Literature DB >> 26840024

Role of CD44(high)/CD133(high) HCT-116 cells in the tumorigenesis of colon cancer.

Jin-Yong Zhou1, Min Chen2, Long Ma3, Xiaoxiao Wang4, Yu-Gen Chen5, Shen-Lin Liu6.   

Abstract

This study aimed to explore cell surface biomarkers related to cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their role in the tumorigenesis of colon cancer. Various colon cancer cell lines were screened for CD133 and CD44 expression. CD44(high)/CD133(high) and CD44(low)/CD133(low) cells were separately isolated by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). The cell proliferation, colony formation, cell cycle characteristics, and tumorigenic properties in CD44(high)/CD133(high) and CD44(low)/CD133(low) cells were investigated through in vitro experiments and in vivo tumor xenograft models. The expression profiles of stem cell-related genes were examined by RT-PCR. With HCT-116 cells, flow cytometry analysis revealed that CD44(high)/CD133(high) cells had higher proliferation potency than CD44(low)/CD133(low) cells. Compared to CD44(low)/CD133(low) cells, CD44(high)/CD133(high) cells had more stem cell-related genes, and displayed increased tumorigenic ability. In summary, CD44(high)/CD133(high) cells isolated from HCT-116 cells harbor CSC properties that may be related to the tumor growth of colon cancer. These results suggest that CD44 and CD133 could be strong markers of colorectal cancer stem cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD133; CD44; biomarkers; cancer stem cells (CSCs); colorectal cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26840024      PMCID: PMC4884945          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death in the world [1, 2]. There has been a decline in incidence in the past two decades due to better cancer screening measures [3]. Despite these actions, the morbidity of the disease has not decreased as drastically as those with other types of cancer. This could be changed, however, with the expanding knowledge of the biology of colon cancer cells, particularly with the new subset of cells referred to as cancer stem cells (CSCs). Currently, in addition to surgery, fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with other anti-cancer agents is used as the standard first line chemotherapy based on NCCN guidelines. Because the heterogeneity of colorectal tumors calls for individualized treatments [4, 5], understanding the characteristics of colon CSCs may lead to revolutionary findings in targeted therapeutic strategies. For years, cancer cells were thought to be stochastic in nature and originating from mutations in normal adult cells. However, a sub-population of cells, the CSCs, was found to display stem cell characteristics that influence tumorigenesis. These CSCs have various cancer-promoting characteristics such as self-renewal, differentiation, chemoresistance, and metastatic potential [5-10]. The exact mechanism of tumorigenicity with which CSCs form cancer is unknown, but the complexity of the microenvironment that cells thrive in is gradually being unveiled. Past scientists have viewed stemness of cells as a combination of intrinsic cell properties as well as circumstantial conditions [11, 12]. CD133 is one of the first stemness markers used to identify CSCs [6, 7] and its expression is a strong predictor of declining prognosis, as high CD133 levels conversely relate to low 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) rate in cancer patients [13-15]. Other putative markers include CD44, CD24, LGR5, ALDH, and CD44v6, though not all are definitive markers that differentiate CSCs from normal adult stem cells, and inconsistent level of these markers are presented across varying stages of the tumor [13, 16]. CD133 and CD44 are well-recognized stem cell biomarkers expressed in colorectal cancer [3, 17]. High CD133 expression is especially correlated with tumorigenicity, metastasis, and worse prognosis [17]. It has a strong potential as a target for drug therapies, since many colon cancer cell lines will express this marker [18, 19]. The role of CD44, a hyaluronic receptor, is to promote cell-adhesion and assembly of cell surface growth factors, specifically in the maintenance of cell-matrix interactions [17]. When up-regulated, CD44 increases tumor growth and anti-apoptotic property [19]. In Sahlberg's experiment, three colon cancer cell lines HT-29, HCT-116, and DLD-1 expressed different amounts of CD133, CD44, and other markers. Side population cells extracted from the SW480 cell lines showed protein expression of CD44 and other markers of chemoresistance [17, 20, 21]. Previous reports showed the presence of these biomarkers in many colon cancer cell lines, yet only a few research groups expand their studies to divulge to their exact functions. In this study, we identify that a colon cancer cell line, HCT-116 yield a high percentage of CD44+/CD133+ cells and look further into their relevance to tumor growth property in colon cancer.

