Literature DB >> 26840612

Complexity matching effects in bimanual and interpersonal syncopated finger tapping.

Charles A Coey1, Auriel Washburn2, Justin Hassebrock3, Michael J Richardson4.   

Abstract

The current study was designed to investigate complexity matching during syncopated behavioral coordination. Participants either tapped in (bimanual) syncopation using their two hands, or tapped in (interpersonal) syncopation with a partner, with each participant using one of their hands. The time series of inter-tap intervals (ITI) from each hand were submitted to fractal analysis, as well as to short-term and multi-timescale cross-correlation analyses. The results demonstrated that the fractal scaling of one hand's ITI was strongly correlated to that of the other hand, and this complexity matching effect was stronger in the bimanual condition than in the interpersonal condition. Moreover, the degree of complexity matching was predicted by the strength of short-term cross-correlation and the stability of the asynchrony between the two tapping series. These results suggest that complexity matching is not specific to the inphase synchronization tasks used in past research, but is a general result of coordination between complex systems.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complexity matching; Finger tapping; Fractal scaling; Syncopation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26840612      PMCID: PMC4810785          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  31 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise.

Authors:  D L Gilden
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Fractal ion-channel behavior generates fractal firing patterns in neuronal models.

Authors:  S B Lowen; L S Liebovitch; J A White
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics       Date:  1999-05

3.  Fractal 1/ƒ dynamics suggest entanglement of measurement and human performance.

Authors:  John G Holden; Inhyun Choi; Polemnia G Amazeen; Guy Van Orden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The dynamics of perception and action.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Small-world connectivity, motif composition, and complexity of fractal neuronal connections.

Authors:  Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Predicting the biological variability of environmental rhythms: weak or strong anticipation for sensorimotor synchronization?

Authors:  Kjerstin Torre; Manuel Varlet; Vivien Marmelat
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Origins of timing errors in human sensorimotor coordination.

Authors:  Y Chen; M Ding; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Entrainment to a real time fractal visual stimulus modulates fractal gait dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher K Rhea; Adam W Kiefer; Susan E D'Andrea; William H Warren; Roy K Aaron
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Soft-assembly of sensorimotor function.

Authors:  Christopher T Kello; Guy C Van Orden
Journal:  Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci       Date:  2009-01

10.  The blue-collar brain.

Authors:  Guy Van Orden; Geoff Hollis; Sebastian Wallot
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  9 in total

1.  Exploring complexity matching and asynchrony dynamics in synchronized and syncopated task performances.

Authors:  Charles A Coey; Rachel W Kallen; Anthony Chemero; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Complexity matching and coordination in individual and dyadic performance.

Authors:  Daniel S Schloesser; Christopher T Kello; Vivien Marmelat
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Time-Series Analysis of Embodied Interaction: Movement Variability and Complexity Matching As Dyadic Properties.

Authors:  Leonardo Zapata-Fonseca; Dobromir Dotov; Ruben Fossion; Tom Froese
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-12

Review 4.  Understanding and Modeling Teams As Dynamical Systems.

Authors:  Jamie C Gorman; Terri A Dunbar; David Grimm; Christina L Gipson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-11

5.  Do intentionality constraints shape the relationship between motor variability and performance?

Authors:  Tomás Urbán; Carla Caballero; David Barbado; Francisco J Moreno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fractal fluctuations in exploratory movements predict differences in dynamic touch capabilities between children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and typical development.

Authors:  Bruna S Avelar; Marisa C Mancini; Sergio T Fonseca; Damian G Kelty-Stephen; Débora M de Miranda; Marco Aurélio Romano-Silva; Priscila A de Araújo; Paula L Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn't mean what you think it means.

Authors:  Guilherme Sanches de Oliveira; Maggie Bullock Oliveira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-16

8.  Co-actors Exhibit Similarity in Their Structure of Behavioural Variation That Remains Stable Across Range of Naturalistic Activities.

Authors:  Lillian M Rigoli; Tamara Lorenz; Charles Coey; Rachel Kallen; Scott Jordan; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Modeling Frequency Reduction in Human Groups Performing a Joint Oscillatory Task.

Authors:  Carmela Calabrese; Benoît G Bardy; Pietro De Lellis; Mario di Bernardo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.