Literature DB >> 26831113

On the universal structure of human lexical semantics.

Hyejin Youn1, Logan Sutton2, Eric Smith3, Cristopher Moore4, Jon F Wilkins5, Ian Maddieson6, William Croft7, Tanmoy Bhattacharya8.   

Abstract

How universal is human conceptual structure? The way concepts are organized in the human brain may reflect distinct features of cultural, historical, and environmental background in addition to properties universal to human cognition. Semantics, or meaning expressed through language, provides indirect access to the underlying conceptual structure, but meaning is notoriously difficult to measure, let alone parameterize. Here, we provide an empirical measure of semantic proximity between concepts using cross-linguistic dictionaries to translate words to and from languages carefully selected to be representative of worldwide diversity. These translations reveal cases where a particular language uses a single "polysemous" word to express multiple concepts that another language represents using distinct words. We use the frequency of such polysemies linking two concepts as a measure of their semantic proximity and represent the pattern of these linkages by a weighted network. This network is highly structured: Certain concepts are far more prone to polysemy than others, and naturally interpretable clusters of closely related concepts emerge. Statistical analysis of the polysemies observed in a subset of the basic vocabulary shows that these structural properties are consistent across different language groups, and largely independent of geography, environment, and the presence or absence of a literary tradition. The methods developed here can be applied to any semantic domain to reveal the extent to which its conceptual structure is, similarly, a universal attribute of human cognition and language use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conceptual structure; human cognition; network comparison; polysemy; semantic universals

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26831113      PMCID: PMC4763760          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520752113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals.

Authors:  Michael Dunn; Simon J Greenhill; Stephen C Levinson; Russell D Gray
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: a study of cutting and breaking.

Authors:  Asifa Majid; James S Boster; Melissa Bowerman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-10-22

3.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.

Authors:  Nicholas Evans; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family.

Authors:  Remco Bouckaert; Philippe Lemey; Michael Dunn; Simon J Greenhill; Alexander V Alekseyenko; Alexei J Drummond; Russell D Gray; Marc A Suchard; Quentin D Atkinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  The weirdest people in the world?

Authors:  Joseph Henrich; Steven J Heine; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns.

Authors:  S Choi; M Bowerman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-12
  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment.

Authors:  Bill Thompson; Seán G Roberts; Gary Lupyan
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-08-10

Review 2.  Beyond the Benchmarks: Toward Human-Like Lexical Representations.

Authors:  Suzanne Stevenson; Paola Merlo
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Examining word association networks: A cross-country comparison of women's perceptions of HPV testing and vaccination.

Authors:  Bernd C Schmid; Jamie Carlson; Günther A Rezniczek; Jessica Wyllie; Kenneth Jaaback; Filip Vencovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Q&A: What is human language, when did it evolve and why should we care?

Authors:  Mark Pagel
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  Cross-Linguistic Data Formats, advancing data sharing and re-use in comparative linguistics.

Authors:  Robert Forkel; Johann-Mattis List; Simon J Greenhill; Christoph Rzymski; Sebastian Bank; Michael Cysouw; Harald Hammarström; Martin Haspelmath; Gereon A Kaiping; Russell D Gray
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.444

6.  From Text to Thought: How Analyzing Language Can Advance Psychological Science.

Authors:  Joshua Conrad Jackson; Joseph Watts; Johann-Mattis List; Curtis Puryear; Ryan Drabble; Kristen A Lindquist
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-04

7.  Colexification Networks Encode Affective Meaning.

Authors:  Anna Di Natale; Max Pellert; David Garcia
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  Languages Support Efficient Communication about the Environment: Words for Snow Revisited.

Authors:  Terry Regier; Alexandra Carstensen; Charles Kemp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Knowledge gaps in the early growth of semantic feature networks.

Authors:  Ann E Sizemore; Elisabeth A Karuza; Chad Giusti; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-09-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.