Literature DB >> 26838839

Fabrication of scalable tissue engineering scaffolds with dual-pore microarchitecture by combining 3D printing and particle leaching.

Soumyaranjan Mohanty1, Kuldeep Sanger1, Arto Heiskanen1, Jon Trifol2, Peter Szabo2, Marin Dufva1, Jenny Emnéus1, Anders Wolff3.   

Abstract

Limitations in controlling scaffold architecture using traditional fabrication techniques are a problem when constructing engineered tissues/organs. Recently, integration of two pore architectures to generate dual-pore scaffolds with tailored physical properties has attracted wide attention in tissue engineering community. Such scaffolds features primary structured pores which can efficiently enhance nutrient/oxygen supply to the surrounding, in combination with secondary random pores, which give high surface area for cell adhesion and proliferation. Here, we present a new technique to fabricate dual-pore scaffolds for various tissue engineering applications where 3D printing of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) mould is combined with salt leaching process. In this technique the sacrificial PVA mould, determining the structured pore architecture, was filled with salt crystals to define the random pore regions of the scaffold. After crosslinking the casted polymer the combined PVA-salt mould was dissolved in water. The technique has advantages over previously reported ones, such as automated assembly of the sacrificial mould, and precise control over pore architecture/dimensions by 3D printing parameters. In this study, polydimethylsiloxane and biodegradable poly(ϵ-caprolactone) were used for fabrication. However, we show that this technique is also suitable for other biocompatible/biodegradable polymers. Various physical and mechanical properties of the dual-pore scaffolds were compared with control scaffolds with either only structured or only random pores, fabricated using previously reported methods. The fabricated dual-pore scaffolds supported high cell density, due to the random pores, in combination with uniform cell distribution throughout the scaffold, and higher cell proliferation and viability due to efficient nutrient/oxygen transport through the structured pores. In conclusion, the described fabrication technique is rapid, inexpensive, scalable, and compatible with different polymers, making it suitable for engineering various large scale organs/tissues.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Dual pores; Random pores; Salt leaching; Scaffolds; Structured pores; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26838839     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  11 in total

1.  Liver Bioengineering: Promise, Pitfalls, and Hurdles to Overcome.

Authors:  Aylin Acun; Ruben Oganesyan; Basak E Uygun
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2019-03-25

2.  Direct Ink Write (DIW) 3D Printed Cellulose Nanocrystal Aerogel Structures.

Authors:  Vincent Chi-Fung Li; Conner K Dunn; Zhe Zhang; Yulin Deng; H Jerry Qi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Differentiation of human-induced pluripotent stem cell under flow conditions to mature hepatocytes for liver tissue engineering.

Authors:  Viktoriia Starokozhko; Mette Hemmingsen; Layla Larsen; Soumyaranjan Mohanty; Marjolijn Merema; Rodrigo C Pimentel; Anders Wolff; Jenny Emnéus; Anders Aspegren; Geny Groothuis; Martin Dufva
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.963

4.  Digital Manufacturing of Selective Porous Barriers in Microchannels Using Multi-Material Stereolithography.

Authors:  Yong Tae Kim; Kurt Castro; Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Inversely 3D-Printed β-TCP Scaffolds for Bone Replacement.

Authors:  Michael Seidenstuecker; Svenja Lange; Steffen Esslinger; Sergio H Latorre; Rumen Krastev; Rainer Gadow; Hermann O Mayr; Anke Bernstein
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Biodegradable Inks in Indirect Three-Dimensional Bioprinting for Tissue Vascularization.

Authors:  Yiting Ze; Yanxi Li; Linyang Huang; Yixin Shi; Peiran Li; Ping Gong; Jie Lin; Yang Yao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-25

7.  Fabrication of fine-pored polydimethylsiloxane using an isopropyl alcohol and water mixture for adjustable mechanical, optical, and thermal properties.

Authors:  Yeunjun Kwak; Yunsung Kang; Wonkeun Park; Eunhwan Jo; Jongbaeg Kim
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Fabrication of polylactic acid (PLA)-based porous scaffold through the combination of traditional bio-fabrication and 3D printing technology for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaqing Zhou; Gan Zhou; Radoslaw Junka; Ningxiao Chang; Aneela Anwar; Haoyu Wang; Xiaojun Yu
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 5.268

9.  Investigating the Role of Surface Materials and Three Dimensional Architecture on In Vitro Differentiation of Porcine Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells.

Authors:  Sofie Bruun Hartmann; Soumyaranjan Mohanty; Kerstin Skovgaard; Louise Brogaard; Frederikke Bjergvang Flagstad; Jenny Emnéus; Anders Wolff; Artur Summerfield; Gregers Jungersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dual Porosity Protein-based Scaffolds with Enhanced Cell Infiltration and Proliferation.

Authors:  Morteza Rasoulianboroujeni; Nasim Kiaie; Fahimeh Sadat Tabatabaei; Amir Yadegari; Farahnaz Fahimipour; Kimia Khoshroo; Lobat Tayebi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.