Taeho Greg Rhee1, Mark Olfson1, Andrew A Nierenberg1, Samuel T Wilkinson1. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington (Rhee); Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. (Rhee, Wilkinson); Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York (Olfson); and Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston (Nierenberg).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological options for treating bipolar disorder have increased over the past 20 years, with several second-generation antipsychotics receiving regulatory approval in the 1990s. The authors describe trends in use of pharmacological agents in the outpatient management of bipolar disorder. METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the 1997-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, the authors examined trends in the use of mood stabilizers, first- and second-generation antipsychotics, and antidepressants among psychiatrist visits for which bipolar disorder was listed among the primary diagnoses. A logistic regression model was used to identify statistically significant trends, with covariates including age, gender, race/ethnicity, and primary insurance. RESULTS: Antipsychotics were increasingly more commonly prescribed, increasing from 12.4% of outpatient visits for bipolar disorder in the 1997-2000 period to 51.4% in the 2013-2016 period (adjusted odds ratio=5.05, 95% CI=3.65-7.01). Use of mood stabilizers decreased from 62.3% of visits for bipolar disorder in the 1997-2000 period to 26.4% in the 2013-2016 period (adjusted odds ratio=0.18, 95% CI=0.13-0.27). Prescription of antidepressants occurred in 47.0% of visits for bipolar disorder in the 1997-2000 period and 57.5% in the 2013-2016 period. Prescription of an antidepressant without a mood stabilizer increased substantially, from 17.9% in the 1997-2000 period to 40.9% in the 2013-2016 period (adjusted odds ratio=2.88, 95% CI=2.06-4.03). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial changes have occurred in the treatment of bipolar disorder over the past 20 years, with second-generation antipsychotics in large measure supplanting traditional mood stabilizers. Antidepressant prescriptions persisted despite a lack of evidence for their efficacy in bipolar disorder and concerns about increasing the risk of mania. Research is needed to compare the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of newer antipsychotics with those of traditional mood stabilizers.
OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological options for treating bipolar disorder have increased over the past 20 years, with several second-generation antipsychotics receiving regulatory approval in the 1990s. The authors describe trends in use of pharmacological agents in the outpatient management of bipolar disorder. METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the 1997-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, the authors examined trends in the use of mood stabilizers, first- and second-generation antipsychotics, and antidepressants among psychiatrist visits for which bipolar disorder was listed among the primary diagnoses. A logistic regression model was used to identify statistically significant trends, with covariates including age, gender, race/ethnicity, and primary insurance. RESULTS: Antipsychotics were increasingly more commonly prescribed, increasing from 12.4% of outpatient visits for bipolar disorder in the 1997-2000 period to 51.4% in the 2013-2016 period (adjusted odds ratio=5.05, 95% CI=3.65-7.01). Use of mood stabilizers decreased from 62.3% of visits for bipolar disorder in the 1997-2000 period to 26.4% in the 2013-2016 period (adjusted odds ratio=0.18, 95% CI=0.13-0.27). Prescription of antidepressants occurred in 47.0% of visits for bipolar disorder in the 1997-2000 period and 57.5% in the 2013-2016 period. Prescription of an antidepressant without a mood stabilizer increased substantially, from 17.9% in the 1997-2000 period to 40.9% in the 2013-2016 period (adjusted odds ratio=2.88, 95% CI=2.06-4.03). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial changes have occurred in the treatment of bipolar disorder over the past 20 years, with second-generation antipsychotics in large measure supplanting traditional mood stabilizers. Antidepressant prescriptions persisted despite a lack of evidence for their efficacy in bipolar disorder and concerns about increasing the risk of mania. Research is needed to compare the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of newer antipsychotics with those of traditional mood stabilizers.
Authors: Elena Toffol; Taina Hätönen; Antti Tanskanen; Jouko Lönnqvist; Kristian Wahlbeck; Grigori Joffe; Jari Tiihonen; Jari Haukka; Timo Partonen Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Trisha Suppes; Ellen B Dennehy; Robert M A Hirschfeld; Lori L Altshuler; Charles L Bowden; Joseph R Calabrese; M Lynn Crismon; Terence A Ketter; Gary S Sachs; Alan C Swann Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Jie Song; Arvid Sjölander; Erik Joas; Sarah E Bergen; Bo Runeson; Henrik Larsson; Mikael Landén; Paul Lichtenstein Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Kathleen R Merikangas; Hagop S Akiskal; Jules Angst; Paul E Greenberg; Robert M A Hirschfeld; Maria Petukhova; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2007-05
Authors: Jin Hong Park; Nicolas A Nuñez; Manuel Gardea-Resendez; Danielle J Gerberi; Scott Breitinger; Marin Veldic; Mark A Frye; Balwinder Singh Journal: Psychopharmacol Bull Date: 2022-05-31
Authors: Roger S McIntyre; Martin Alda; Ross J Baldessarini; Michael Bauer; Michael Berk; Christoph U Correll; Andrea Fagiolini; Kostas Fountoulakis; Mark A Frye; Heinz Grunze; Lars V Kessing; David J Miklowitz; Gordon Parker; Robert M Post; Alan C Swann; Trisha Suppes; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Mario Maj Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Vanessa W S Ng; Kenneth K C Man; Le Gao; Esther W Chan; Edwin H M Lee; Joseph F Hayes; Ian C K Wong Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 2.732