Literature DB >> 26834465

The incidence of cervical spondylosis decreases with aging in the elderly, and increases with aging in the young and adult population: a hospital-based clinical analysis.

Chuanling Wang1, Fuming Tian1, Yingjun Zhou2, Wenbo He1, Zhiyou Cai1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Cervical spondylosis is well accepted as a common degenerative change in the cervical spine. Compelling evidence has shown that the incidence of cervical spondylosis increases with age. However, the relationship between age and the incidence of cervical spondylosis remains obscure. It is essential to note the relationship between age and the incidence of cervical spondylosis through more and more clinical data.
METHODS: In the case-controlled study reported here, retrospective clinical analysis of 1,276 cases of cervical spondylosis has been conducted. We analyzed the general clinical data, the relationship between age and the incidence of cervical spondylosis, and the relationship between age-related risk factors and the incidence of cervical spondylosis. A chi-square test was used to analyze the associations between different variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value of less than 0.05.
RESULTS: The imaging examination demonstrated the most prominent characteristic features of cervical spondylosis: bulge or herniation at C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6. The incidence of cervical spondylosis increased with aging before age 50 years and decreased with aging after age 50 years, especially in the elderly after 60 years old. The occurrence rate of bulge or herniation at C3-C4, C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 increased with aging before age 50 years and decreased with aging after age 50 years, especially after 60 years. Moreover, the incidence of hyperosteogeny and spinal stenosis increased with aging before age 60 years and decreased with aging after age 60 years, although there was no obvious change in calcification. The age-related risk factors, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cerebral infarct, cardiovascular diseases, smoking, and drinking, have no relationship with the incidence of cervical spondylosis.
CONCLUSION: A decreasing proportion of cervical spondylosis with aging occurs in the elderly, while the proportion of cervical spondylosis increases with aging in the young and the adults. This investigation implicates that aging is not only a contributor to the clinical performance of cervical spondylosis in the elderly, although the incidence of cervical spondylosis is proportional to the progress of age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; cervical spondylosis; incidence; risk factor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26834465      PMCID: PMC4716725          DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S93118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Interv Aging        ISSN: 1176-9092            Impact factor:   4.458


Introduction

Cervical spondylosis is a chronic degenerative process of the cervical spine that affects the vertebral bodies and intervertebral disks of the neck, and may progress into disk herniation, bone spur formation, compression of the spinal cord, or cervical spondylotic myelopathy.1 Cervical spondylosis often develops at multiple interspaces and worsens with age.2,3 Cervical spondylosis can be identified in the majority of people older than 50 years. There also appears to be a genetic predisposition to develop diseases of the skeletal elements of the spine because some families will have more of these changes.4–6 It can also be shown that the degenerative changes in the cervical spines of twins follow a very similar pattern.6,7 Chronic cervical degeneration is the most common cause of progressive spinal cord and nerve root compression. Spondylotic changes are frequently found in many asymptomatic adults, resulting in stenosis of the spinal canal, lateral recess, and foramina.8,9 Radiculopathy is a result of intervertebral foramina narrowing. Spinal canal stenosis can lead to spinal cord compression, ultimately resulting in cervical spondylosis myelopathy.8 Cervical disk herniation occurs when the nucleus in the center of the disc pushes out of its normal space.10 The nucleus presses against the annulus, causing the disc to bulge outward. Gradually, the nucleus herniates completely through the annulus and crushes the disc, compressing the spinal canal or nerve roots. Additionally, the nucleus releases chemicals that can irritate the surrounding nerves causing inflammation and pain.11,12 Symptoms of cervical spondylosis include one, or a combination, of the following: numbness, weakness and tingling in the neck and/or arms, pain in the neck and/or arms, neck stiffness, headaches, symptomatic compression of the spinal cord (myelopathy) or13 nerve roots (radiculopathy)14 or a combination of the two (myeloradiculopathy), or problems with bladder function from cervical myelopathy.15,16 Cervical spondylosis is a disorder of age-related wear affecting the disks and vertebrae of cervical spine.17 Increasing clinical imaging data evidence that age is a risk factor and a contributor to the incidence of cervical spondylosis that increases with aging.18,19 However, our clinical investigation has recently demonstrated that the trend of the incidence of cervical spondylosis decreases with aging in the elderly and increases with aging in the young and the adults.

