Literature DB >> 26823058

Body composition changes after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis: a comparison with conventional Billroth I anastomosis.

Ki Bum Park1, Oh Kyoung Kwon2, Wansik Yu2, Byeong-Churl Jang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare body composition changes of patients undergoing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) with delta-shaped anastomosis (DSA) versus conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (CLDG).
METHODS: Data from gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for histologically proven gastric cancer in KNUMC from January 2013 to May 2014 were collected and reviewed. We examined 85 consecutive patients undergoing TLDG or CLDG: 41 patients underwent TLDG and 44 patients underwent CLDG. Body composition was assessed by segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. We compared the changes in nutritional parameters and body composition from preoperative status between the two groups at postoperative 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: All of the postoperative changes in the body composition and nutritional indices were similar between the two groups with the exception of visceral fat areas (VFAs) and albumin levels. VFAs increased at 6 months postoperatively in the TLDG group and a significant difference was shown at 12 months postoperatively between the TLDG and CLDG groups (86.7 ± 22.8 and 74.7 ± 21.9 cm(2), respectively, P < 0.05). Postoperative albumin levels were higher in the TLDG group with statistical significance at 6 and 12 months after surgery (6 months, P = 0.028; 12 months, P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: The influence of TLDG with DSA on nutrition and body composition seemed comparable to those of CLDG. Six months postoperatively, VFAs and albumin levels were recovered in the TLDG group but not in the CLDG group. Thus, TLDG seems to be a novel surgical method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; Delta-shaped anastomosis; Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26823058     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4744-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

Review 1.  Dumping syndrome: pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Andrew Ukleja
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 2.  Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of postoperative dumping syndrome.

Authors:  Jan Tack; Joris Arts; Philip Caenepeel; Dominiek De Wulf; Raf Bisschops
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Nutritional status of gastric cancer patients after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  J M Bae; J W Park; H K Yang; J P Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Qiuye Cheng; Tony C Y Pang; Michael J Hollands; Arthur J Richardson; Henry Pleass; Emma S Johnston; Vincent W T Lam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Postoperative changes in body composition after gastrectomy.

Authors:  Teruo Kiyama; Takashi Mizutani; Takeshi Okuda; Itsuro Fujita; Akira Tokunaga; Takashi Tajiri; Adrian Barbul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Joo-Ho Lee; Cha-Kyong Yom; Ho-Seong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  [Dumping syndrome in patients submitted to gastric resection].

Authors:  Isabel Rivera; Carmen Ibeth Ochoa-Martínez; José Manuel Hermosillo-Sandoval; Juan Manuel Morales-Amezcua; Clotilde Fuentes-Orozco; Alejandro González-Ojeda
Journal:  Cir Cir       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.361

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection for early gastric carcinoma: a review of 43 cases.

Authors:  Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Yasushi Kasai; Yasuaki Kanyama; Kenji Hibi; Katsuki Ito; Seiji Akiyama; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Complications of bariatric surgery: dumping syndrome, reflux and vitamin deficiencies.

Authors:  Jan Tack; Eveline Deloose
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.043

10.  Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis.

Authors:  Hidehiko Kitagami; Mamoru Morimoto; Masashi Nozawa; Kenichi Nakamura; Shinya Tanimura; Katsuhiko Murakawa; Yoshihiro Murakami; Kenji Kikuchi; Hajime Ushigome; Leo Sato; Minoru Yamamoto; Yasunobu Shimizu; Tetsushi Hayakawa; Moritsugu Tanaka; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; XiangHu Wu; Feng Zhu; Ming Shen; Rui Tian; ChengJian Shi; Xin Wang; GuangQin Xiao; XingJun Guo; Min Wang; RenYi Qin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Current status of intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy and modified delta-shape anastomosis after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yoontak Lee; Chun Hai Tan; Do Joong Park
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-09-09

Review 3.  A comparative study of delta-shaped and conventional Billroth I anastomosis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shu-Yan Wang; Jun Hong; Han-Kun Hao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Feasibility of augmented rectangle technique in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: comparison with hemi-double stapling technique in a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ryohei Nishiguchi; Takao Katsube; Takeshi Shimakawa; Shinichi Asaka; Miki Miyazawa; Kentaro Yamaguchi; Minoru Murayama; Takebumi Usui; Hajime Yokomizo; Seiji Ohigashi; Shunichi Shiozawa
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Comparison of Delta-Shape Anastomosis and Extracorporeal Billroth I Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Geng-Yuan Hu; Feng Tao; Ke-Wei Ji; Wei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Midterm body composition changes after open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ki Bum Park; Oh Kyoung Kwon; Wansik Yu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Prognostic significance of surgery-induced sarcopenia in the survival of gastric cancer patients: a sex-specific analysis.

Authors:  Ja Kyung Lee; Young Suk Park; Kanghaeng Lee; Sang Il Youn; Yongjoon Won; Sa-Hong Min; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 12.910

8.  A Comparison of Totally Laparoscopic Pylorus Preserving Gastrectomy and Laparoscopy-Assisted Pylorus Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Won Ho Han; Bang Wool Eom; Hong Man Yoon; Keun Won Ryu; Deok Hee Kim; Young-Woo Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-09-15

9.  Predictive factors for body weight loss and its impact on quality of life following gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuaki Tanabe; Masazumi Takahashi; Takashi Urushihara; Yoichi Nakamura; Makoto Yamada; Sang-Woong Lee; Shinnosuke Tanaka; Akira Miki; Masami Ikeda; Koji Nakada
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shunda Wang; Ning Shi; Lei You; Menghua Dai; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.