Literature DB >> 26846231

Touchscreen assays of learning, response inhibition, and motivation in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Brian D Kangas1, Jack Bergman2, Joseph T Coyle2.   

Abstract

Recent developments in precision gene editing have led to the emergence of the marmoset as an experimental subject of considerable interest and translational value. A better understanding of behavioral phenotypes of the common marmoset will inform the extent to which forthcoming transgenic mutants are cognitively intact. Therefore, additional information regarding their learning, inhibitory control, and motivational abilities is needed. The present studies used touchscreen-based repeated acquisition and discrimination reversal tasks to examine basic dimensions of learning and response inhibition. Marmosets were trained daily to respond to one of the two simultaneously presented novel stimuli. Subjects learned to discriminate the two stimuli (acquisition) and, subsequently, with the contingencies switched (reversal). In addition, progressive ratio performance was used to measure the effort expended to obtain a highly palatable reinforcer varying in magnitude and, thereby, provide an index of relative motivational value. Results indicate that rates of both acquisition and reversal of novel discriminations increased across successive sessions, but that rate of reversal learning remained slower than acquisition learning, i.e., more trials were needed for mastery. A positive correlation was observed between progressive ratio break point and reinforcement magnitude. These results closely replicate previous findings with squirrel monkeys, thus providing evidence of similarity in learning processes across nonhuman primate species. Moreover, these data provide key information about the normative phenotype of wild-type marmosets using three relevant behavioral endpoints.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrimination reversal; Marmoset; Progressive ratio; Repeated acquisition; Touchscreen

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846231      PMCID: PMC4826304          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-0959-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  28 in total

Review 1.  The common marmoset as a novel animal model system for biomedical and neuroscience research applications.

Authors:  Hideyuki Okano; Keigo Hikishima; Atsushi Iriki; Erika Sasaki
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  The marmoset as a model of aging and age-related diseases.

Authors:  Suzette D Tardif; Keith G Mansfield; Rama Ratnam; Corinna N Ross; Toni E Ziegler
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2011

3.  Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Junhee Seok; H Shaw Warren; Alex G Cuenca; Michael N Mindrinos; Henry V Baker; Weihong Xu; Daniel R Richards; Grace P McDonald-Smith; Hong Gao; Laura Hennessy; Celeste C Finnerty; Cecilia M López; Shari Honari; Ernest E Moore; Joseph P Minei; Joseph Cuschieri; Paul E Bankey; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jason Sperry; Avery B Nathens; Timothy R Billiar; Michael A West; Marc G Jeschke; Matthew B Klein; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Bernard H Brownstein; Carol Miller-Graziano; Steve E Calvano; Philip H Mason; J Perren Cobb; Laurence G Rahme; Stephen F Lowry; Ronald V Maier; Lyle L Moldawer; David N Herndon; Ronald W Davis; Wenzhong Xiao; Ronald G Tompkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Performance of the marmoset monkey on computerized tasks of attention and working memory.

Authors:  Simona Spinelli; Luis Pennanen; Andrea C Dettling; Joram Feldon; Guy A Higgins; Christopher R Pryce
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

5.  A novel touch-sensitive apparatus for behavioral studies in unrestrained squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Jack Bergman
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Comparisons of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Anandamide on a Battery of Cognition-Related Behavior in Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Michael Z Leonard; Vidyanand G Shukla; Shakiru O Alapafuja; Spyros P Nikas; Alexandros Makriyannis; Jack Bergman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 7.  Marmoset models commonly used in biomedical research.

Authors:  Keith Mansfield
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 8.  Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control.

Authors:  Andrea Bari; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Developmental and familial predictors of adult cognitive traits in the European starling.

Authors:  Daniel Nettle; Clare P Andrews; Pat Monaghan; Ben O Brilot; Thomas Bedford; Robert Gillespie; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  The common marmoset genome provides insight into primate biology and evolution.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  6 in total

1.  Opportunities and challenges in modeling human brain disorders in transgenic primates.

Authors:  Charles G Jennings; Rogier Landman; Yang Zhou; Jitendra Sharma; Julia Hyman; J Anthony Movshon; Zilong Qiu; Angela C Roberts; Anna Wang Roe; Xiaoqin Wang; Huihui Zhou; Liping Wang; Feng Zhang; Robert Desimone; Guoping Feng
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Touchscreen technology in the study of cognition-related behavior.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Jack Bergman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  Sex differences in cognitive aging: a 4-year longitudinal study in marmosets.

Authors:  Emily S Rothwell; Kathryn P Workman; Dongwei Wang; Agnès Lacreuse
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 4.  Using touchscreen-delivered cognitive assessments to address the principles of the 3Rs in behavioral sciences.

Authors:  Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida; Christopher J Heath; Laura Lopez-Cruz
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 12.625

5.  Translational Assessments of Reward Responsiveness in the Marmoset.

Authors:  Lisa M Wooldridge; Jack Bergman; Diego A Pizzagalli; Brian D Kangas
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.176

6.  Macaque monkeys learn and perform a non-match-to-goal task using an automated home cage training procedure.

Authors:  Stefano Sacchetti; Francesco Ceccarelli; Lorenzo Ferrucci; Danilo Benozzo; Emiliano Brunamonti; Simon Nougaret; Aldo Genovesio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.