Literature DB >> 28765704

Predictive factors for body weight loss and its impact on quality of life following gastrectomy.

Kazuaki Tanabe1, Masazumi Takahashi1, Takashi Urushihara1, Yoichi Nakamura1, Makoto Yamada1, Sang-Woong Lee1, Shinnosuke Tanaka1, Akira Miki1, Masami Ikeda1, Koji Nakada1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the predictive factors and impact of body weight loss on postgastrectomy quality of life (QOL).
METHODS: We applied the newly developed integrated questionnaire postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45, which consists of 45 items including those from the Short Form-8 and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale instruments, in addition to 22 newly selected items. Between July 2009 and December 2010, completed questionnaires were received from 2520 patients with curative resection at 1 year or more after having undergone one of six types of gastrectomy for Stage I gastric cancer at one of 52 participating institutions. Of those, we analyzed 1777 eligible questionnaires from patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y procedure (TGRY) or distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I (DGBI) or Roux-en-Y (DGRY) procedures.
RESULTS: A total of 393, 475 and 909 patients underwent TGRY, DGRY, and DGBI, respectively. The mean age of patients was 62.1 ± 9.2 years. The mean time interval between surgery and retrieval of the questionnaires was 37.0 ± 26.8 mo. On multiple regression analysis, higher preoperative body mass index, total gastrectomy, and female sex, in that order, were independent predictors of greater body weight loss after gastrectomy. There was a significant difference in the degree of weight loss (P < 0.001) among groups stratified according to preoperative body mass index (< 18.5, 18.5-25 and > 25 kg/m2). Multiple linear regression analysis identified lower postoperative body mass index, rather than greater body weight loss postoperatively, as a certain factor for worse QOL (P < 0.0001) after gastrectomy, but the influence of both such factors on QOL was relatively small (R2, 0.028-0.080).
CONCLUSION: While it is certainly important to maintain adequate body weight after gastrectomy, the impact of body weight loss on QOL is unexpectedly small.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrectomy; Postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45; Quality of life; Weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765704      PMCID: PMC5514648          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i26.4823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


Core tip: Our study of almost 1800 gastrectomy patients revealed that higher preoperative body mass index, total gastrectomy, and female sex were independent predictors of greater body weight loss after gastrectomy. Moreover, we determined lower postoperative body mass index, rather than greater postoperative weight loss, as a certain factor of worse quality of life (QOL), although the effect was not substantial. We believe that this contribution is theoretically and practically relevant in the current context of gastric cancer treatment and recovery because early diagnosis and improved treatments have led to increased long-term survival postgastrectomy, highlighting the need for better QOL.

INTRODUCTION

Despite its gradually decreasing incidence, gastric cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in the world[1]. Surgical resection and regional lymphadenectomy are the only curative options for patients with localized gastric tumors[2-4]. As early diagnosis and improved treatment have led to longer-term survival, patients are now more aware of the morbidities associated with gastrectomy, which is called postgastrectomy syndrome. Indeed, the gastrectomized patients may experience various nutritional and functional problems that interfere with their quality of life (QOL)[5-7]. Loss of body weight is a common complaint after gastrectomy, and is thought as one of few objective indices to measure the well-being of postgastrectomy patients. Some reports suggest that the type of gastrectomy is a certain predictor of postoperative weight loss[6,8,9], however, other predictive factors for postoperative weight loss has yet not been determined. Though the low body mass index (BMI) as well as body weight loss is often identified after gastrectomy and may affects the QOL after gastrectomy[10], their detail implication on the QOL has not been clarified. The aim of the present study was to determine the predictive factors for postoperative weight loss and to investigate the impact of body weight loss and low BMI on the QOL in patients after gastrectomy using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45, which was established specifically to assess symptoms, living status and QOL among patients after gastrectomy[11].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PGSAS study, a surveillance study involving 52 institutions, was conducted by the Japanese Postgastrectomy Syndrome Working Party (JPGSWP) and approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions. After completion of the informed consent process, patients were enrolled in this study if they met the following eligibility criteria: 20-75 years of age, histologically proven Stage I gastric cancer based on the 13th edition of the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma[12], curative resection at least 1 year after surgery, no signs of recurrence at the point of assessment, and no other active malignancy. The PGSAS-45 questionnaire consists of 45 questions, with 8 items from the Short Form-8 (SF-8)[13], 15 items from the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale[14], and 22 clinically important items determined by the JPGSWP. Patients were given the questionnaire together with a stamped and addressed envelope in the outpatient clinic and were asked to complete questionnaire and return it by post to the data center. Of the 2922 patients to whom questionnaires were given during July 2009 to December 2010, 2520 (86%) responded and 2368 (81%) were confirmed to be eligible for the original study. Of these, the data from 1777 patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (TGRY) and distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I (DGBI) or Roux-en-Y (DGRY) were analyzed in this study.

