Literature DB >> 26842897

[Patients with ICD-10 disorders F3 and F4 in psychiatric and psychosomatic in-patient units - who is treated where? : Allocation features from the PfAD study].

D Bichescu-Burian1, C Cerisier2, A Czekaj2, J Grempler2, S Hund2, S Jaeger2, P Schmid2, G Weithmann2, T Steinert2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Germany, in-patient treatment of patients with depressive, neurotic, anxiety, and somatoform disorders (ICD-10 F3, F4) is carried out in different settings in psychiatry and psychosomatics. Which patient characteristics determine referral to one or the other specialty is a crucial question in mental health policy and is a matter of ongoing controversy. However, comparative data on patient populations are widely lacking.
METHODS: In the study of Treatment Pathways of Patients with Anxiety and Depression (PfAD study), a total of 320 patients with ICD-10 F3/F4 clinical diagnoses were consecutively recruited from four treatment settings (psychiatric depression ward, psychiatric crisis intervention ward, psychiatric day hospitals, or psychosomatic hospital units; 80 participants per setting) and investigated.
RESULTS: In all treatment settings, patients with considerable severity of illness and chronicity were treated. Female gender, higher education, and higher income predicted referral to psychosomatic units; male gender, transfer from another hospital or emergency hospitalization, co-morbidity with a personality disorder, higher general psychiatric co-morbidity, and danger to self at admission predicted referral to psychiatric unit. Patients in psychosomatic units had neither more psychosomatic disorders nor more somatic problems. DISCUSSION: There is considerable overlap between the clientele of psychiatric and psychosomatic units. Referral and allocation appears to be determined by aspects of severity and social status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Depression; Psychiatry; Psychosomatics; Referral

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26842897     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-015-0058-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  17 in total

1.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Mental health care in Germany: current state and trends.

Authors:  Hans Joachim Salize; Wulf Rössler; Thomas Becker
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  [Effectiveness of psychotherapeutic hospital treatment in German speaking countries: a meta-analysis].

Authors:  Sarah Liebherz; Sven Rabung
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol       Date:  2013-07-04

4.  [Differential indication of inpatient and day clinic treatment in psychosomatics].

Authors:  Almut Zeeck; Armin Hartmann; Joachim Küchenhoff; Heinz Weiss; Isa Sammet; Ekkehard Gaus; Eckart Semm; Dirk Harms; Andrea Eisenberg; Roland Rahm; Jörn von Wietersheim
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol       Date:  2008-09-09

5.  [The effectiveness of psychosomatic inpatient treatment - results of a multicenter follow-up study].

Authors:  Thomas Probst; Friedrich von Heymann; Michael Zaudig; Jürgen Konermann; Claas Lahmann; Thomas Loew; Karin Tritt
Journal:  Z Psychosom Med Psychother       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 0.791

6.  [Conditions and strategies for the development of guidelines for the rehabilitation of patients with psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders].

Authors:  U Koch; H Schulz
Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.113

Review 7.  Psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine in Germany: lessons to be learned?

Authors:  Albert Diefenbacher
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.744

Review 8.  Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.

Authors:  M Marshall; R Crowther; A Almaraz-Serrano; F Creed; W Sledge; H Kluiter; C Roberts; E Hill; D Wiersma; G R Bond; P Huxley; P Tyrer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  An intensive treatment program of interpersonal psychotherapy plus pharmacotherapy for depressed inpatients: acute and long-term results.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schramm; Dietrich van Calker; Petra Dykierek; Klaus Lieb; Sabine Kech; Ingo Zobel; Rainer Leonhart; Mathias Berger
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 10.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.

Authors:  D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  3 in total

1.  One-year follow-up of functional impairment in inpatients with mood and anxiety disorders - Potentials of the Mini-ICF-APP.

Authors:  Susanne Jaeger; Carmen Uhlmann; Dana Bichescu-Burian; Erich Flammer; Tilman Steinert; Petra Schmid
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 4.144

2.  [Clinical courses of depressive and anxiety disorders over 1 year : Direct comparison of four treatment settings in psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine-results of the PfAD study].

Authors:  Carmen Uhlmann; Susanne Jaeger; Tilman Steinert; Petra Schmid
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Returning to work after sickness absence due to common mental disorders: study design and baseline findings from an 18 months mixed methods follow-up study in Germany.

Authors:  Alexandra Sikora; Gundolf Schneider; Ralf Stegmann; Uta Wegewitz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.