Literature DB >> 20229487

[The effectiveness of psychosomatic inpatient treatment - results of a multicenter follow-up study].

Thomas Probst1, Friedrich von Heymann, Michael Zaudig, Jürgen Konermann, Claas Lahmann, Thomas Loew, Karin Tritt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter follow-up study examines the effectiveness of psychosomatic inpatient treatment under the conditions of routine practice.
METHODS: We chose a naturalistic design with one pre- and two postmeasurements: admission, discharge, and 1-year follow-up with a follow-up sample of 935 patients from five psychosomatic hospitals.We assessed the effectiveness of inpatient psychosomatic treatments with the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the SCL-90-R at admission (M = 1.20, SD = 0.68), discharge (M = 0.67, SD = 0.58), and 1-year follow-up (M = 0.83, SD = 0.68) as well as with the Veränderungsfragebogen des Erlebens und Verhaltens (VEV-K) at discharge (M = 125.42, SD = 27.27) and follow-up (M = 115.50, SD = 31.16).
RESULTS: Significant improvements were shown in the GSI from admission to discharge (F = 802.70, df = 1, p <or= 0.001) and from admission to follow-up (F = 312.84, df = 1, p < or = 0.001) as well as in the VEV-K at discharge (T = 25.78, df = 764, p < or = 0.001) and at follow-up (T = 15.05, df = 914, p < or = 0.001), showing the effectiveness of psychosomatic inpatient treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20229487     DOI: 10.13109/zptm.2009.55.4.409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Psychosom Med Psychother        ISSN: 1438-3608            Impact factor:   0.791


  8 in total

1.  Functional Somatic Symptoms.

Authors:  Casper Roenneberg; Heribert Sattel; Rainer Schaefert; Peter Henningsen; Constanze Hausteiner-Wiehle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  [Bio-psycho-socio or psychotherapeutic medicine - actual development of psychosomatics in clinical practice].

Authors:  Hans-Christian Deter
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  [Patients with ICD-10 disorders F3 and F4 in psychiatric and psychosomatic in-patient units - who is treated where? : Allocation features from the PfAD study].

Authors:  D Bichescu-Burian; C Cerisier; A Czekaj; J Grempler; S Hund; S Jaeger; P Schmid; G Weithmann; T Steinert
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Do patients' symptoms and interpersonal problems improve in psychotherapeutic hospital treatment in Germany? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Liebherz; Sven Rabung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  History, aims and present structure of psychosomatic medicine in Germany.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Deter; Johannes Kruse; Stephan Zipfel
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2018-01-02

6.  Effectiveness of Inpatient Psychotherapy for Patients With and Without Migratory Background: Do They Benefit Equally?

Authors:  Friederike Kobel; Eva Morawa; Yesim Erim
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  [Clinical courses of depressive and anxiety disorders over 1 year : Direct comparison of four treatment settings in psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine-results of the PfAD study].

Authors:  Carmen Uhlmann; Susanne Jaeger; Tilman Steinert; Petra Schmid
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  The INDDEP study: inpatient and day hospital treatment for depression - symptom course and predictors of change.

Authors:  Almut Zeeck; Joern von Wietersheim; Heinz Weiss; Manfred Beutel; Armin Hartmann
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.630

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.