Statistical analysis

The degree of body weight loss was compared among the three relevant preoperative BMI groups (BMI, < 18.5, 18.5-25 and > 25 kg/m2) by multiple comparisons. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the factors affecting body weight loss after surgery, and to study the impact of the change in body weight and postoperative BMI on QOL. A P value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. To evaluate effect sizes, Cohen’s d, standardization coefficient of regression (β) and coefficient of determination (R2) were used. Interpretation of effect sizes were ≥ 0.2 small, ≥ 0.5 medium, and ≥ 0.8 large in Cohen’s d; ≥ 0.1 small, ≥ 0.3 medium, and ≥ 0.5 large in β; ≥ 0.02 small, ≥ 0.13 medium, and ≥ 0.26 large in R2. All statistical analyses were performed by biostatisticians who primarily used Stat View for Windows Ver. 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

A CONSORT flowchart of the PGSAS study is shown in Figure 1. A total of 1777 patients (1188 men; 66.9%) who underwent conventional gastrectomy were enrolled in this study. The mean age of patients was 62.1 ± 9.2 years. The numbers of patients undergoing each operative procedure were as follows: TGRY, 393; DGRY, 475; and DGBI, 909. The mean time interval between surgery and retrieval of the questionnaires was 37.0 ± 26.8 mo, and the mean body weight loss among postgastrectomy patients was 9.5% ± 8.0% at that time (Table 1).
Figure 1

CONSORT flowchart of the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Study (PGSAS study). TGRY: Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; DGRY: Distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; DGBI: Distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction; PPG: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy; PG: Proximal gastrectomy; LR: Local resection.

Table 1

Characteristics of patients after conventional gastrectomy

Sex [male: n (%)]1188 (66.9)
Age (yr, mean ± SD)62.1 ± 9.2
Type of gastrectomy (n: TGRY/DGBI/DGRY)393/909/475
Period after gastrectomy (mo: mean ± SD)37.0 ± 26.8
Change in body weight (%, mean ± SD)-9.5 ± 8.0
Preoperative BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD)22.8 ± 3.1
Postoperative BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD)20.6 ± 2.8
Approach (n, open/laparoscopic)1102 ± 664
Preservation of celiac branch of vagus (Y/N)173/1567

BMI: Body mass index.

Characteristics of patients after conventional gastrectomy BMI: Body mass index. CONSORT flowchart of the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Study (PGSAS study). TGRY: Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; DGRY: Distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; DGBI: Distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction; PPG: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy; PG: Proximal gastrectomy; LR: Local resection.

QOL measures in the PGSAS-45

The PGSAS-45 is an integrated questionnaire for assessing the symptoms, the living status and the QOL in patients after gastrectomy, as described previously[11]. The structure of the PGSAS-45 is shown in Table 2. QOL scores in the PGSAS-45 were obtained for two subdomains: dissatisfaction and the SF-8 items. The dissatisfaction subdomain consists of four outcome measures based on symptoms (item 43), meals (item 44), working (item 45), and daily life subscale (mean of the item 43-45). The SF-8 consists of eight items and generates two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary. The mean values of main outcome measures are shown in Table 3.
Table 2

Structure of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45 (domains/subdomains/items/subscales)