RESULTS

Screen for CD44 and CD133 expressed cells in various colorectal cancer cell lines

All cancer cells express varying levels of CD44 and CD133. To delineate CD44 and CD133 expression in colon cancer cells, we used flow cytometry to measure the level of expression of these surface molecules in various colon cancer cell lines. We examined Caco2 cells, HT-29 cells, SW480 cells, SW620 cells, LoVo cells, and HCT-116 cells. The number of cells that expressed the markers in each cell line is visualized in Figure 1. It was found that HCT-116 cells had the highest percentage of CD44high/CD133high cells. HCT-116 cells were used for further study.
Figure 1

Co-expression of CD44 and CD33 in variable colorectal cancer cell lines as determined by flow cytometry

Left column: iso control. Right column: CD44-FITC and CD133-PE staining. (A) Caco2 cells (B) HT-29 cells (C) SW480 cells (D) SW620 cells (E) LoVo cells (F) HCT-116 cells.

Co-expression of CD44 and CD33 in variable colorectal cancer cell lines as determined by flow cytometry

Left column: iso control. Right column: CD44-FITC and CD133-PE staining. (A) Caco2 cells (B) HT-29 cells (C) SW480 cells (D) SW620 cells (E) LoVo cells (F) HCT-116 cells.

Isolation of CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells

As mentioned previously, HCT-116 displayed a high percentage of CD44high/CD133high cells. Therefore, we chose to isolate cells that are CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low. Cells were isolated by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS), followed by serum-free medium (SFM) culture. PI was used as a nuclear staining. Double staining was achieved using CD44-FITC (green color) and CD133-APC (red color). Figure 2 depicts the flow cytometry data following staining and sorting. Sorting the cells successfully resulted in isolation of both CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells (approximately 3–5% of the total cells each).
Figure 2

Flow cytometry sorting of HCT-116 cells

(A) Cells were stained using CD44-FITC, CD133-APC and PI to separate live cells (P2, green) and dead cells (red). (B) Control staining using CD44-FITC and CD133-APC. (C) Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). P3: CD44low/CD133low cells. P4: CD44high/CD133high cells.

Flow cytometry sorting of HCT-116 cells

(A) Cells were stained using CD44-FITC, CD133-APC and PI to separate live cells (P2, green) and dead cells (red). (B) Control staining using CD44-FITC and CD133-APC. (C) Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). P3: CD44low/CD133low cells. P4: CD44high/CD133high cells.

Cell cycle analysis

To evaluate the growth capability of cells, both populations of cells were further examined by using cell cycle analysis to evaluate the number of cells represented in each specific replication phase. Figure 3 shows that less CD44low/CD133low cells were found to be in the G0/G1 phase, indicating lower growth capability than the CD44high/CD133high cells. Both the higher expression of CD44 and CD133 may indicate higher exponential replication, and therefore faster tumor growth.
Figure 3

Cell cycle analysis of CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells in HCT-116 cell line

More cells are in G0/G1 phase in the CD44high/CD133high cell population. (A) CD44low/CD133low cells (B) CD44high/CD133high cells have higher growth capability.

Cell cycle analysis of CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells in HCT-116 cell line

More cells are in G0/G1 phase in the CD44high/CD133high cell population. (A) CD44low/CD133low cells (B) CD44high/CD133high cells have higher growth capability.

Differential expression of stem cell markers in CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells

To understand the difference of expression of cancer stem cell markers in CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells, expressions of various other stem cell markers in addition to CD44 and CD133 were measured in these two cell populations. RNAs were isolated from the two populations of cells. Fluorescent quantitative real-time PCR was performed to investigate the mRNAs of these cells. The results in Figure 4 suggest that genes for stem cell markers CD44, CD133, LGR5, and ALDH1 and ALDH2 are overexpressed in CD44high/CD133high cells, while a gene for differentiated cells CK20 was overexpressed in CD44low/CD133low cells.
Figure 4

The results of real time PCR for various stem cell markers

The relative expression of mRNA for CD44, CD133, ALDH1, ALDH2, Lgr5, c-myc and CK20 in CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells.

