Literature DB >> 26825789

Preservation or Restoration of Segmental and Regional Spinal Lordosis Using Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Techniques in Degenerative Lumbar Conditions: A Literature Review.

Juan S Uribe1, Sue Lynn Myhre, Jim A Youssef.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A literature review.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review lumbar segmental and regional alignment changes following treatment with a variety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) interbody fusion procedures for short-segment, degenerative conditions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: An increasing number of lumbar fusions are being performed with minimally invasive exposures, despite a perception that minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion procedures are unable to affect segmental and regional lordosis.
METHODS: Through a MEDLINE and Google Scholar search, a total of 23 articles were identified that reported alignment following minimally invasive lumbar fusion for degenerative (nondeformity) lumbar spinal conditions to examine aggregate changes in postoperative alignment.
RESULTS: Of the 23 studies identified, 28 study cohorts were included in the analysis. Procedural cohorts included MIS ALIF (two), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) (16), and MIS posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (P/TLIF) (11). Across 19 study cohorts and 720 patients, weighted average of lumbar lordosis preoperatively for all procedures was 43.5° (range 28.4°-52.5°) and increased 3.4° (9%) (range -2° to 7.4°) postoperatively (P < 0.001). Segmental lordosis increased, on average, by 4° from a weighted average of 8.3° preoperatively (range -0.8° to 15.8°) to 11.2° at postoperative time points (range -0.2° to 22.8°) (P < 0.001) in 1182 patient from 24 study cohorts. Simple linear regression revealed a significant relationship between preoperative lumbar lordosis and change in lumbar lordosis (r = 0.413; P = 0.003), wherein lower preoperative lumbar lordosis predicted a greater increase in postoperative lumbar lordosis.
CONCLUSION: Significant gains in both weighted average lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis were seen following MIS interbody fusion. None of the segmental lordosis cohorts and only two of the 19 lumbar lordosis cohorts showed decreases in lordosis postoperatively. These results suggest that MIS approaches are able to impact regional and local segmental alignment and that preoperative patient factors can impact the extent of correction gained (preserving vs. restoring alignment). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26825789     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  The Deformity TLIF: Bilateral Facetectomy and Osteotomy Closure with a Hinged Table.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Kristen E Jones; David W Polly
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

2.  May the midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) prevent the early radiographic adjacent segment degeneration? A minimum 3-year follow-up comparative study of MIDLIF in L4/5 with cortical bone trajectory screw versus traditional pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Bo Han; Hongtao Ding; Yong Hai; Yuzeng Liu; Li Guan; Aixing Pan; Xinuo Zhang; Peng Yin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Static Versus Expandable Devices Provide Similar Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Benjamin Khechen; Brittany E Haws; Dil V Patel; Joon S Yoo; Jordan A Guntin; Kaitlyn L Cardinal; Sravisht Iyer; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-03-27

4.  Comparison of Stand-Alone, Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and Cranial vs Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and L4-5 for the Treatment of Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease.

Authors:  Deeptee Jain; Kushagra Verma; Jeffrey Mulvihill; Jun Mizutani; Bobby Tay; Shane Burch; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

5.  Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes following Combined Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Instrumentation for the Treatment of Degenerative Spine Deformity: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Can Zhang; Cheng Cheng; Fengzeng Jian; Hao Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Laterally Placed Expandable Interbody Spacers With and Without Adjustable Lordosis Improve Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Yan M Li; Zheng Huang; James Towner; Yan I Li; Brandon S Bucklen
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-09

8.  Predictors of Spontaneous Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis after Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases.

Authors:  Shuhei Ohyama; Yasuchika Aoki; Masahiro Inoue; Takayuki Nakajima; Yusuke Sato; Atsuya Watanabe; Hiroshi Takahashi; Go Kubota; Arata Nakajima; Junya Saito; Yawara Eguchi; Sumihisa Orita; Koichi Nakagawa; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-22

9.  Clinical and Radiographic Comparison Between Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Bilateral Facetectomies.

Authors:  Hai Le; Ryan Anderson; Eileen Phan; Joseph Wick; Joshua Barber; Rolando Roberto; Eric Klineberg; Yashar Javidan
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-22

10.  Surgical results of a one-stage combined anterior lumbosacral fusion and posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Chien-Yuan Huang; Kuang-Ting Yeh; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Ru-Ping Lee; Ing-Ho Chen; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Jen-Hung Wang; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.