DomainsSubdomainsItemsSubscales
QOLSF-8 (QOL)1Physical functioning1Physical component summary1 (item 1-8)
2Role physical1Mental component summary1 (item 1-8)
3Bodily pain1
4General health1
5Vitality1
6Social functioning1
7Role emotional1
8Mental health1
SymptomsGSRS (Symptoms)9Abdominal painsEsophageal reflux subscale (item 10, 11, 13, 24)
10HeartburnAbdominal pain subscale (item 9, 12, 28)
11Acid regurgitationMeal-related distress subscale (item 25-27)
12Sucking sensations in the epigastriumIndigestion subscale (item 14-17)
13Nausea and vomitingDiarrhea subscale (item 19, 20, 22)
14BorborygmusConstipation subscale (item 18, 21, 23)
15Abdominal distensionDumping subscale (item 30, 31, 33)
16Nausea and vomiting
17Increased flatusTotal symptom scale (above seven subscales)
18Decreased passage of stools
19Increased passage of stools
20Loose stools
21Hard stools
22Urgent need for defecation
23Feeling of incomplete evacuation
Symptoms24Bile regurgitation
25Sense of foods sticking
26Postprandial fullness
27Early satiation
28Lower abdominal pains
29Number and type of early dumping symptoms
30Early dumping general symptoms
31Early dumping abdominal symptoms
32Number and type of late dumping symptoms
33Late dumping symptoms
Living statusMeals (amount) 134Ingested amount of food per meal1
35Ingested amount of food per day1
36Frequency of main meals
37Frequency of additional meals
Meals (quality)38Appetite1Quality of ingestion subscale1 (item 38-40)
39Hunger feeling1
40Satiety feeling1
Meals (amount) 241Necessity for additional meals
Social activity42Ability for working
QOLDissatisfaction (QOL)43Dissatisfaction with symptomsDissatisfaction for daily life subscale (item 43-45)
44Dissatisfaction at the meals
45Dissatisfaction at working

Higher scores indicate better conditions. Each subscales is calculated as the mean of its composite items or subscales, except the physical and mental component summaries of SF-8. Items 29 and 32 do not have scores; these were analyzed separately. PGSAS-45: Postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45; SF-8: Short form-8; QOL: Quality of life; GSRS: Gastrointestinal symptom rating scale.

Table 3

Main outcome measures of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45 quality of life domain in patients after conventional gastrectomy (n = 1777)

SubdomainsItem in PGSAS-45Main outcomes measuresScalemean ±SD
Dissatisfaction43Dissatisfaction with symptomsFive-point Likert scale1.87 ± 0.95
44Dissatisfaction at the meals1.13
45Dissatisfaction at working1.79 ± 0.97
43-45Dissatisfaction for daily life subscale0.87
SF-81-8Physical component summary1Five or six-point Likert scale50.4 ± 5.6
1-8Mental component summary149.7 ± 5.8

Higher score indicating better condition. Integrated subscales (SS) are underlined in the Table. PGSAS-45: Postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45; SF-8: Short form-8.

Structure of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45 (domains/subdomains/items/subscales) Higher scores indicate better conditions. Each subscales is calculated as the mean of its composite items or subscales, except the physical and mental component summaries of SF-8. Items 29 and 32 do not have scores; these were analyzed separately. PGSAS-45: Postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45; SF-8: Short form-8; QOL: Quality of life; GSRS: Gastrointestinal symptom rating scale. Main outcome measures of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45 quality of life domain in patients after conventional gastrectomy (n = 1777) Higher score indicating better condition. Integrated subscales (SS) are underlined in the Table. PGSAS-45: Postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45; SF-8: Short form-8.

Factors affecting postoperative weight loss

To clarify the predictive factors affecting change in body weight after surgery, multiple regression analysis was performed. In order of significance, higher preoperative BMI, type of gastrectomy (TGRY) and female sex were the independent predictors for postoperative weight loss (Table 4).
Table 4

Factors influencing body weight loss after gastrectomy (multiple regression analysis)

VariablesChange in body weight
βP value
Type of gastrectomy (DGBI)0.204< 0.0001
Type of gastrectomy (DGRY)0.116< 0.0001
Postoperative period (mo)(-0.02)NS
Age (yr)(-0.04)0.0746
Gender (male)0.120< 0.0001
Preoperative BMI (kg/m2)-0.3561< 0.0001
Approach (Laparoscopic)(0.01)NS
Celiac branch of vagus (Preserved)(0.074)0.0010
R2 (P value)0.216< 0.0001
The interpretation of effect sizeβR2
None-very small< (0.100)< (0.020)
Small> 0.100> 0.020
Medium> 0.3001> 0.1301
Large> 0.500> 0.260

Integrated subscales. Higher score indicative of a better condition. If β is positive, the score of the outcome measure of the patients belonging to the category in (brackets) is higher in cases when the factor is a nominal scale, and the score of outcome measure of the patients with larger values is higher in cases when the factor is a numeral scale. DGBI: Distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I; DGRY: Distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y.