The results of real time PCR for various stem cell markers

The relative expression of mRNA for CD44, CD133, ALDH1, ALDH2, Lgr5, c-myc and CK20 in CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells.

Cell proliferation and colony formation properties

One of the characteristics of stem cells is the formation of spheroidal cell mass. To investigate the growing characteristics of CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells, both populations of cells were sorted and cultured in serum-free medium (SFM) in low adhesion 6-well plates. The cells were observed with images captured at different time points (0, 6, 8, 20 days) as shown in Figure 5A. It was found that by Day 6 there was a noticeable difference in colony formation ability and size between the CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells. Irregular formation of the colonies by Day 20 suggests an increase in cell differentiation in the CD44high/CD133high cells. When CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cell populations were seeded on plates coated with low melting point agarose and cultured for 8 days, the formation of colony was much better in the CD44high/CD133high group than in CD44low/CD133low group (Figure 5B).
Figure 5

Formation of stem cell sphere after seeding the sorted CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells

Left: CD44low/CD133low cells. Right: CD44high/CD133high cells (A) Cells cultured in low adhesion 6-well plates. (B) Cells seeded on low melting point agarose coated plates.

Formation of stem cell sphere after seeding the sorted CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells

Left: CD44low/CD133low cells. Right: CD44high/CD133high cells (A) Cells cultured in low adhesion 6-well plates. (B) Cells seeded on low melting point agarose coated plates.

Tumor forming property in vivo

To investigate the tumorigenic properties of CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells, we induced tumor models in mice. Cells were sorted by FACS and injected into the right flank of 6-week-old Balb/c nude mice at two concentrations: 1 × 104 and 1 × 103. After 19 days, animals were sacrificed and the tumors were dissected and weighted. Figure 6 visualizes the various tumor sizes as a result. The concentration of cells injected correlates positively to the percent of tumor formation. When mice were injected with 104 or 103 cells there was a distinction between the CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells in their tumor forming potential. The variation in tumor bulk can be observed as well. Figure 7 shows that in each cell concentration group, the average tumor weight was higher in the CD44high/CD133high groups, and this increase was significant in the 104 cell injection group.
Figure 6

The formation of tumors between CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low HCT-116 cells in mice models

Figure 7

Tumor weights in CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low populations

Mice that did not form a tumor were not included in the statistics. *P < 0.05.

Tumor weights in CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low populations

Mice that did not form a tumor were not included in the statistics. *P < 0.05.