Clinical data and methods

The study was conducted at Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine in the Central China. It is a general hospital with over 2,500 outpatient visits daily and 2,800 inpatient beds. Subjects (n=1,276) with cervical spondylosis were included. In this study, all data from January 2013 to December 2014 were collected from the all departments of Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of Hubei University of Medicine. Diagnoses were determined according to 2012 ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Code 721 (721.0 Cervical spondylosis without myelopathy, 721.1 Cervical spondylosis with myelopathy). The comprehensive diagnostic process included medical history, physical examination, and diagnostic tests. All patients with cervical injury, tumor, or infection were excluded from the study. Computed tomography scans and/or magnetic resonance imaging were performed to confirm the diagnosis of cervical spondylosis. The clinical data of all cases were collected, including variables on sociodemographic characteristics, age-related risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cerebral infarct, cardiovascular diseases, smoking, and drinking), and physical examination findings such as body weight, height, hip and waist circumferences, and blood pressure. Retrospective clinical analysis of 1,276 cases of cervical spondylosis has been conducted. The data were edited and entered into a computer to be analyzed using SPSS, Windows version 13.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). A chi-square test was used to analyze the associations between different variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value of less than 0.05.

Results

The general clinical data analysis

The general clinical data demonstrated that the main symptoms and signs of cervical spondylosis involved pain in the back, neck and/or arms, weakness and tingling in the neck and/or arms, dizziness, headache, vertigo and instability while walking, nausea and vomiting, and neck stiffness. The most prevalent symptom was pain in the back, neck, and/or arms (Table 1). The imaging examination with computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging presented the most prominent characteristic features of cervical spondylosis: bulge or herniation at C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6, besides spinal stenosis, vertebral hyperostosis, calcification, and the disappearance of the spine’s physiological curvature (Table 2).
Table 1

Clinical symptoms and signs

Symptoms or signsCasesPercentage
Headache35527.8
Dizziness69654.5
Neck stiffness13912.3
Nausea and vomiting18114.2
Weakness and tingling in the neck and/or arms65551.3
Pain in the back, neck, and/or arms1,10686.7
Vertigo and instability of walking18814.7
Table 2

Imaging features

Imaging featuresCasesPercentage
Bulge or herniation at C2-C3241.9
Bulge or herniation at C3-C474658.5
Bulge or herniation at C4-C579862.5
Bulge or herniation at C5-C674158.1
Bulge or herniation at C6-C731024.3
Bulge or herniation at C7-T1221.7
Hyperosteogeny18914.8
Spinal stenosis776.0
Calcification80.6

The analysis of relationship between age and the incidence of cervical spondylosis

In general, clinical data showed that the proportion of patients with cervical spondylosis increased with aging before age 50 years and decreased with aging after age 50 years, especially in the elderly after 60 years. The same results were found in both the male and the female subjects. There is an obvious decrease in the incidence of the disease in elderly female patients (Figure 1 and Table 3).
Figure 1

Age distribution of patients with cervical spondylosis.

Table 3

Age distribution of patients with cervical spondylosis

SexAge distribution (years)
N
<3030–4041–5051–6061–7071–8081–90>90
Male and female41174419329204753311,276
Male16641581168232201489
Female2511026121312243130787
The imaging findings (Figure 2 and Table 4) are consistent with the previous results that the proportion of cervical spondylosis increased with aging before age 50 years and decreased with aging after age 50 years. The occurrence rate of bulge or herniation at C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6, the most prominent characteristic imaging features, increased with aging before age 50 years and decreased with aging after age 50 years, especially after 60 years. The same finding was observed in the bulge or herniation at C6-C7. In addition, the proportion of hyperosteogeny and spinal stenosis increased with aging before age 60 years and decreased with aging after age 60 years, although there was no obvious change in calcification.
Figure 2

Age distribution of patients with imaging features of cervical spondylosis.

Table 4

Age distribution of patients with imaging features of cervical spondylosis

Imaging featuresAge distribution (years)
N
<3030–4041–5051–6061–7071–8081–90>90
Bulge or herniation at C2-C30388310124
Bulge or herniation at C3-C4159623020113549201746
Bulge or herniation at C4-C51810525422312950191798
Bulge or herniation at C5-C61999238207122401619741
Bulge or herniation at C6-C763398915319101310
Bulge or herniation at C7-T103410310122
Hyperosteogeny4164961401360189
Spinal stenosis362426629177
Calcification110221108

The relationship between risk factors and the incidence of cervical spondylosis

The association between the clinical risk factors and cervical spondylosis is listed in Table 5. It seems that the most related element with cervical spondylosis was hypertension. However, Table 6 showed that the age-related risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cerebral infarct, cardiovascular diseases, smoking, and drinking) have no relationship with the incidence of cervical spondylosis.
Table 5

Clinical risk factors

Risk factorsCasesPercentage
Hypertension20916.4
Diabetes816.3
Cardiovascular diseases1249.7
Cerebral infarct937.3
Smoking1078.4
Drinking917.1
Hyperlipidemia322.5
Table 6

