Literature DB >> 26830782

Revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: national trends and in-hospital outcomes.

Brian E Schwartz1, Hristo I Piponov2, Cory W Helder1, William F Mayers1, Mark H Gonzalez1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the increasing number of primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) being performed, the frequency of revision surgery is also expected to increase. We analysed the immediate in-hospital complications and epidemiologic data of 3,469 revision and 18,186 primary THA cases.
METHODS: The National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) was evaluated between 2001 and 2010 for patients who underwent revision and primary THA. Patients were identified and included in our retrospective study based on ICD-9 procedure codes.
RESULTS: The number of primary and revision THAs increased steadily from 2001 to 2010. The revision burden decreased for the same studied period (r = -0.92) to reach 13.9 % in 2010. The South region had higher revision burden of 17.4 % (p < 0.001). The primary THA group was more likely to be obese, morbidly obese, and have hypertension (p < 0.001). The revision THA group had an increased rate of blood transfusions (p < 0.001), deep venous thrombosis (p = 0.008), post-operative sepsis (p < 0.001), and wound complications (p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was also higher for the revision THA group (0.6 % versus 0.2 %, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The revision burden has undergone a steady decrease over the ten years studied and the reason for this is likely multifactorial. The South region had a significantly higher revision burden when compared to the rest of the United States. Larger hospitals tend to perform relatively more revisions. Revision THA patients are associated with longer hospital stay, higher complications rate, and higher in-hospital mortality rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Revision; Revision burden; THA; Total hip arthroplasty; Trends

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26830782     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3121-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

Review 1.  Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets.

Authors:  G Labek; M Thaler; W Janda; M Agreiter; B Stöckl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-03

2.  Does body mass index affect clinical outcome post-operatively and at five years after primary unilateral total hip replacement performed for osteoarthritis? A multivariate analysis of prospective data.

Authors:  A M Davis; A M Wood; A C M Keenan; I J Brenkel; J A Ballantyne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-09

3.  Pooled outcome of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system: a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Wolfgang Janda; Mark Agreiter; Rauend Rauf; Andreas Leithner; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Revision total joint arthroplasty: the epidemiology of 63,140 cases in New York State.

Authors:  Ankit Bansal; Omar N Khatib; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Fionna Mowat; Kevin Ong; Nathan Chan; Edmund Lau; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Hip arthroplasty in patients with sickle-cell haemoglobinopathy.

Authors:  M T Acurio; R J Friedman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

7.  Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome.

Authors:  Christian Inngul; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Role of obesity on the risk for total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Bourne; Shaheena Mukhi; Naisu Zhu; Margaret Keresteci; Mihaela Marin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger.

Authors:  James P McAuley; Edward S Szuszczewicz; Anthony Young; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Increased risk of revision for infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients with total hip replacements.

Authors:  Johannes Cornelis Schrama; Anne M Fenstad; Håvard Dale; Leif Havelin; Geir Hallan; Søren Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Pekka Pulkkinen; Antti Eskelinen; Keijo Mäkelä; Lars B Engesæter; Bjørg-Tilde Fevang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  18 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital prosthesis-related complications following total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample database study.

Authors:  Qinfeng Yang; Jian Wang; Yichuan Xu; Yuhang Chen; Qiang Lian; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The cement-in-cement technique is a reliable option in hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Ana Daniela Pereira; Renato Andrade; André Sarmento; Ricardo Sousa; Olufemi R Ayeni; João Espregueira-Mendes; Daniel Soares
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-07-14

4.  Influence of body mass index on sagittal hip range of motion and gait speed recovery six months after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pierre Martz; Abderrahmane Bourredjem; Jean Francis Maillefert; Christine Binquet; Emmanuel Baulot; Paul Ornetti; Davy Laroche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Planning revision hip arthroplasty : What are the structural requirements?]

Authors:  Wolfram Mittelmeier; Katrin Osmanski-Zenk
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-23

6.  Does femoral stem choice influence fracture type or incidence for direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Dylan B Combs; Scott T Nishioka; Samantha N Andrews; Joseph Varcadipane; Cass K Nakasone
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate is a marker for postoperative complications following aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron Z Chen; Alex Gu; Nicolas A Selemon; Jordan S Cohen; Chapman Wei; Haley Tornberg; Marc D Chodos; Joshua Campbell; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-08

8.  A Method for Prediction of Femoral Component of Hip Prosthesis Durability due to Aseptic Loosening by Using Coffin/Manson Fatigue Model.

Authors:  Branislav Krivokapic; Zoran Blagojevic; Dora Selesi; Teodor Atanackovic; Stevan Pilipovic; Zoran Bascarevic; Vladan Stevanovic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Preservation of the Acetabular Cup During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Novel Mini-navigation Tool: A Case Report.

Authors:  John Vincent; Ibrahim Alshaygy; Jeffrey M Muir; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

10.  Increased risk of complications in patients with hypoalbuminemia undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicole D Rynecki; Dominick V Congiusta; Michael Fields; Rushi Patel; Michael M Vosbikian; Irfan H Ahmed
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.