DISCUSSION

The formation of cancer was once thought to be an accumulation of random mutations in normal adult cells. This is quickly being replaced by a new theory on the organized manner of tumor cell proliferation, particularly with the cancer stem cells [3, 5, 10, 16]. CSCs are a subset of cells that can self-regenerate, differentiate, and facilitate tumor proliferation [5–10, 25]. The objectives of the study were to identify the common cell surface biomarkers in colon cancer stem cells and the activities relevant to these markers. In this study, CD133 and CD44 expressed cells were found to be highest in the HCT-116 cells, a metastatic colon cancer cell line [26]. Past studies have found a correlation between the percentage of CD133 positive cells in CSCs and tumor aggressiveness [27-29], cell invasion [30], and poor prognosis [31, 32]. The level of CD44 expression is associated with more cancer metastasis and lower overall patient survival [33]. Therefore, the significant levels of CD133 and CD44 found in HCT-116 cells are concurrent with the aggressive cancer properties such as tumor proliferation and metastasis that these cells display in colon cancer. In a recently published paper [17], high presence of CD44high/CD133high cells were observed in both HT-29 and HCT116 cell lines. We did not find high presence of CD44high/CD133high cells in HT-29 cell line. One possible explanation might be that instead of using single antibody for CD44 and CD133, researchers in this group used two different specific antibodies for each biomarker, so they were able to pick up more CD44high/CD133high cells. Nevertheless, CD133 and CD44 could be strong biomarkers for the identification of CSCs in colon cancer. The cell cycle analysis revealed that cells that expressed CD133 and CD44 were primarily in the G0/G1 phase, indicating that they have higher growing capability than the cells that were CD44low/CD133low. In a study by Kawamoto et al., CD133 cells were found to have faster tumor formation in vitro and in vivo [34]. Other stem cell markers were observed in the CD44high/CD133high cells. CD44high/CD133high cells also showed more overexpression of LGR5 and ALDH2. Previous research showed similar expression levels of these biomarkers in CSCs [18, 35]. These markers are also related to the downstream molecular pathways that carry out tumorigenic activities such as Wnt, Notch, and BMP-1 [18, 36]. In addition, CD47 (the integrin-associated protein) is a “don't eat me” molecule of the cell surface immunoglobulin superfamily that is implicated to enable tumors to escape innate immune system surveillance through the evasion of phagocytosis. There were reports that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) overexpressed CD47. Since HCT116 cells are highly metastatic, it might overexpress CD47 to escape the endogenous “eat me” signals. Future study will be perform to investigate the expression of CD47 in CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells. Differentiation of CSCs is still an area of vast unknown. There are conflicting findings on this matter. Since the initial discovery of CD133 cells, it was found that CSCs could eventually differentiate into a heterogeneous population of tumor cells [3, 6, 7]. However, some researchers have claimed that HCT-116 is a cell line that consists mostly of cells that no longer have the ability to differentiate [25], and that it is a cell line that is vital to tumor aggressiveness and cell invasion [25, 26, 30]. This study's results correspond to those of Xiong et al. which demonstrated that the Side Population (SP) cells of colon cancer can spontaneously differentiate into SP and non-SP cells [20]. The CD44high/CD133high cells that were cultured in serum free medium for 20 days had shifted shapes from spheroid to polygonal. Though the observation is preliminary, it may suggest that CD44high/CD133high cells maintain the ability to differentiate and grow heterogeneous tumors. This finding is further supported by the in vivo tumor formation study in mice. CD44high/CD133high cells had more frequent tumor formation rate in mice. The tumor weight was also higher in CD44high/CD133high cells in every concentration group, significantly so in the 1 × 104 cells group. These results suggest CD44high/CD133high cells have higher tumor forming potential than CD44low/CD133low cells. There are several limitations in this study that could be addressed in future research. Due to small sample size, the results of the study can only support previously reported conclusions in similar experiments. Expanding on the in vivo and in vitro testing of the tumor formation can not only further confirm the distinct tumorigenesis rates between CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells, but may also allow the observation of the timeline of tumor development. Additional studies may be conducted to appreciate the overlapping functions of various CSC biomarkers. We planned to use RNAi technology to down regulate CD133 and CD44 in colon cancer cells to see if it decease the tumorigenic capacity. In addition, we will collect colon cancer patient samples and investigate the expression level of CD133 and CD44. Explore the correlation of expression of CD133/CD44 and the clinicopathological characteristics. As the knowledge of colon cancer biology grows, it also exposes a myriad of new targets for novel oncotherapy. In this study, CD44 and CD133 were shown to have significant potential as two biomarkers for colon cancer stem cells. A better understanding of colon cancer stem cell specific biomarkers allow for selective drug toxicity against tumor cells, earlier detection and treatment of colon cancer, and a proactive approach to preventative care for colon cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of cells

Colon cancer cell lines Caco, HT-29, SW480, SW620, LoVo, and HCT-116 were purchased from Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (Chinese Academy of Sciences, China). To analyze the expression of CD44 and CD133 in different lines, cells were routinely cultured, harvested, trypsin-digested and re-suspended in stain buffer (1 × 106 cells in 80 μl). Cells were then treated with 20 μl FcR Blocking Reagent for 15 min, and incubated with antibodies (human anti-CD44-FITC and human anti-CD133-PE, Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 min. After staining, cells were subjected to flow cytometry for analysis using BD Accuri C6 (CA, USA). To isolate CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low populations in the HCT-116 line, cells were trypsinized and blocked with FcR Blocking Reagent. Propidium iodide staining was applied to exclude the dead cells. Live cells were incubated with antibodies (human anti-CD44-FITC and human anti-CD133-APC, Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, USA) for 30 min. CD44low/CD133low and CD44high/CD133high cells were sorted by a cell sorter (BD FACSARIA III, CA, USA). For cell cycle analysis, CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells were stained with propidium iodide and analyzed using a flow cytometer (BD Calibur, CA, USA) and ModFit software (Verity, Maine, USA).

