Karen A Kinnaman1, Heidi H Kimberly2, Emanuele Pivetta3, Elke Platz2, Avni Chudgar4, Alexander Adduci4, Michael B Stone2, Joshua S Rempell2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The suprasternal notch view (SSNV) is an additional echocardiographic view not routinely used by emergency physicians (EPs) performing focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS). OBJECTIVE: This pilot study determined the ease and self-perceived accuracy of the SSNV as performed by EPs. Additionally, we assessed the accuracy of FOCUS including the SSNV in thoracic aortic measurements compared to chest CT angiography (CTA). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, pilot study of adult patients undergoing chest CTA. Thoracic aortic measurements were recorded at the sinus of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and ascending aorta at its widest diameter in the parasternal long axis (PSL) view and SSNV. EPs rated ease of acquisition and self-perceived accuracy of thoracic aorta measurements. Two blinded radiologists performed thoracic aortic CTA measurements at predefined locations corresponding to the ultrasound measurements. RESULTS: Of the 79 patients (median age 57 years) enrolled, the SSNV was obtained in 97% of cases. EPs rated the ease of obtaining the SSNV as "easy" in 64.5% of cases and "very difficult" in 7.6% of cases. The mean difference between ultrasound (FOCUS plus SSNV) and CTA measurements were 1.2 mm (95% limits of agreement -2.9 to 5.3) at the sinus of Valsalva, 1.0 mm (95% limits of agreement -5.5 to 3.6 mm) at the sinotubular junction, 0.8 mm (95% limits of agreement -6.2 to 4.6 mm) at the proximal ascending aorta, and 0.6 mm (95% limits of agreement -2.8 to 4.0) at the aortic arch. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the SSNV is an easily attainable and accurate view of the thoracic aorta that can be obtained by EPs in the majority of ED patients.
BACKGROUND: The suprasternal notch view (SSNV) is an additional echocardiographic view not routinely used by emergency physicians (EPs) performing focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS). OBJECTIVE: This pilot study determined the ease and self-perceived accuracy of the SSNV as performed by EPs. Additionally, we assessed the accuracy of FOCUS including the SSNV in thoracic aortic measurements compared to chest CT angiography (CTA). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, pilot study of adult patients undergoing chest CTA. Thoracic aortic measurements were recorded at the sinus of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and ascending aorta at its widest diameter in the parasternal long axis (PSL) view and SSNV. EPs rated ease of acquisition and self-perceived accuracy of thoracic aorta measurements. Two blinded radiologists performed thoracic aortic CTA measurements at predefined locations corresponding to the ultrasound measurements. RESULTS: Of the 79 patients (median age 57 years) enrolled, the SSNV was obtained in 97% of cases. EPs rated the ease of obtaining the SSNV as "easy" in 64.5% of cases and "very difficult" in 7.6% of cases. The mean difference between ultrasound (FOCUS plus SSNV) and CTA measurements were 1.2 mm (95% limits of agreement -2.9 to 5.3) at the sinus of Valsalva, 1.0 mm (95% limits of agreement -5.5 to 3.6 mm) at the sinotubular junction, 0.8 mm (95% limits of agreement -6.2 to 4.6 mm) at the proximal ascending aorta, and 0.6 mm (95% limits of agreement -2.8 to 4.0) at the aortic arch. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the SSNV is an easily attainable and accurate view of the thoracic aorta that can be obtained by EPs in the majority of ED patients.
Authors: Julius M Gardin; David B Adams; Pamela S Douglas; Harvey Feigenbaum; David H Forst; Alan G Fraser; Paul A Grayburn; Alan S Katz; Andrew M Keller; Richard E Kerber; Bijoy K Khandheria; Allan L Klein; Roberto M Lang; Luc A Pierard; Miguel A Quinones; Ingela Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: R Andrew Taylor; Isabel Oliva; Reinier Van Tonder; John Elefteriades; James Dziura; Christopher L Moore Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Steven A Goldstein; Arturo Evangelista; Suhny Abbara; Andrew Arai; Federico M Asch; Luigi P Badano; Michael A Bolen; Heidi M Connolly; Hug Cuéllar-Calàbria; Martin Czerny; Richard B Devereux; Raimund A Erbel; Rossella Fattori; Eric M Isselbacher; Joseph M Lindsay; Marti McCulloch; Hector I Michelena; Christoph A Nienaber; Jae K Oh; Mauro Pepi; Allen J Taylor; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jose Luis Zamorano; Harry Dietz; Kim Eagle; John Elefteriades; Guillaume Jondeau; Hervé Rousseau; Marc Schepens Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Raimund Erbel; Victor Aboyans; Catherine Boileau; Eduardo Bossone; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Holger Eggebrecht; Arturo Evangelista; Volkmar Falk; Herbert Frank; Oliver Gaemperli; Martin Grabenwöger; Axel Haverich; Bernard Iung; Athanasios John Manolis; Folkert Meijboom; Christoph A Nienaber; Marco Roffi; Hervé Rousseau; Udo Sechtem; Per Anton Sirnes; Regula S von Allmen; Christiaan J M Vrints Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Arthur J Labovitz; Vicki E Noble; Michelle Bierig; Steven A Goldstein; Robert Jones; Smadar Kort; Thomas R Porter; Kirk T Spencer; Vivek S Tayal; Kevin Wei Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.251