| Literature DB >> 26846575 |
Aya Aoki1,2, Maiko Inoue3, Elizabeth Nguyen4, Ryo Obata1, Kazuaki Kadonosono3, Shoji Shinkai2, Hideki Hashimoto5, Satoshi Sasaki4, Yasuo Yanagi1,6,7.
Abstract
This case-control study reports the association between nutrient intake and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in Japan. The nutrient intake of 161 neovascular AMD cases from two university hospitals and 369 population-based control subjects from a cohort study was assessed using a brief-type self-administered questionnaire on diet history, which required respondent recall of the usual intake of 58 foods during the preceding month. Energy-adjusted nutrient intake values were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs adjusted for smoking history, age, sex, chronic disease history, supplement use, and alcohol consumption. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that low intakes of n-3 fatty acid, α-tocopherol, zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, and β-carotene were associated with neovascular AMD (Trend P < 0.0001 for n-3 fatty acid, Trend P < 0.0001 for α-tocopherol, Trend P < 0.0001 for zinc, Trend P = 0.002 for vitamin D, Trend P = 0.04 for vitamin C, Trend P = 0.0004 for β-carotene). There was no association with retinol or cryptoxanthin intake and neovascular AMD (P = 0.67, 0.06).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26846575 PMCID: PMC4742947 DOI: 10.1038/srep20723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Basic characteristics of the case subjects and controls.
| Variable | AMD (n = 157) | Control (n = 369) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male (n [%]) | 106 (67.5) | 227 (61.5) | 0.2 |
| Age (years) | 73.5 ± 7.1 | 73.1 ± 5.6 | 0.4 |
| Height (cm) | 160.3 ± 8.1 | 158.1 ± 8.3 | 1.0 |
| Weight (kg) | 58.7 ± 10.4 | 57.9 ± 9.4 | 0.8 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.7 ± 2.9 | 23.1 ± 2.8 | 0.09 |
| Smoking history (n [%]) | 91 (58.0) | 184 (49.9) | 0.09 |
| Hypertension (n [%]) | 81 (51.6) | 181 (49.1) | 0.6 |
| Diabetes (n [%]) | 17 (10.8) | 32 (8.7) | 0.4 |
| Hyperlipidemia (n [%]) | 30 (19.1) | 101 (27.4) | 0.04 |
| Cardiovascular disease (n [%]) | 7 (4.5) | 9 (2.4) | 0.3 |
| Cerebral infarction (n [%]) | 4 (2.6) | 20 (5.4) | 0.1 |
Note: All values are n (%) or mean ± SD. AMD, Age-related macular degeneration.
Energy-adjusted values for specific nutrient intake per day among the case subjects and controls.
| Variable (per day) | AMD (n = 157) | Control (n = 369) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc (mg/d) | 8.4 ± 1.3 | 9.4 ± 1.4 | <0.0001 |
| Retinol (μg/d) | 479.2 ± 407.1 | 526.9 ± 394.8 | 0.2099 |
| Vitamin D (μg/d) | 18.3 ± 10.9 | 21.2 ± 11.5 | 0.0083 |
| α-tocopherol (mg/d) | 7.8 ± 2.2 | 9.2 ± 2.2 | <0.0001 |
| Vitamin C (mg/d) | 132.0 ± 60.6 | 147.2 ± 58.8 | 0.0074 |
| N-3 fatty acid (g/d) | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 3.3 ± 0.9 | <0.0001 |
| β-carotene (μg/d) | 3547.0 ± 2105.9 | 4657.4 ± 2688.9 | <0.0001 |
| Cryptoxanthin (μg/d) | 379.1 ± 376.5 | 341.9 ± 297.3 | 0.2 |
| Average energy intake (kcal/d) | 1916.6 ± 564.1 | 2052.9 ± 559.4 | 0.011 |
Notes: Energy-adjusted values were calculated using the residual model.
Student’s t-test, significant difference noted at p = 0.05.
Notes: All values are mean ± SD.
