Philip L Mar1, Victor Nwazue2, Bonnie K Black2, Italo Biaggioni3, André Diedrich4, Sachin Y Paranjape2, James E Loyd2, Anna R Hemnes2, Ivan M Robbins2, David Robertson5, Satish R Raj6, Eric D Austin7. 1. Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. 2. Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. 3. Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. 4. Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. 5. Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. 6. Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Cardiac Science, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Electronic address: eric.austin@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are routinely instructed to avoid performing the Valsalva maneuver for fear of syncope or sudden cardiac death. The mechanism of this action has not been elucidated. We conducted a case-control trial of nine patients with PAH and 15 healthy control subjects to determine if systemic hemodynamic changes during the Valsalva maneuver in these patients invoke greater susceptibility to syncope than healthy control subjects. Metrics commonly employed in autonomic testing were used to assess the degree of autonomic failure. METHODS: Common Valsalva parameters, including adrenergic baroreflex sensitivity, pressure recovery time, systolic BP (SBP) recovery, diastolic BP (DBP) recovery, mean arterial pressure recovery, and the Valsalva ratio, were calculated. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare continuous variables. The primary end point was adrenergic baroreflex sensitivity. RESULTS: Patients with PAH had lower adrenergic baroreflex sensitivity (9.7 ± 4.6 mm Hg/s vs 18.8 ± 9.2 mm Hg/s; P = .005), longer pressure recovery time (3.6 ± 2.5 s vs 1.7 ± 0.8 s; P = .008), similar SBP recovery (-13 ± 11 mm Hg vs -12 ± 23 mm Hg; P = .640), less DBP recovery (-1 ± 12 mm Hg vs 13 ± 14 mmHg; P = .025), less mean arterial pressure recovery (-5 ± 11 mm Hg vs 5 ± 17 mm Hg; P = .048), and a decreased Valsalva ratio (1.25 ± 0.11 vs 1.60 ± 0.22; P < .001) compared with healthy control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with healthy control subjects, patients with PAH are more susceptible to syncope during the Valsalva maneuver because of autonomic dysfunction causing cerebral hypoperfusion. These study patients with PAH exhibited a degree of susceptibility to syncope similar to a spectrum of patients with intermediate autonomic failure who typically experience a SBP drop of 10 to 30 mm Hg with standing.
BACKGROUND:Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are routinely instructed to avoid performing the Valsalva maneuver for fear of syncope or sudden cardiac death. The mechanism of this action has not been elucidated. We conducted a case-control trial of nine patients with PAH and 15 healthy control subjects to determine if systemic hemodynamic changes during the Valsalva maneuver in these patients invoke greater susceptibility to syncope than healthy control subjects. Metrics commonly employed in autonomic testing were used to assess the degree of autonomic failure. METHODS: Common Valsalva parameters, including adrenergic baroreflex sensitivity, pressure recovery time, systolic BP (SBP) recovery, diastolic BP (DBP) recovery, mean arterial pressure recovery, and the Valsalva ratio, were calculated. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare continuous variables. The primary end point was adrenergic baroreflex sensitivity. RESULTS:Patients with PAH had lower adrenergic baroreflex sensitivity (9.7 ± 4.6 mm Hg/s vs 18.8 ± 9.2 mm Hg/s; P = .005), longer pressure recovery time (3.6 ± 2.5 s vs 1.7 ± 0.8 s; P = .008), similar SBP recovery (-13 ± 11 mm Hg vs -12 ± 23 mm Hg; P = .640), less DBP recovery (-1 ± 12 mm Hg vs 13 ± 14 mmHg; P = .025), less mean arterial pressure recovery (-5 ± 11 mm Hg vs 5 ± 17 mm Hg; P = .048), and a decreased Valsalva ratio (1.25 ± 0.11 vs 1.60 ± 0.22; P < .001) compared with healthy control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with healthy control subjects, patients with PAH are more susceptible to syncope during the Valsalva maneuver because of autonomic dysfunction causing cerebral hypoperfusion. These study patients with PAH exhibited a degree of susceptibility to syncope similar to a spectrum of patients with intermediate autonomic failure who typically experience a SBP drop of 10 to 30 mm Hg with standing.
Authors: Agnieszka Ciarka; Vi Doan; Sonia Velez-Roa; Robert Naeije; Philippe van de Borne Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Susanna Mak; Klaus K Witte; Abdul Al-Hesayen; John J Granton; John D Parker Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Marius M Hoeper; Harm Jan Bogaard; Robin Condliffe; Robert Frantz; Dinesh Khanna; Marcin Kurzyna; David Langleben; Alessandra Manes; Toru Satoh; Fernando Torres; Martin R Wilkins; David B Badesch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D J Williamson; L L Wallman; R Jones; A M Keogh; F Scroope; R Penny; C Weber; P S Macdonald Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-07-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C L McGowan; J S Swiston; C F Notarius; S Mak; B L Morris; P E Picton; J T Granton; J S Floras Journal: Heart Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Jenny Z Yang; Mazen F Odish; Hannah Mathers; Nicole Pebley; Gabriel Wardi; Demosthenes G Papamatheakis; David S Poch; Nick H Kim; Timothy M Fernandes; Rebecca E Sell Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.886