Assessment of the expression of cancer stem cell markers by RT-PCR

Measurements of different cancer stem cell markers using quantitative RT-PCR are described previously [22-24]. Total RNAs were extracted from isolated CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells using PureLink Kit (Life technologies, MA, USA). RNAs were reversely transcribed to cDNAs (Primescript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser, Takara, China). The primers for human CD44, CD133, ALDH1, ALDH2, Lgr5, c-myc, CK20 and beta-actin (ACTB) were designed using Primer Express and are listed in Table 1. Expressions of target genes were analyzed by ABI 7500 fast real time PCR System and Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Life Technology, MA, USA). The optimized concentrations for real-time PCR were 0.2 μM for both primers in a 10 μl reaction volume. Human ACTB expression was used as an internal control. Each sample was tested in triplicate. The reaction was as follows: 50°C for 20 sec, 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min, then 95°C for 15 sec. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were obtained graphically for the target genes and ACTB. The difference in Ct values between ACTB and target genes were represented as ΔCt values. ΔΔCt values were obtained by subtracting ΔCt values of control samples from those of treated samples. The relative fold change in gene expression was calculated as 2−ΔΔCt.
Table 1

Primers of cancer stem cell markers

GenePrimers sequence 5(5′–3′)Length of PCR product (BP)
ACTB-FGGCCAACCGCGAGAAGAT134
ACTB-RCGTCACCGGAGTCCATCA
CD44-FTGAATATAACCTGCCGCTTTG136
CD44-RGCTTTCTCCATCTGGGCCAT
CD133-FGAGTCGGAAACTGGCAGATAGCA113
CD133-RACGCCTTGTCCTTGGTAGTGTTG
ALDH1-FAGCCTTCACAGGATCAACAGA124
ALDH1-RGTCGGCATCAGCTAACACAA
ALDH2-FACCTGGTGGATTTGGACATGGTCC168
ALDH2-RTCAGGAGCGGGAAATTCCACGGA
Lgr5-FGGTCGCTCTCATCTTGCTCA171
Lgr5-RGCCACAGGGCAGTTTAGGAT
c-myc-FCACCAGCAGCGACTCTGA102
c-myc-RGATCCAGACTCTGACCTTTTGC
CK20-FATGGATTTCAGTCGCAGAAGC170
CK20-RCTCCCATAGTTCACCGTGTGT

Colony formation assay

Assorted CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells were seeded in six-well plates (1 × 104 cells per well) and grown in DMEM/F-12 serum-free medium (Gibco, MA, USA) that contains 20 ng/ml EGF, 10 ng/ml bFGF (Peprotech, NJ, USA), 1% B27, 10 ng/ml LIF (life technology, MA, USA), 5 μg/ml insulin, 1 ng/ml hydrocortisone, and 4 μg/ml heparin sodium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Medium was replenished every 6 days. To evaluate the ability of colony formation for different cells, images were taken at 0, 6, 8, and 20 days after culture using an inverted microscope (CKX41, Olympus, Japan). Assorted CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells were also plated in low melting agarose plates (upper layer 0.6% agarose, bottom layer: 3% agarose). Images were taken under the inverted Olympus microscope at 8 days after plating.

In vivo tumor formation assay

All animal experiments in this study were approved by the IACUC of the affiliated hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Assorted CD44high/CD133high and CD44low/CD133low cells were counted, suspended in PBS, and inoculated subcutaneously (1 × 103 and 1 × 104, cells per mice, 3 × 7 mice per group) into the right flank of 6-week-old Balb/c nude mice (purchased from SLAC Laboratory animal, Shanghai, China). Animals were sacrificed at 19 days after surgery. Tumor sizes and weights were measured for analysis.
  34 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking differentiation: stem cells, regeneration, and plasticity.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Progenitor marker CD133 mRNA is elevated in peripheral blood of cancer patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  Niven Mehra; Maarten Penning; Jolanda Maas; Laurens V Beerepoot; Nancy van Daal; Carla H van Gils; Rachel H Giles; Emile E Voest
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Evolution of the cancer stem cell model.

Authors:  Antonija Kreso; John E Dick
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  In vitro characterization of stem cell-like properties of drug-resistant colon cancer subline.

