Literature DB >> 26843682

The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Funding for Newborn Screening Services.

Julia F Costich1, Andrea L Durst2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Affordable Care Act requires most health plans to cover the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel of newborn screening (NBS) tests with no cost sharing. However, state NBS programs vary widely in both the number of mandated tests and their funding mechanisms, including a combination of state laboratory fees, third-party billing, and other federal and state funding. We assessed the potential impact of the Affordable Care Act coverage mandate on states' NBS funding.
METHOD: We performed an extensive review of the refereed literature, federal and state agency reports, relevant organizations' websites, and applicable state laws and regulations; interviewed 28 state and federal officials from August to December 2014; and then assessed the interview findings manually.
RESULTS: Although a majority of states had well-established systems for including laboratory-based NBS tests in bundled charges for newborn care, billing practices for critical congenital heart disease and newborn hearing tests were less uniform. Most commonly, birthing facilities either prepaid the costs of laboratory-based tests when acquiring the filter paper kits, or the facilities paid for the tests when the kits were submitted. Some states had separate arrangements for billing Medicaid, and smaller facilities sometimes contracted with hearing test vendors that billed families separately.
CONCLUSION: Although the Affordable Care Act coverage mandate may offset some state NBS funding for the screenings themselves, federal support is still required to assure access to the full range of NBS program services. Limiting reimbursement to the costs of screening tests alone would undermine the common practice of using screening charges to fund follow-up services counseling, and medical food or formula, particularly for low-income families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26843682      PMCID: PMC4716484          DOI: 10.1177/003335491613100123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  15 in total

Review 1.  U.S. newborn screening policy dilemmas for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  B L Therrell
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.797

2.  Financing state newborn screening programs: sources and uses of funds.

Authors:  Kay Johnson; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Marie Y Mann; Lauren Raskin Ramos; Bradford L Therrell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Financing newborn screening: sources, issues, and future considerations.

Authors:  Bradford L Therrell; Donna Williams; Kay Johnson; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Marie Y Mann; Lauren Raskin Ramos
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

4.  A public health economic assessment of hospitals' cost to screen newborns for critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Scott D Grosse; Jill Glidewell; Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Leslie M Beres; Cynthia F Hinton; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Medicaid covered births, 2008 through 2010, in the context of the implementation of health reform.

Authors:  Anne Rossier Markus; Ellie Andres; Kristina D West; Nicole Garro; Cynthia Pellegrini
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

6.  Medicine. Newborn screening: gaps in the evidence.

Authors:  Bridget Wilcken
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Ethics, evidence, and cost in newborn screening.

Authors:  Mary Ann Baily; Thomas H Murray
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Comprehensive cost-utility analysis of newborn screening strategies.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions.

Authors:  Aimee M Grace; Kathleen G Noonan; Tina L Cheng; Dorothy Miller; Brittany Verga; David Rubin; Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inequities in newborn screening: Race and the role of medicaid.

Authors:  Heeju Sohn; Stefan Timmermans
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2019-10-07

2.  Simple Test, Complex System: Multifaceted Views of Newborn Screening Science, Technology, and Policy.

Authors:  Kee Chan; Michael Petros
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2019-12-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.