The relationship between risk factors and the incidence of cervical spondylosis

Risk factorsAge distribution (years)
P-value
<3030–4041–5051–6061–7071–8081–90>90
4117441932920475331
Hypertension9 (22.0%)28 (16.1%)64 (15.3%)50 (15.2%)34 (16.7%)12 (16.0%)11 (33.3%)1 (100%)0.106
Diabetes6 (14.6%)18 (10.3%)23 (5.5%)14 (4.3%)11 (5.4%)3 (4.0%)6 (18.2%)0 (0)0.093
Cardiovascular diseases7 (17.1%)22 (12.6%)31 (7.4%)25 (7.6%)29 (14.2%)6 (8.0%)4 (12.1%)0 (0)0.081
Cerebral infarct6 (14.6%)18 (10.3%)15 (3.6%)19 (5.8%)22 (10.8%)10 (13.3%)2 (6.1%)1 (100%)0.126
Smoking4 (9.8%)15 (8.6%)39 (9.3%)33 (10.0%)11 (5.4%)3 (4.0%)2 (6.1%)0 (0)0.327
Drinking5 (12.2%)20 (11.5%)34 (8.1%)16 (4.9%)10 (4.9%)4 (5.3%)2 (6.1%)0 (0)0.107
Hyperlipidemia3 (7.3%)6 (3.4%)6 (1.4%)10 (3.0%)4 (2.0%)1 (1.3%)2 (6.1%)0 (0)0.095

Discussion

The one hospital-based clinical investigation showed that the most prevalence symptom of cervical spondylosis is pain in the back, neck, and/or arms, and the most prominent characteristic feature is the bulge or herniation at C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6. The most age-related risk element with cervical spondylosis was hypertension, and to a lesser extent, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cerebral infarct, cardiovascular diseases, smoking, and drinking. Different from past reports that the incidence of cervical spondylosis increases with aging, the distinctive characteristics of this study have indicated that the incidence of cervical spondylosis increases with aging before age 50 years, and decreases with aging after age 50 years, especially in the elderly after 60 years. Increasing evidence shows that intervertebral disks lose hydration and elasticity with age, gradually resulting in cracks and fissures and causing a loss of their elastic properties for the surrounding ligaments and developing the onset of spurs.20–23 The disk subsequently collapses as a result of biomechanical disability, leading to serious consequences (the annulus to bulge outward). Annulus fissures and herniation can occur directly after the annulus bulges.18,24 Disk herniation may be a very poor source of chronic spondylotic changes on the basis of annulus fissures and herniation.25,26 An increasing clinical and pathological literature supports that cervical spondylotic changes are also a common occurrence with age.19 With the progress of cervical spondylotic changes, symptoms often develop slowly over time, such as headache, neck stiffness, pain in the back, neck and/or arms, weakness and tingling in the neck and/or arms, dizziness, and so on.27–30 Patients with cervical spondylosis usually present with neck pain with or without radiculopathy or myelopathy.26,31 It is well known that the major risk factor is aging. By the age of 60, most persons show signs of cervical spondylosis (according to imaging examination).2,3,19 With the process of aging, discs gradually dry out, lose their strength and resiliency, and easily induce the occurrence of herniation.32,33 Accordingly, the clinical presentation will become more pronounced. However, our clinical investigation has implicated that the incidence of cervical spondylosis decreases with aging in the elderly population, especially after 60 years, although it increases with aging before age 50 years. Further assays subsequently proved that there is no relationship between the incidence of cervical spondylosis in the elderly and the age-related risk factors. Thus, we addressed the pathogenesis of cervical spondylosis and showed that the volume and inflammation of the nucleus gets lesser since chronic degeneration contributes to atrophy of the nucleus with the aging process.34–36 The pressure from the nucleus will become gradually less, resulting in the lower incidence of annulus injury and occurrence of cervical spondylosis, and less clinical manifestations, especially after 60 years of age. Considering that the inflammatory effect of the nucleus is stronger than degeneration in the young and the adults before 50 years, the highest incidence of cervical spondylosis corresponds with this age stage – approximately 50 years. With the process of aging, the inflammatory effect of the nucleus is weaker than the degeneration of the nucleus after 60 years of age, the incidence of cervical spondylosis will decrease with aging. Cervical spondylosis is a common condition that is estimated to account for the degenerative changes in the cervical spine, with approximately 90% of cases occurring in those older than 50 years.37,38 Age may play a dual role in the pathogenesis of cervical spondylosis. In different age stages, cervical spondylosis will have a different clinical feature. In consideration of the previous finding that the incidence of cervical spondylosis increases with aging before age 50 years and decreases with aging after age 50 years, our clinical data indicated that surgery is not the treatment of first choice in elderly patients with cervical spondylosis. If it is not an acute case of nerve and spinal cord compression, nonoperative therapeutic interventions should be designed for the elderly cervical spondylosis patients, such as physical therapy and pain medications. Older cervical spondylosis patients usually have more lesions of cervical disc levels, and then surgery will not benefit to improve functional outcome.39,40 As age progresses, the volume of the nucleus becomes smaller, and the pressure from the nucleus is less. Hence, the mainstay of the treatment for the old adult patients with cervical spondylosis is in a rehabilitation center if they present with degenerative changes and have no acute symptoms and signs. Moreover, this study also provides new consideration for the future treatment of cervical spondylosis, especially in the elderly population.
  40 in total

