Literature DB >> 26836975

Toward rapid learning in cancer treatment selection: An analytical engine for practice-based clinical data.

Samuel G Finlayson1, Mia Levy2, Sunil Reddy3, Daniel L Rubin4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Wide-scale adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) has created an unprecedented opportunity for the implementation of Rapid Learning Systems (RLSs) that leverage primary clinical data for real-time decision support. In cancer, where large variations among patient features leave gaps in traditional forms of medical evidence, the potential impact of a RLS is particularly promising. We developed the Melanoma Rapid Learning Utility (MRLU), a component of the RLS, providing an analytical engine and user interface that enables physicians to gain clinical insights by rapidly identifying and analyzing cohorts of patients similar to their own.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new approach for clinical decision support in Melanoma was developed and implemented, in which patient-centered cohorts are generated from practice-based evidence and used to power on-the-fly stratified survival analyses. A database to underlie the system was generated from clinical, pharmaceutical, and molecular data from 237 patients with metastatic melanoma from two academic medical centers. The system was assessed in two ways: (1) ability to rediscover known knowledge and (2) potential clinical utility and usability through a user study of 13 practicing oncologists.
RESULTS: The MRLU enables physician-driven cohort selection and stratified survival analysis. The system successfully identified several known clinical trends in melanoma, including frequency of BRAF mutations, survival rate of patients with BRAF mutant tumors in response to BRAF inhibitor therapy, and sex-based trends in prevalence and survival. Surveyed physician users expressed great interest in using such on-the-fly evidence systems in practice (mean response from relevant survey questions 4.54/5.0), and generally found the MRLU in particular to be both useful (mean score 4.2/5.0) and useable (4.42/5.0). DISCUSSION: The MRLU is an RLS analytical engine and user interface for Melanoma treatment planning that presents design principles useful in building RLSs. Further research is necessary to evaluate when and how to best use this functionality within the EMR clinical workflow for guiding clinical decision making.
CONCLUSION: The MRLU is an important component in building a RLS for data driven precision medicine in Melanoma treatment that could be generalized to other clinical disorders.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interactive data analysis; Learning health system; Melanoma; Precision medicine; Rapid learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26836975      PMCID: PMC4836997          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  33 in total

1.  Surveys identify barriers to participation in clinical trials.

Authors:  R Finn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  A rapid-learning health system.

Authors:  Lynn M Etheredge
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Integration of clinical and genetic data in the i2b2 architecture.

Authors:  Shawn N Murphy; Michael E Mendis; David A Berkowitz; Isaac Kohane; Henry C Chueh
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  The problem of multiple testing.

Authors:  Kristin L Sainani
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  LifeLines: using visualization to enhance navigation and analysis of patient records.

Authors:  C Plaisant; R Mushlin; A Snyder; J Li; D Heller; B Shneiderman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

7.  Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma.

Authors:  John A Curtin; Jane Fridlyand; Toshiro Kageshita; Hetal N Patel; Klaus J Busam; Heinz Kutzner; Kwang-Hyun Cho; Setsuya Aiba; Eva-Bettina Bröcker; Philip E LeBoit; Dan Pinkel; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  An informatics-based chronic disease practice: case study of a 35-year computer-based longitudinal record system.

Authors:  R A Nordyke; C A Kulikowski
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Michael B Atkins; David R Byrd; Antonio C Buzaid; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Shouluan Ding; Alexander M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; John M Kirkwood; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Arthur J Sober; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Translational research platforms integrating clinical and omics data: a review of publicly available solutions.

Authors:  Vincent Canuel; Bastien Rance; Paul Avillach; Patrice Degoulet; Anita Burgun
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 11.622

View more
  7 in total

1.  Factors influencing the use by radiation therapists of cancer symptom guides: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  C Ludwig; J Renaud; L Barbera; M Carley; C Henry; L Jolicoeur; C Kuziemsky; A Patry; D Stacey
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  A scoping review of clinical decision support tools that generate new knowledge to support decision making in real time.

Authors:  Anna Ostropolets; Linying Zhang; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Use of an Artificial Neural Network to Identify Patient Clusters in a Large Cohort of Patients with Melanoma by Simultaneous Analysis of Costs and Clinical Characteristics.

Authors:  Giovanni Damiani; Alessandra Buja; Enzo Grossi; Michele Rivera; Anna De Polo; Giuseppe De Luca; Manuel Zorzi; Antonella Vecchiato; Paolo Del Fiore; Mario Saia; Vincenzo Baldo; Massimo Rugge; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Gianfranco Damiani
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.875

4.  The three numbers you need to know about healthcare: the 60-30-10 Challenge.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Paul Glasziou; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 5.  The Science of Learning Health Systems: Scoping Review of Empirical Research.

Authors:  Louise A Ellis; Mitchell Sarkies; Kate Churruca; Genevieve Dammery; Isabelle Meulenbroeks; Carolynn L Smith; Chiara Pomare; Zeyad Mahmoud; Yvonne Zurynski; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 6.  Identifying requisite learning health system competencies: a scoping review.

Authors:  Paige L McDonald; Jessica Phillips; Kenneth Harwood; Joyce Maring; Philip J van der Wees
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Needs with Regard to Decision Support Systems for Treating Patients with Incurable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Dóra Révész; Ellen G Engelhardt; Johannes J Tamminga; Franz M N H Schramel; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Ewoudt M W van de Garde; Ewout W Steyerberg; Henrica C W de Vet; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.