Literature DB >> 26841238

Megavoltage quality control, resources and demand: a pragmatic review.

John A Mills1, Steven J Colligan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Satisfactory radiotherapy treatment requires quality control (QC) of the equipment as well as patient-specific checks. Increased complexity and extended use of equipment plus greater demand for complex treatment has brought pressure on QC resources. The benefits of integrating patient-specific checks and QC and the efficient use of resources is examined.
METHODS: A non-linear model for the probability of undetected machine failure is proposed which enables the comparative efficiency of resource to be assessed. Benefits of adopting an integrated view of patient-specific and treatment machine QC is considered, considering performance tolerance levels in the context of measurement uncertainty and patient-specific tolerances.
RESULTS: Essential, machine-only QC is identified. A realistic approach to equipment-only QC is identified for 70% efficient use of resources and a relationship established to determine resource required for a QC programme. Integration of patient-specific and equipment QC is shown to half the resource required for equipment QC.
CONCLUSION: Increasing benefit from QC requires greater resource, working at lower efficiency. A pragmatic approach is having guaranteed checks supplemented with additional, non-guaranteed checks performed within an integrated approach to machine- and patient-specific QC, bearing in mind the occasions when machine-only QC is essential. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The work reveals on a quantitative basis a rational approach to accommodating the QC requirements for safe and effective treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26841238      PMCID: PMC4986490          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

Review 1.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; James M Galvin; Daniel Low; Jatinder R Palta; Isaac Rosen; Michael B Sharpe; Ping Xia; Ying Xiao; Lei Xing; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Time management in radiation oncology: evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the DEGRO-QUIRO trial.

Authors:  L Keilholz; J Willner; H-J Thiel; N Zamboglou; H Sack; W Popp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Radiotherapy staffing in the European countries: final results from the ESTRO-HERO survey.

Authors:  Yolande Lievens; Noémie Defourny; Mary Coffey; Josep M Borras; Peter Dunscombe; Ben Slotman; Julian Malicki; Marta Bogusz; Chiara Gasparotto; Cai Grau; Arianit Kokobobo; Felix Sedlmayer; Elena Slobina; Philippe Coucke; Roumen Gabrovski; Milan Vosmik; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Jana Jaal; Catherine Dejean; Csaba Polgar; Jakob Johannsson; Moya Cunningham; Vydmantas Atkocius; Carlo Back; Martin Pirotta; Vanja Karadjinovic; Sverre Levernes; Boguslaw Maciejewski; Maria Lurdes Trigo; Barbara Šegedin; Amalia Palacios; Bert Pastoors; Charlotte Beardmore; Sara Erridge; Gaile Smyth; Ramon Cleries Soler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; L Coia; M Gillin; W F Hanson; S Leibel; R J Morton; J R Palta; J A Purdy; L E Reinstein; G K Svensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  When and how can we improve precision in radiotherapy?

Authors:  A Dutreix
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  A philosophical approach to treatment machine maintenance and breakdown.

Authors:  S J Colligan; J A Mills
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  The sensitivity of gamma-index method to the positioning errors of high-definition MLC in patient-specific VMAT QA for SBRT.

Authors:  Jung-In Kim; So-Yeon Park; Hak Jae Kim; Jin Ho Kim; Sung-Joon Ye; Jong Min Park
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.