertil Lindahl3, Roland Carlsson4, Ramin Farzaneh-Far5, Thomas Kellerth6, Elmir Omerovic7, Gregg Stone8, Christoph Varenhorst3, Stefan James3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe current practice regarding completeness of revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to investigate the association of incomplete revascularization (IR) with death, repeat revascularization, and myocardial infarction (MI) in a large nationwide registry.
BACKGROUND: The benefits of multivessel PCI are controversial.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010 we identified 23,342 patients with multivessel disease in the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry) and merged data with official Swedish health data registries. IR was defined as any nontreated significant (60%) stenosis in a coronary artery supplying >10% of the myocardium.
RESULTS: Patients with IR (n = 15,165) were older, had more extensive coronary disease, and more often had ST-segment elevation MI at presentation than those with complete revascularization (CR) (n = 8,177). All-cause 1-year mortality, MI, and repeat revascularization were higher in IR than CR: 7.1% versus 3.8%, 10.4% versus 6.0%, and 20.5% versus 8.5%, respectively. Propensity score methodology was used in the adjusted analyses. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the composite of death, MI, or repeat revascularization at 1 year was higher in IR than CR: 2.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98 to 2.28; p < 0.0001). Adjusted HR for death and the combination of death/MI were 1.29 (95% CI: 1.12 to 1.49; p = 0.0005) and 1.42 (95% CI: 1.30 to 1.56; p < 0.0001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete revascularization at the time of hospital discharge in patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI is associated with a high risk of recurrent 1-year adverse cardiac events.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCI; incomplete revascularization; multivessel disease; registry study

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26847112     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  11 in total

1.  Development of a Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry with a Data Management Approach: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alireza Tabatabaei Tabrizi; Hamid Moghaddasi; Reza Rabiei; Babak Sharif-Kashani; And Eslam Nazemi
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2019-01-01

2.  Completeness of revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yader Sandoval; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Santiago Garcia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Association of Coronary Vessel Characteristics With Outcome in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Incomplete Revascularization.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Ye Zhong; Peter B Berger; Alice K Jacobs; Gary Walford; Frederick S K Ling; Ferdinand J Venditti; Spencer B King
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Impact of completeness of revascularisation on long-term outcomes in patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI: CR versus IR outcomes in multivessel CAD.

Authors:  Pravin Goel; Ankit Sahu; Manas Layek; Roopali Khanna; Prabhakar Mishra
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2021-07

5.  Residual SYNTAX Score and One-Year Outcome in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Nuccia Morici; Gianfranco Alicandro; Luca A Ferri; Luigi Piatti; Daniele Grosseto; Paolo Sganzerla; Giovanni Tortorella; Maurizio Ferrario; Gabriele Crimi; Irene Bossi; Stefano Tondi; Anna Sonia Petronio; Matteo Mariani; Anna Toso; Amelia Ravera; Elena Corrada; Davide Cao; Leonardo Di Ascenzo; Carlo La Vecchia; Stefano De Servi; Stefano Savonitto
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-03-20

Review 6.  Hemodynamic Support Devices for Shock and High-Risk PCI: When and Which One.

Authors:  George W Vetrovec
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  ECMO in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  L C Napp; C Kühn; J Bauersachs
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Is ischemia the only factor predicting cardiovascular outcomes in all diabetes mellitus patients?

Authors:  Mark W Kennedy; Enrico Fabris; Harry Suryapranata; Elvin Kedhi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 9.  Impact of Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Vinayak Nagaraja; Sze-Yuan Ooi; James Nolan; Adrian Large; Mark De Belder; Peter Ludman; Rodrigo Bagur; Nick Curzen; Takashi Matsukage; Fuminobu Yoshimachi; Chun Shing Kwok; Colin Berry; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Does multivessel revascularization fit all patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Jin Hu; Xiao-Song Li; Chen Jin; Yue-Jin Yang
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.