Factors influencing body weight loss after gastrectomy (multiple regression analysis) Integrated subscales. Higher score indicative of a better condition. If β is positive, the score of the outcome measure of the patients belonging to the category in (brackets) is higher in cases when the factor is a nominal scale, and the score of outcome measure of the patients with larger values is higher in cases when the factor is a numeral scale. DGBI: Distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I; DGRY: Distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y.

Relationship between preoperative BMI and change in body weight

Considering that preoperative BMI was the most influential factor affecting weight loss postoperatively, we compared the degree of weight loss among three relevant preoperative BMI groups: < 18.5; 18.5-25; and 25 < (kg/m2) (Figure 2). There was a significant difference between each group (P < 0.0001) with a certain effect size in terms of Cohen’s d. The patients with higher BMI (> 25 kg/m2) exhibited the greatest weight loss (12.3%) among the groups, while the degree of weight loss in patients with lower BMI < (18.5) was spare (2%).
Figure 2

Preoperative body mass index strongly influences change in body weight postoperatively. Bars represent the mean change in body weight (mean ± SD); effect size for group difference are reported as Cohen’s d (P < 0.0001). BMI: Body mass index.

Preoperative body mass index strongly influences change in body weight postoperatively. Bars represent the mean change in body weight (mean ± SD); effect size for group difference are reported as Cohen’s d (P < 0.0001). BMI: Body mass index.

Impact of change in body weight and postoperative BMI on QOL

Finally, we performed multiple regression analysis to compare the influence on postoperative QOL between body weight loss and low postoperative BMI (Tables 5 and 6). The low postoperative BMI significantly affected on all QOL outcome measures with small but clinically meaningful effect size in terms of standardized partial regression coefficient (β), while the body weight loss only affected on some of QOL outcome measures with smaller effect size in β (approximately of half value compared to that of postoperative BMI). In addition, coefficient of determination R2, which indicates the aggregated impact of body weight loss and low postoperative BMI on the QOL, were relatively small for each QOL outcome measures.
Table 5

Impact of postoperative lower body mass index and body weight loss on the quality of life (multiple regression analysis)

VariablesAbility for working
Dissatisfaction with symptoms
Dissatisfaction at the meals
Dissatisfaction at working
Dissatisfaction for daily life subscale
PCS
MCS
βP valueβP valueβP valueβP valueβP valueβP valueβP value
Postoperative BMI (kg/m2)-0.134< 0.0001-0.189< 0.00010.216< 0.0001-0.185< 0.0001-0.231< 0.00010.148< 0.00010.109< 0.0001
Change in body weight (%)(-0.081)0.0018(-0.073)0.0040-0.112< 0.001(-0.097)<0.0001-0.109< 0.0001(0.047)0.066(0.025)NS
R2 (P value)0.031< 0.00010.048< 0.00010.073< 0.0010.054< 0.00010.080< 0.00010.028< 0.0001(0.014)< 0.0001

BMI: Body mass index; QOL: Quality of life; PCS: Physical component summary; MCS: Mental component summary.

Table 6

Regression analysis of effect size

The interpretation of effect sizeβR2
None-very small< (0.100)< (0.020)
Small> 0.100> 0.020
Medium> 0.300> 0.130
Large> 0.500> 0.260
Impact of postoperative lower body mass index and body weight loss on the quality of life (multiple regression analysis) BMI: Body mass index; QOL: Quality of life; PCS: Physical component summary; MCS: Mental component summary. Regression analysis of effect size

