Literature DB >> 26842409

Management and Outcome of Dens Fracture Nonunions in Geriatric Patients.

Julian Joestl1, Nikolaus W Lang2, Thomas M Tiefenboeck2, Stefan Hajdu2, Patrick Platzer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dens fractures are known to have high rates of pseudarthrosis. The aim of this study was to define clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes, specifically in relation to osseous union, cervical spine movement, neurological sequelae, and quality of life, in a geriatric cohort (sixty-five years of age or older) treated operatively or nonoperatively for a dens fracture nonunion.
METHODS: Forty-four patients (twenty-eight women and sixteen men; average age, seventy-two years) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study. Sixteen patients (36%) underwent operative stabilization with posterior cervical arthrodesis, and twenty-eight (64%) were treated nonoperatively with a predefined protocol. All patients had a post-treatment follow-up period of at least five years.
RESULTS: Radiographic evaluation showed osseous union at the site of the C1-C2 arthrodesis in all sixteen patients who had undergone surgical treatment. Clinical follow-up revealed that fourteen had satisfactory results following postoperative rehabilitation. In contrast, radiographic evaluation of the twenty-eight nonoperatively treated patients showed persistence of the pseudarthrosis of the dens in twenty-six and osseous union of the dens in two. All twenty-eight patients (100%) had a satisfactory clinical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: C1-C2 arthrodesis was a reliable treatment option for dens fracture nonunions that were unstable, those associated with neurological symptoms, and those causing persistent pain. Clinical and radiographic monitoring was an acceptable nonoperative treatment option but was associated with a very low rate of osseous union of the dens.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26842409     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  Type II odontoid fracture in elderly patients treated conservatively: is fracture healing the goal?

Authors:  Giorgio Lofrese; Antonio Musio; Federico De Iure; Francesco Cultrera; Antonio Martucci; Corrado Iaccarino; Walid Ibn Essayed; Reza Ghadirpour; Franco Servadei; Michele Alessandro Cavallo; Pasquale De Bonis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anterior endoscopically assisted bone grafting for iatrogenic distraction of odontoid fracture after percutaneous anterior screw fixation: A case report.

Authors:  Ze-Xin Chen; Hui Zhang; Nai-Feng Tian; Xiang-Yang Wang; Yan Lin; Yao-Sen Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Odontoid Fracture in a Patient With Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis.

Authors:  Adan Omar; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2016-12-27

4.  Reevaluation of a classification system: stable and unstable odontoid fractures in geriatric patients-a radiological outcome measurement.

Authors:  Amelie Deluca; Florian Wichlas; Christian Deininger; Andreas Traweger; Ernst J Mueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Odontoid Type II fractures in elderly: what are the real management goals and how to best achieve them? A multicenter European study on functional outcome.

Authors:  Salvatore Chibbaro; Charles-Henry Mallereau; Mario Ganau; Ismail Zaed; Maria Teresa Bozzi; Antonino Scibilia; Helene Cebula; Irene Ollivier; Marie-Pierre Loit; Dominique Chaussemy; Hugo-Andres Coca; Guillaume Dannhoff; Antonio Romano; Beniamino Nannavecchia; Arthur Gubian; Giorgio Spatola; Francesco Signorelli; Corrado Iaccarino; Raoul Pop; François Proust; Seyyid Baloglu; Julien Todeschi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Odontoid fractures: impact of age and comorbidities on surgical decision making.

Authors:  Syed Ali Mujtaba Rizvi; Eirik Helseth; Pål Rønning; Jalal Mirzamohammadi; Marianne Efskind Harr; Tor Brommeland; Mads Aarhus; Christina Teisner Høstmælingen; Håvard Ølstørn; Pål Nicolay Fougner Rydning; Magnus Mejlænder-Evjensvold; Nils Christian Utheim; Hege Linnerud
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.