Literature DB >> 26845264

Bipolar CHOICE (Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness): a pragmatic 6-month trial of lithium versus quetiapine for bipolar disorder.

Andrew A Nierenberg1, Susan L McElroy, Edward S Friedman, Terence A Ketter, Richard C Shelton, Thilo Deckersbach, Melvin G McInnis, Charles L Bowden, Mauricio Tohen, James H Kocsis, Joseph R Calabrese, Gustavo Kinrys, William V Bobo, Vivek Singh, Masoud Kamali, David Kemp, Benjamin Brody, Noreen A Reilly-Harrington, Louisa G Sylvia, Leah W Shesler, Emily E Bernstein, David Schoenfeld, Dustin J Rabideau, Andrew C Leon, Stephen Faraone, Michael E Thase.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder is among the 10 most disabling medical conditions worldwide. While lithium has been used extensively for bipolar disorder since the 1970s, second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have supplanted lithium since 1998. To date, no randomized comparative-effectiveness study has compared lithium and any SGA.
METHOD: Within the duration of the study (September 2010-September 2013), participants with bipolar I or II disorder (DSM-IV-TR) were randomized for 6 months to receive lithium (n = 240) or quetiapine (n = 242). Lithium and quetiapine were combined with other medications for bipolar disorder consistent with typical clinical practice (adjunctive personalized treatment [APT], excluding any SGA for the lithium + APT group and excluding lithium or any other SGA for the quetiapine + APT group). Coprimary outcome measures included Clinical Global Impressions-Efficacy Index (CGI-EI) and necessary clinical adjustments, which measured number of changes in adjunctive personalized treatment. Secondary measures included a full range of symptoms, cardiovascular risk, functioning, quality of life, suicidal ideation and behavior, and adverse events.
RESULTS: Participants improved across all measures, and over 20% had a sustained response. Primary (CGI-EI, P = .59; necessary clinical adjustments, P = .15) and secondary outcome changes were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. For participants with greater manic/hypomanic symptoms, CGI-EI changes were significantly more favorable with quetiapine + APT (P = .02). Among those with anxiety, the lithium + APT group had fewer necessary clinical adjustments per month (P = .02). Lithium was better tolerated than quetiapine in terms of the burden of side effects frequency (P = .05), intensity (P = .01), and impairment (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite adequate power to detect clinically meaningful differences, we found outcomes with lithium + APT and quetiapine + APT were not significantly different across 6 months of treatment for bipolar disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier for the Bipolar CHOICE study: NCT01331304. © Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26845264     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.14m09349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  13 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in a Lifetime Perspective: Is Lithium Still the Best Choice?

Authors:  Gabriele Sani; Giulio Perugi; Leonardo Tondo
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Complex polypharmacy in bipolar disorder: Side effect burden, adherence, and response predictors.

Authors:  Vicki C Fung; Lindsay N Overhage; Louisa G Sylvia; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Masoud Kamali; Keming Gao; Richard C Shelton; Terence A Ketter; William V Bobo; Michael E Thase; Joseph R Calabrese; Mauricio Tohen; Thilo Deckersbach; Andrew A Nierenberg
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Staging in bipolar disorder: from theoretical framework to clinical utility.

Authors:  Michael Berk; Robert Post; Aswin Ratheesh; Emma Gliddon; Ajeet Singh; Eduard Vieta; Andre F Carvalho; Melanie M Ashton; Lesley Berk; Susan M Cotton; Patrick D McGorry; Brisa S Fernandes; Lakshmi N Yatham; Seetal Dodd
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Lakshmi N Yatham; Sidney H Kennedy; Sagar V Parikh; Ayal Schaffer; David J Bond; Benicio N Frey; Verinder Sharma; Benjamin I Goldstein; Soham Rej; Serge Beaulieu; Martin Alda; Glenda MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Arun Ravindran; Claire O'Donovan; Diane McIntosh; Raymond W Lam; Gustavo Vazquez; Flavio Kapczinski; Roger S McIntyre; Jan Kozicky; Shigenobu Kanba; Beny Lafer; Trisha Suppes; Joseph R Calabrese; Eduard Vieta; Gin Malhi; Robert M Post; Michael Berk
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.744

5.  20-Year Trends in the Pharmacologic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder by Psychiatrists in Outpatient Care Settings.

Authors:  Taeho Greg Rhee; Mark Olfson; Andrew A Nierenberg; Samuel T Wilkinson
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Obesity, but not metabolic syndrome, negatively affects outcome in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  S L McElroy; D E Kemp; E S Friedman; N A Reilly-Harrington; L G Sylvia; J R Calabrese; D J Rabideau; T A Ketter; M E Thase; V Singh; M Tohen; C L Bowden; E E Bernstein; B D Brody; T Deckersbach; J H Kocsis; G Kinrys; W V Bobo; M Kamali; M G McInnis; A C Leon; S Faraone; A A Nierenberg; R C Shelton
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 6.392

7.  Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Treatment (SMART) for Bipolar Disorder at Any Phase of Illness and at least Mild Symptom Severity.

Authors:  Keming Gao; Jodi G Arnold; Thomas J Prihoda; Marlon Quinones; Vivek Singh; Martha Schinagle; Carla Conroy; Nicole D'Arcangelo; Yuanhan Bai; Joseph R Calabrese; Charles L Bowden
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2020-05-19

8.  Illness stage and predominant polarity in bipolar disorder: Correlation with burden of illness and moderation of treatment outcome.

Authors:  Masoud Kamali; Samantha Pegg; Jessica A Janos; William V Bobo; Benjamin Brody; Keming Gao; Terence A Ketter; Susan L McElroy; Melvin G McInnis; Dustin J Rabideau; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Richard C Shelton; Louisa G Sylvia; Mauricio Tohen; Andrew Nierenberg
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Adjunctive dietary intervention for bipolar disorder: a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, modified double-blinded trial of a high n-3 plus low n-6 diet.

Authors:  Erika F H Saunders; Dahlia Mukherjee; Tiffany Myers; Emily Wasserman; Ahmad Hameed; Venkatesh Bassappa Krishnamurthy; Beth MacIntosh; Anthony Domenichiello; Christopher E Ramsden; Ming Wang
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 5.345

Review 10.  Consensus on nomenclature for clinical staging models in bipolar disorder: A narrative review from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Staging Task Force.

Authors:  Ralph Kupka; Anne Duffy; Jan Scott; Jorge Almeida; Vicent Balanzá-Martínez; Boris Birmaher; David J Bond; Elisa Brietzke; Ines Chendo; Benicio N Frey; Iria Grande; Danella Hafeman; Tomas Hajek; Manon Hillegers; Marcia Kauer-Sant'Anna; Rodrigo B Mansur; Afra van der Markt; Robert Post; Mauricio Tohen; Hailey Tremain; Gustavo Vazquez; Eduard Vieta; Lakshmi N Yatham; Michael Berk; Martin Alda; Flávio Kapczinski
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 5.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.