Authors:  Dong Yang; Haijuan Wang; Jinlong Zhang; Chunxiao Li; Zhong Lu; Jin Liu; Chen Lin; Guixin Li; Haili Qian
Journal:  Oncol Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.574

5.  Common cancer stem cell gene variants predict colon cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Armin Gerger; Wu Zhang; Dongyun Yang; Pierre Bohanes; Yan Ning; Thomas Winder; Melissa J LaBonte; Peter M Wilson; Leonor Benhaim; David Paez; Rita El-Khoueiry; Anthony El-Khoueiry; Michael Kahn; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Characterization of side population cells isolated from the colon cancer cell line SW480.

Authors:  Binghong Xiong; Li Ma; Xiang Hu; Caiquan Zhang; Yong Cheng
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  ABCG2-meditated multidrug resistance and tumor-initiating capacity of side population cells from colon cancer.

Authors:  Zheng-Yuan Xie; Ke Lv; Ying Xiong; Wu-Hua Guo
Journal:  Oncol Res Treat       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.825

8.  Colon cancer stem cells dictate tumor growth and resist cell death by production of interleukin-4.

Authors:  Matilde Todaro; Mileidys Perez Alea; Anna B Di Stefano; Patrizia Cammareri; Louis Vermeulen; Flora Iovino; Claudio Tripodo; Antonio Russo; Gaspare Gulotta; Jan Paul Medema; Giorgio Stassi
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 24.633

9.  Higher percentage of CD133+ cells is associated with poor prognosis in colon carcinoma patients with stage IIIB.

Authors:  Chun-Yan Li; Bao-Xiu Li; Yi Liang; Rui-Qing Peng; Ya Ding; Da-Zhi Xu; Xin Zhang; Zhi-Zhong Pan; De-Sen Wan; Yi-Xin Zeng; Xiao-Feng Zhu; Xiao-Shi Zhang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 10.  CD133 expression and the prognosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shicai Chen; Xinming Song; Zhihui Chen; Xinxin Li; Mingzhe Li; Haiying Liu; Jianchang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Current evidence for vitamin D in intestinal function and disease.

Authors:  Mohammadhossein Hassanshahi; Paul H Anderson; Cyan L Sylvester; Andrea M Stringer
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-07-31

2.  Anti-inflammatory drug resistance selects putative cancer stem cells in a cellular model for genetically predisposed colon cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Telang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Novel markers for circulating tumor stem cells in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Qinghui Meng; Weihua Wu; Tiemin Pei; Long Li; Xiaolong Tang; Haobo Sun
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Simulated microgravity increases polyploid giant cancer cells and nuclear localization of YAP.

Authors:  Raj Pranap Arun; Divya Sivanesan; Bamadeb Patra; Sudha Varadaraj; Rama Shanker Verma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Stem cell models for genetically predisposed colon cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Telang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  A novel tumor suppressor role of myosin light chain kinase splice variants through downregulation of the TEAD4/CD44 axis.

Authors:  Yen-Ju Huang; Tsung-Chun Lee; Yu-Chen Pai; Been-Ren Lin; Jerrold R Turner; Linda Chia-Hui Yu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  A reliable method for the sorting and identification of ALDHhigh cancer stem cells by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Zhengwei Leng; Zhao Yang; Lifa Li; Xiaorong Zhong; He Zhou; Yong Li; Gang Yang; Guangjun Zhang; Yongfu Xiong; Tong Zhou; Jianshui Li; Dongsheng Wang; Jingdong Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Ribonucleic acid interference knockdown of IL-6 enhances the efficacy of cisplatin in laryngeal cancer stem cells by down-regulating the IL-6/STAT3/HIF1 pathway.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Pengruofeng Liu; Xiumei Sun; Shanshan Huang; Fengchan Han; Lili Zhang; Yannan Xu; Tingyan Liu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  Expression of the cancer stem cell markers ABCG2 and OCT-4 in right-sided colon cancer predicts recurrence and poor outcomes.

Authors:  Jun Hu; Jian Li; Xin Yue; Jiacang Wang; Jianzhong Liu; Lin Sun; Dalu Kong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-25

10.  Isolation and Characterization of Chemo-Resistant Stem Cells from a Mouse Model of Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Telang
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.