Hyun Kim1, Rebecca M Schwartz2, Jerrold Hirsch3, Robert Silverman4, Bian Liu5, Emanuela Taioli5. 1. 1School of Public Health,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,Minnesota. 2. 2North Shore-LIJ Health System,Department of Occupational Medicine,Epidemiology and Prevention,Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine,Great Neck,New York. 3. 3North Shore-LIJ Health System,Strategic Planning,Great Neck,New York. 4. 4North Shore-LIJ Health System,Department of Emergency Medicine,Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine,New Hyde Park,New York. 5. 5Department of Population Health Science and Policy and Institute for Translational Epidemiology,The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of Hurricane Sandy on Long Island mental health emergency department (ED) visits and to determine whether these visits varied according to patient demographics or geographic area and intensity of the impact. METHODS: Individual-level de-identified data were extracted from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System from New York State ED visits from October 1 to December 2012 for residents of Nassau and Suffolk counties in Long Island. The dates of the ED visits were grouped into 4 periods: (1) pre-Sandy, October 1-28; (2) during Sandy, October 29; (3) post-Sandy I, October 30 to November 1; and (4) post-Sandy II, November 2-30. RESULTS: A total of 126,337 ED visits were recorded among 23 EDs. A significant drop in volume was observed on October 29; 399 more ED visits for physical health diagnoses were identified in the post-Sandy I period than in the pre-Sandy period. "Diseases of the respiratory system" was the only diagnosis group that showed a positive trend in the post-Sandy I period compared with the pre-Sandy period (increase of 4%). No significant changes in mental health visits were observed after Sandy landfall. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that the critical temporal window during which ED resources should be increased is in the immediate aftermath of a hurricane. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:344-350).
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of Hurricane Sandy on Long Island mental health emergency department (ED) visits and to determine whether these visits varied according to patient demographics or geographic area and intensity of the impact. METHODS: Individual-level de-identified data were extracted from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System from New York State ED visits from October 1 to December 2012 for residents of Nassau and Suffolk counties in Long Island. The dates of the ED visits were grouped into 4 periods: (1) pre-Sandy, October 1-28; (2) during Sandy, October 29; (3) post-Sandy I, October 30 to November 1; and (4) post-Sandy II, November 2-30. RESULTS: A total of 126,337 ED visits were recorded among 23 EDs. A significant drop in volume was observed on October 29; 399 more ED visits for physical health diagnoses were identified in the post-Sandy I period than in the pre-Sandy period. "Diseases of the respiratory system" was the only diagnosis group that showed a positive trend in the post-Sandy I period compared with the pre-Sandy period (increase of 4%). No significant changes in mental health visits were observed after Sandy landfall. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that the critical temporal window during which ED resources should be increased is in the immediate aftermath of a hurricane. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:344-350).
Entities:
Keywords:
epidemiology; health system utilization; morbidity; natural disaster preparedness
Authors: Eric S Toner; Meghan McGinty; Monica Schoch-Spana; Dale A Rose; Matthew Watson; Erin Echols; Eric G Carbone Journal: Health Secur Date: 2017 Jan/Feb
Authors: Lisa M Gargano; Sean Locke; Hannah T Jordan; Robert M Brackbill Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2018-01-21 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Meilin Yan; Ander Wilson; Francesca Dominici; Yun Wang; Mohammad Al-Hamdan; William Crosson; Andrea Schumacher; Seth Guikema; Sheryl Magzamen; Jennifer L Peel; Roger D Peng; G Brooke Anderson Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Kate R Weinberger; Erin R Kulick; Amelia K Boehme; Shengzhi Sun; Francesca Dominici; Gregory A Wellenius Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rebecca M Schwartz; Christina N Gillezeau; Bian Liu; Wil Lieberman-Cribbin; Emanuela Taioli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kevin C Heslin; Marguerite L Barrett; Molly Hensche; Gary Pickens; Jeanne S Ringel; Zeynal Karaca; Pamela L Owens Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 5.556