Literature DB >> 26833706

Fast search algorithms for computational protein design.

Seydou Traoré1,2,3, Kyle E Roberts4, David Allouche5, Bruce R Donald4, Isabelle André1,2,3, Thomas Schiex5, Sophie Barbe1,2,3.   

Abstract

One of the main challenges in computational protein design (CPD) is the huge size of the protein sequence and conformational space that has to be computationally explored. Recently, we showed that state-of-the-art combinatorial optimization technologies based on Cost Function Network (CFN) processing allow speeding up provable rigid backbone protein design methods by several orders of magnitudes. Building up on this, we improved and injected CFN technology into the well-established CPD package Osprey to allow all Osprey CPD algorithms to benefit from associated speedups. Because Osprey fundamentally relies on the ability of A* to produce conformations in increasing order of energy, we defined new A* strategies combining CFN lower bounds, with new side-chain positioning-based branching scheme. Beyond the speedups obtained in the new A*-CFN combination, this novel branching scheme enables a much faster enumeration of suboptimal sequences, far beyond what is reachable without it. Together with the immediate and important speedups provided by CFN technology, these developments directly benefit to all the algorithms that previously relied on the DEE/ A* combination inside Osprey* and make it possible to solve larger CPD problems with provable algorithms.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational protein design; computer-aided protein design; cost function networks; deterministic search methods; exact combinatorial optimization; global minimum energy conformation; near-optimal solutions; search heuristics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26833706      PMCID: PMC4828276          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  33 in total

1.  Branch-and-terminate: a combinatorial optimization algorithm for protein design.

Authors:  D B Gordon; S L Mayo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

3.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Protein design is NP-hard.

Authors:  Niles A Pierce; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2002-10

5.  Solving and analyzing side-chain positioning problems using linear and integer programming.

Authors:  Carleton L Kingsford; Bernard Chazelle; Mona Singh
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Predicting resistance mutations using protein design algorithms.

Authors:  Kathleen M Frey; Ivelin Georgiev; Bruce R Donald; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction.

Authors:  Justin B Siegel; Alexandre Zanghellini; Helena M Lovick; Gert Kiss; Abigail R Lambert; Jennifer L St Clair; Jasmine L Gallaher; Donald Hilvert; Michael H Gelb; Barry L Stoddard; Kendall N Houk; Forrest E Michael; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  An adaptive dynamic programming algorithm for the side chain placement problem.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Brian Kuhlman; Jack Snoeyink
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2005

9.  Amino-acid site variability among natural and designed proteins.

Authors:  Eleisha L Jackson; Noah Ollikainen; Arthur W Covert; Tanja Kortemme; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Accurate design of co-assembling multi-component protein nanomaterials.

Authors:  Neil P King; Jacob B Bale; William Sheffler; Dan E McNamara; Shane Gonen; Tamir Gonen; Todd O Yeates; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  LUTE (Local Unpruned Tuple Expansion): Accurate Continuously Flexible Protein Design with General Energy Functions and Rigid Rotamer-Like Efficiency.

Authors:  Mark A Hallen; Jonathan D Jou; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  BBK* (Branch and Bound Over K*): A Provable and Efficient Ensemble-Based Protein Design Algorithm to Optimize Stability and Binding Affinity Over Large Sequence Spaces.

Authors:  Adegoke A Ojewole; Jonathan D Jou; Vance G Fowler; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Protein Design by Provable Algorithms.

Authors:  Mark A Hallen; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Commun ACM       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Algorithms for protein design.

Authors:  Pablo Gainza; Hunter M Nisonoff; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Recent advances in automated protein design and its future challenges.

Authors:  Dani Setiawan; Jeffrey Brender; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 6.098

6.  CATS (Coordinates of Atoms by Taylor Series): protein design with backbone flexibility in all locally feasible directions.

Authors:  Mark A Hallen; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.