Review 1.  Imaging the intervertebral disk: age-related changes, herniations, and radicular pain.

Authors:  Filippo Del Grande; Timothy P Maus; John A Carrino
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Effects of intervertebral disk degeneration on the flexibility of the human thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  M A Tyndyk; J P McGarry; V Barron; P E McHugh; D O'Mahoney; W Tawackoli; M A K Liebschner
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2008

Review 3.  Current techniques in the management of cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  Carter S Gerard; John E O'Toole
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes.

Authors:  Hatsuho Mamata; Ferenc A Jolesz; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Prevalence and risk factors for cervical and lumbar spondylosis in interventional electrophysiologists.

Authors:  David Birnie; Jeff S Healey; Andrew D Krahn; Kamran Ahmad; Eugene Crystal; Yaariv Khaykin; Vijay Chauhan; Francois Philippon; Derek Exner; Bernard Thibault; Tomascz Hruczkowski; Pablo Nery; Arieh Keren; Damian Redfearn
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-03-08

6.  Refinement of elastic, poroelastic, and osmotic tissue properties of intervertebral disks to analyze behavior in compression.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Jeffrey P Laible; Mack G Gardner-Morse; John J Costi; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Familial cervical spondylosis. Case report.

Authors:  K Yoo; T C Origitano
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Outcomes from magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed symptomatic cervical disk herniation patients treated with high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy: a prospective cohort study with 3-month follow-up.

Authors:  Cynthia K Peterson; Christof Schmid; Serafin Leemann; Bernard Anklin; B Kim Humphreys
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  The natural history and clinical syndromes of degenerative cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  John C Kelly; Patrick J Groarke; Joseph S Butler; Ashley R Poynton; John M O'Byrne
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-11-28

10.  Psychometric properties of the Polish language version of the chronic pain coping inventory-42 for patients treated surgically due to herniated lumbar discs and spondylotic changes.

Authors:  Ewa Misterska; Roman Jankowski; Maciej Głowacki
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-05-14
View more
  17 in total

1.  No Difference in Functional Outcome but Higher Revision Rate Among Smokers Undergoing Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Analysis of a Spine Registry.

Authors:  Lee Wen-Shen; Maksim Lai Wern Sheng; William Yeo; Tan Seang Beng; Yue Wai Mun; Guo Chang Ming; Mohammad Mashfiqul Arafin Siddiqui
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

2.  Correlation between the severity of myelopathy and cervical morphometric parameters on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tomasz Tykocki; Johannes du Plessis; Guy Wynne-Jones
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Effect of Baduanjin exercise on cervical spondylosis: A protocol for the systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liang Zou; Chongfu Zhong; Xiaohui Xu; Fanjie Liu; Congan Wang; Bin Shi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  ACDF vs TDR for patients with cervical spondylosis - an 8 year follow up study.

Authors:  Bolong Zheng; Dingjun Hao; Hua Guo; Baorong He
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Mid-term efficacy and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion in cervical spondylosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guo-Sheng Zhao; Qiao Zhang; Zheng-Xue Quan
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-12-02

6.  Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients with Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL) After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Baoyang Zhang; Shaoqing Li; Dechao Miao; Chong Zhao; Linfeng Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-07-09

7.  Automated detection of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in plain lateral radiographs of the cervical spine using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Masataka Miura; Satoshi Maki; Kousei Miura; Hiroshi Takahashi; Masayuki Miyagi; Gen Inoue; Kazuma Murata; Takamitsu Konishi; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Masashi Takaso; Kenji Endo; Seiji Ohtori; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapies for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Vanessa M Doulames; Giles W Plant
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Association between Cervical Spondylosis and Migraine: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wang-Sheng Lin; Tung-Fu Huang; Tien-Yow Chuang; Cheng-Li Lin; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The prevalence and associated factors of symptomatic cervical Spondylosis in Chinese adults: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yanwei Lv; Wei Tian; Dafang Chen; Yajun Liu; Lifang Wang; Fangfang Duan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.