Associations between dietary intake levels of specific nutrients and neovascular AMD*.
| Variable (per day) | Odds ratio (CI) | Trend P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (Lowest) (n = 105) | Q2 (n = 105) | Q3 (n = 106) | Q4 (n = 105) | Q5 (Highest) (n = 105) | ||
| Zinc (mg/d) | ≤8.0 | 8.0–8.8 | 8.8–9.4 | 9.4–10.2 | ≥10.2 | <0.0001 |
| n of cases/controls | 53/52 | 43/62 | 33/73 | 17/88 | 11/94 | |
| Multivariate adjusted model | 1 (Reference) | 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.8) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) | 0.1 (0.1, 0.4) | |
| Retinol (μgram/d) | ≤278.7 | 279.5–363.0 | 363.5–445.7 | 446.4–713.7 | ≥714.5 | 0.06 |
| n of cases/controls | 38/67 | 37/68 | 24/82 | 36/69 | 22/83 | |
| Multivariate adjusted model | 1 (Reference) | 1.0(0.6, 1.8) | 0.6 (0.3, 1.1) | 1.0 (0.6, 1.9) | 0.5 (0.3 0.9) | |
| Vitamin D (μgram/d) | ≤12.2 | 112.3–15.9 | 5.9–20.4 | 20.4–27.3 | ≥27.5 | 0.002 |
| n of cases/controls | 46/59 | 33/72 | 29/77 | 24/81 | 25/80 | |
| Multivariate adjusted model | 1 (Reference) | 0.6 (0.3, 1.1) | 0.5 (0.3, 0.9) | 0.4(0.2, 0.7) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.8) | |
| α-tocopherol (mg/d) | ≤6.8 | 6.8–8.2 | 8.2–9.3 | 9.3–10.6 | ≥10.6 | <0.0001 |
| n of cases/controls | 54/51 | 40/65 | 21/85 | 26/79 | 16/89 | |
| Multivariate adjusted model | 1 (Reference) | 0.6 (0.3, 1.0) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.6) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) | |
| Vitamin C (mg/d) | ≤94,5 | 94.6–123.2 | 123.3–147.9 | 148.1–184.6 | ≥184.9 | 0.04 |
| n of cases/controls | 45/60 | 30/75 | 26/80 | 31/74 | 25/80 | |
| Multivariate adjusted model | 1 (Reference) | 0.5 (0.3, 0.9) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.8) | 0.5 (0.3, 1.0) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.8) | |
| N-3 fatty acid (g/d) | ≤2.5 | 2.5–3.0 | 3.0–3.4 | 3.4–3.9 | ≥3.9 | < 0.0001 |
| n of cases/controls | 44/61 | 45/60 | 22/84 | 33/72 | 13/92 | |
| Multivariate adjusted model | 1 (Reference) | 1.1 (0.6, 1.8) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.7) | 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) | |
| β-carotene (μgram/d) | ≤ 2296.2 | 2297.3–3489.5 | 3302.3–4463.6 | 4465.2–6023.9 | ≥ 6040.6 | 0.0004 |
| n ofcases/controls | 48/57 | 31/74 | 28/78 | 33/72 | 17/88 | |
| Multivariate adjusted model | 1 (Reference) | 0.5 (0.3, 0.9) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.8) | 0.6 (0.3, 1.0) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) | |
| Cryptoxanthin (μgram/d) | ≤115.9 | 116.2–197.7 | 199.4–328.0 | 328.2–562.5 | ≥564.6 | 0.67 |
| n of cases/controls | 43/62 | 20/85 | 25/81 | 30/75 | 39/66 | |
| Multivariate adjusted model | 1 (Reference) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.7) | 0.5 (0.2, 0.8) | 0.6 (0.3, 1.0) | 0.9 (0.5 1.6) | |
CI, confidence interval
*Energy adjustment was performed according to the residual model
**Adjusted for smoking history (past and current smokers vs non-smokers), age (years, continuous), sex (male or female), chronic disease history (presence of any of the following: hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, stroke; yes or no), supplement use (yes or no), and alcohol consumption (yes or no).
Figure 1Flowchart describing both case and control subjects who were included and excluded from the analysis.