Literature DB >> 24212115

Predicting the biological variability of environmental rhythms: weak or strong anticipation for sensorimotor synchronization?

Kjerstin Torre1, Manuel Varlet, Vivien Marmelat.   

Abstract

The internal processes involved in synchronizing our movements with environmental stimuli have traditionally been addressed using regular metronomic sequences. Regarding real-life environments, however, biological rhythms are known to have intrinsic variability, ubiquitously characterized as fractal long-range correlations. In our research we thus investigate to what extent the synchronization processes drawn from regular metronome paradigms can be generalized to other (biologically) variable rhythms. Participants performed synchronized finger tapping under five conditions of long-range and/or short-range correlated, randomly variable, and regular auditory sequences. Combining experimental data analysis and numerical simulation, we found that synchronizing with biologically variable rhythms involves the same internal processes as with other variable rhythms (whether totally random or comprising lawful regularities), but different from those involved with a regular metronome. This challenges both the generalizability of conclusions drawn from regular-metronome paradigms, and recent research assuming that biologically variable rhythms may trigger specific strong anticipatory processes to achieve synchronization.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External rhythms; Fractal; Long-range correlation; Modeling; Regular stimuli; Strong anticipation; Synchronization; Variability; Variable stimuli; Weak anticipation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24212115     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  12 in total

1.  When Coordinating Finger Tapping to a Variable Beat the Variability Scaling Structure of the Movement and the Cortical BOLD Signal are Both Entrained to the Auditory Stimuli.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Michael Hough; Kendra Schmid; Boman R Groff; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  The influence of pacer-movement continuity and pattern matching on auditory-motor synchronisation.

Authors:  Gregory Zelic; Patti Nijhuis; Sarah A Charaf; Peter E Keller; Chris Davis; Jeesun Kim; Manuel Varlet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Harmony from chaos? Perceptual-motor delays enhance behavioral anticipation in social interaction.

Authors:  Auriel Washburn; Rachel W Kallen; Charles A Coey; Kevin Shockley; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of pitch and tempo of auditory rhythms on spontaneous movement entrainment and stabilisation.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Rohan Williams; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-16

5.  Exploring complexity matching and asynchrony dynamics in synchronized and syncopated task performances.

Authors:  Charles A Coey; Rachel W Kallen; Anthony Chemero; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Multifractal signatures of complexity matching.

Authors:  Didier Delignières; Zainy M H Almurad; Clément Roume; Vivien Marmelat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Complexity matching and coordination in individual and dyadic performance.

Authors:  Daniel S Schloesser; Christopher T Kello; Vivien Marmelat
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Single (1:1) vs. double (1:2) metronomes for the spontaneous entrainment and stabilisation of human rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Rohan Williams; Cécile Bouvet; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Complexity matching effects in bimanual and interpersonal syncopated finger tapping.

Authors:  Charles A Coey; Auriel Washburn; Justin Hassebrock; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Postural sway and gaze can track the complex motion of a visual target.

Authors:  Vassilia Hatzitaki; Nicholas Stergiou; George Sofianidis; Anastasia Kyvelidou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.