William R Hand1, William D Stoll1, Matthew D McEvoy2, Julie R McSwain1, Clark D Sealy3, Judith M Skoner4, Joshua D Hornig4, Paul A Tennant5, Bethany Wolf6, Terry A Day4. 1. Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 4. Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of algorithmic physiologic management on patients undergoing head and neck free tissue transfer and reconstruction. METHODS:Ninety-four adult patients were randomized to treatment and control groups. The blood pressure of the control group was managed consistent with contemporary standards. The treatment group was managed using an algorithm based on blood pressure and calculated physiologic values derived from arterial waveform analysis. Primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. RESULTS:ICU length of stay was decreased in the treatment group (33.7 vs 58.3 hours; p = .026). The complication rate was not increased in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: The goal-directed hemodynamic management algorithm decreased the ICU length of stay. Judicious use of vasoactive drugs and goal-directed fluid administration has a role in improving perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing head and neck free tissue transfer.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of algorithmic physiologic management on patients undergoing head and neck free tissue transfer and reconstruction. METHODS: Ninety-four adult patients were randomized to treatment and control groups. The blood pressure of the control group was managed consistent with contemporary standards. The treatment group was managed using an algorithm based on blood pressure and calculated physiologic values derived from arterial waveform analysis. Primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. RESULTS: ICU length of stay was decreased in the treatment group (33.7 vs 58.3 hours; p = .026). The complication rate was not increased in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: The goal-directed hemodynamic management algorithm decreased the ICU length of stay. Judicious use of vasoactive drugs and goal-directed fluid administration has a role in improving perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing head and neck free tissue transfer.
Authors: F Michard; S Boussat; D Chemla; N Anguel; A Mercat; Y Lecarpentier; C Richard; M R Pinsky; J L Teboul Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Birgitte Brandstrup; Hanne Tønnesen; Randi Beier-Holgersen; Else Hjortsø; Helle Ørding; Karen Lindorff-Larsen; Morten S Rasmussen; Charlotte Lanng; Lene Wallin; Lene H Iversen; Christina S Gramkow; Mette Okholm; Tine Blemmer; Poul-Erik Svendsen; Henrik H Rottensten; Birgit Thage; Jens Riis; Inge S Jeppesen; Dorthe Teilum; Anne Mette Christensen; Ben Graungaard; Frank Pott Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Timothy E Miller; Julie K Thacker; William D White; Christopher Mantyh; John Migaly; Juying Jin; Anthony M Roche; Eric L Eisenstein; Rex Edwards; Kevin J Anstrom; Richard E Moon; Tong J Gan Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Jan Benes; Ivan Chytra; Pavel Altmann; Marek Hluchy; Eduard Kasal; Roman Svitak; Richard Pradl; Martin Stepan Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Bryan J Dooley; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Marlena R Mcgill; Mahmoud I Awad; Jatin P Shah; Richard J Wong; Clara Broad; Babak J Mehrara; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Marie K Jessen; Mikael F Vallentin; Mathias J Holmberg; Maria Bolther; Frederik B Hansen; Johanne M Holst; Andreas Magnussen; Niklas S Hansen; Cecilie M Johannsen; Johannes Enevoldsen; Thomas H Jensen; Lara L Roessler; Peter C Lind; Maibritt P Klitholm; Mark A Eggertsen; Philip Caap; Caroline Boye; Karol M Dabrowski; Lasse Vormfenne; Maria Høybye; Jeppe Henriksen; Carl M Karlsson; Ida R Balleby; Marie S Rasmussen; Kim Pælestik; Asger Granfeldt; Lars W Andersen Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 11.719
Authors: Anna Wrzosek; Joanna Jakowicka-Wordliczek; Renata Zajaczkowska; Wojciech T Serednicki; Milosz Jankowski; Malgorzata M Bala; Mateusz J Swierz; Maciej Polak; Jerzy Wordliczek Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-12-12
Authors: Robert J Taylor; Rusha Patel; Bethany J Wolf; William D Stoll; Joshua D Hornig; Judith M Skoner; William R Hand; Terry A Day Journal: Microsurgery Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 2.425
Authors: John-Patrik Burkhard; Jelena Pfister; Roland Giger; Markus Huber; Claudia Lädrach; Manuel Waser; Radu Olariu; Dominique Engel; Lukas M Löffel; Benoît Schaller; Patrick Y Wuethrich Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 3.573