Literature DB >> 26826489

Evolution of genetic instability in heterogeneous tumors.

Ani D Asatryan1, Natalia L Komarova2.   

Abstract

Genetic instability is an important characteristic of cancer. While most cancers develop genetic instability at some stage of their progression, sometimes a temporary rise of instability is followed by the return to a relatively stable genome. Neither the reasons for these dynamics, nor, more generally, the role of instability in tumor progression, are well understood. In this paper we develop a class of mathematical models to study the evolutionary competition dynamics among different sub-populations in a heterogeneous tumor. We observe that despite the complexity of this multi-component and multi-process system, there is only a small number of scenarios expected in the context of the evolution of instability. If the penalty incurred by unstable cells (the decrease in the growth due to deleterious mutations) is high compared with the gain (the production rate of advantageous mutations), then instability does not evolve. In the opposite case, instability evolves and comes to dominate the system. In the intermediate parameter regime, instability is generated but later gives way to stable clones. Moreover, the model also informs us of the patterns of instability for cancer lineages corresponding to different stages of progression. It is predicted that mutations causing instability are merely "passengers" in tumors that have undergone only a small number of malignant mutations. Further down the path of carcinogenesis, however, unstable cells are more likely to give rise to the winning clonal wave that takes over the tumor and carries the evolution forward, thus conferring a causal role of the instability in such cases. Further, each individual clonal wave (i.e. cells harboring a fixed number of malignant driver mutations) experiences its own evolutionary history. It can fall under one of three types of temporal behavior: stable throughout, unstable to stable, or unstable throughout. Which scenario is realized depends on the subtle (but predictable) interplay among mutation rates and the death toll associated with the instability. The modeling approach provided here sheds light onto important aspects of the evolutionary dynamics of instability, which may be relevant to treatment scenarios that target instability or damage repair.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal instability; Driver mutation; Microsatellite instability; Passenger mutation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26826489      PMCID: PMC5680090          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  54 in total

1.  Telomere erosion and chromosomal instability in cells expressing the HPV oncogene 16E6.

Authors:  Annemieke W Plug-DeMaggio; Terri Sundsvold; Michelle A Wurscher; Jennifer I Koop; Aloysius J Klingelhutz; James K McDougall
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  A mutator phenotype in cancer.

Authors:  L A Loeb
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  A new role for hypoxia in tumor progression: induction of fragile site triggering genomic rearrangements and formation of complex DMs and HSRs.

Authors:  A Coquelle; F Toledo; S Stern; A Bieth; M Debatisse
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Telomerase-deficient mice with short telomeres are resistant to skin tumorigenesis.

Authors:  E González-Suárez; E Samper; J M Flores; M A Blasco
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins cooperate to induce mitotic defects and genomic instability by uncoupling centrosome duplication from the cell division cycle.

Authors:  S Duensing; L Y Lee; A Duensing; J Basile; S Piboonniyom; S Gonzalez; C P Crum; K Munger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Human cancers express mutator phenotypes: origin, consequences and targeting.

Authors:  Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  The optimal rate of chromosome loss for the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in cancer.

Authors:  Natalia L Komarova; Dominik Wodarz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time.

Authors:  Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression.

Authors:  Ruchira S Datta; Alice Gutteridge; Charles Swanton; Carlo C Maley; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 5.183

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Clonal cooperativity in heterogenous cancers.

Authors:  Hengbo Zhou; Deepika Neelakantan; Heide L Ford
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 2.  Determinants and clinical implications of chromosomal instability in cancer.

Authors:  Laurent Sansregret; Bart Vanhaesebroeck; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Mathematical modeling for mutator phenotype and clonal selection advantage in the risk analysis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Xingshi He; Xinshe Yang; Tianhai Tian; Lingling Li; Ting Zhao; Xinan Zhang
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 1.315

4.  Coal tar pitch extract could induce chromosomal instability of human bronchial epithelial cells mediated by spindle checkpoint-related proteins.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Zhitao Li; Na Wang; Guangcai Duan; Wei Wang; Yanming Feng; Yong Zhao; Lixia Wang; Hansong Zhu; Qiao Zhang; Xiaozhuan Liu; Weidong Wu; Yongjun Wu; Wu Yao; Jing Wang; Yiming Wu; Feifei Feng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

5.  A systematic approach to cancer: evolution beyond selection.

Authors:  William B Miller; John S Torday
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2017-01-03

6.  Correlations between Risk Factors for Breast Cancer and Genetic Instability in Cancer Patients-A Clinical Perspective Study.

Authors:  Márcia Fernanda Correia Jardim Paz; Marcus Vinícius Oliveira Barros de Alencar; Antonio Luiz Gomes Junior; Keylla da Conceição Machado; Muhammad Torequl Islam; Eunus S Ali; Manik Chandra Shill; Md Iqbal Ahmed; Shaikh Jamal Uddin; Ana Maria Oliveira Ferreira da Mata; Ricardo Melo de Carvalho; Kátia da Conceição Machado; André Luiz Pinho Sobral; Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro da Silva; João Marcelo de Castro E Souza; Daniel Dias Rufino Arcanjo; Paulo Michel Pinheiro Ferreira; Siddhartha Kumar Mishra; Juliana da Silva; Ana Amélia de Carvalho Melo-Cavalcante
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Adaptive dynamics of unstable cancer populations: The canonical equation.

Authors:  Guim Aguadé-Gorgorió; Ricard Solé
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Mathematical modelling the pathway of genomic instability in lung cancer.

Authors:  Lingling Li; Xinan Zhang; Tianhai Tian; Liuyong Pang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Pharmacological Effects and Toxicogenetic Impacts of Omeprazole: Genomic Instability and Cancer.

Authors:  Márcia Fernanda Correia Jardim Paz; Marcus Vinícius Oliveira Barros de Alencar; Rodrigo Maciel Paulino de Lima; André Luiz Pinho Sobral; Glauto Tuquarre Melo do Nascimento; Cristiane Amaral Dos Reis; Maria do Perpetuo Socorro de Sousa Coêlho; Maria Luísa Lima Barreto do Nascimento; Antonio Luiz Gomes Júnior; Kátia da Conceição Machado; Ag-Anne Pereira Melo de Menezes; Rosália Maria Torres de Lima; José Williams Gomes de Oliveira Filho; Ana Carolina Soares Dias; Antonielly Campinho Dos Reis; Ana Maria Oliveira Ferreira da Mata; Sônia Alves Machado; Carlos Dimas de Carvalho Sousa; Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro da Silva; Muhammad Torequl Islam; João Marcelo de Castro E Sousa; Ana Amélia de Carvalho Melo Cavalcante
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Stochastic multi-scale models of competition within heterogeneous cellular populations: Simulation methods and mean-field analysis.

Authors:  Roberto de la Cruz; Pilar Guerrero; Fabian Spill; Tomás Alarcón
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.