DISCUSSION

This study identified the causal factors affecting body weight loss after gastrectomy and investigated the impact of body weight loss on the postoperative QOL using the PGSAS-45 questionnaire, which was recently developed to assess the QOL following gastrectomy. Our results identified higher preoperative BMI as the most influential factor affecting postoperative weight loss, followed by the type of gastrectomy performed (TGRY) and female sex, in order of significance. Moreover, the patients with higher BMI (> 25 kg/m2) preoperatively exhibited the largest postoperative weight loss among three relevant preoperative BMI groups. The patients with low postoperative BMI experienced worse QOL than those with greater body weight loss, though the aggregated impact of low BMI and excess body weight loss on the QOL postoperatively was relatively smaller than generally considered. Loss of body weight after gastrectomy is thought to be caused by multiple factors, including decreased serum ghrelin[15], reduced food intake due to various abdominal symptoms, and disorder of digestive and absorptive function due to pancreatic exocrine insufficiency or postcibal pancreaticobilliary asynchrony. The degree of weight loss was also affected by the type of gastrectomy employed[15-19]. Additionally, body weight loss is also related to tumor progression or chemotherapy after surgery. In this study, we focused on Stage I patients in order to exclude the influence of other factors that may influence the postoperative body weight, and to isolate the effect of the surgical procedures. The findings of present study that patients undergoing TGRY had a greater body weight loss compared to those undergoing DGBI or DGRY were compatible with the previous reports[19,20]. However, the influence of the other surgical procedures such as laparoscopic approach or preservation of celiac branch of vagus, which maintains the postprandial motility of the duodenum and jejunum[21] and attenuates a dumping syndrome[22], were insignificant as for effect size, β. Recent analyzes of specific disease processes, including sarcopenia and metabolic diseases, have identified the importance of evaluating not only BMI but also body component composition, such as body fat and skeletal muscle[23-26]. Siervo et al[27] also reported that body composition varies with BMI, age and sex. Although a significant reduction in body fat has been reported after gastrectomy, several studies indicated that the reduction in skeletal muscle mass was smaller than reductions in the volume of body fat[28-31]. These previous findings may, in part, explain the smaller body weight loss in patients with low BMI (< 18.5), in which, the proportion of the skeletal muscle supposed to be larger than those of the other relevant preoperative BMI groups. Body weight loss is considered to be one of the objective index which resulting in worse QOL after gastrectomy[5,8,32,33], and also loss of body weight is associated with intolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy[34]. However, in clinical setting, excess body weight loss is not always accompanied with worse QOL, therefore, precise features of the impact of body weight loss on the postoperative QOL should be investigated. For this purpose, we studied the impact of body weight loss as well as postoperative BMI on the postgastrectomy QOL using the PGSAS-45 questionnaire, which is the first questionnaire developed to specifically measure QOL in gastrectomized patients[11,35-38], by multiple regression analysis. The results of our study demonstrated that the preoperative BMI rather than the degree of body weight loss was the most influential predictor of worse QOL after gastrectomy. The low postoperative BMI significantly affected on all QOL outcome measures, though the body weight loss only affected few QOL outcome measures with smaller effect size in terms of β. The aggregated impact of low BMI and body weight loss was unexpectedly small for each QOL outcome measures in terms of R2. There may be other factors influencing worse QOL postgastrectomy, and future work should focus on investigation of other possible factors. Despite above mentioned results, both to maintain postoperative body weight and to avoid low BMI seem yet important for better QOL after gastrectomy, therefore, enhanced perioperative nutritional management should be required particularly in patients with low preoperative BMI. Several limitations of our study should be acknowledged. This study was not a prospective study and the investigation was performed at a single point in time postoperatively. We focused on long-term QOL, more than 1 year after gastrectomy based on previous findings that most QOL measures are stable at > 1 year postoperatively[39]. However, such QOL measurements at a single point in time may be insufficient to reflect the true impact of body weight loss. Further prospective and chronological studies assessing QOL over short- and longer-term periods after gastrectomy are required.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank all of the physicians who participated in this study and the patients whose cooperation made it possible.

COMMENTS

Background

Body weight loss, a common complaint after gastrectomy, is likely associated with various factors such as tumor progression and chemotherapy. While several reports indicated that the type of gastrectomy may be a determinant of postoperative weight loss, other risk factors have yet to be determined. In the present study, they focused only on patients with Stage I gastric cancer, so as to evaluate the impact of the surgical procedure without the confounding effect of other factors.

Research frontiers

Previous reports indicated that the type of gastrectomy is a certain postoperative weight loss, suggesting that total gastrectomy resulted in greater weight loss. Additionally, patients with excess weight loss after gastrectomy were shown to have lower performance status and difficulty in continuing chemotherapy. However, few reports have analyzed the relationship between postgastrectomy body weight loss and quality of life (QOL).

Innovations and breakthroughs

The authors aimed to determine the predictive factors and clarify the quality-of-life impact of postgastrectomy body weight loss and low body mass index. For this purpose, the authors used the postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale-45, which was established specifically to evaluate QOL following gastrectomy. Interestingly, the authors found that postoperative body mass index, rather than the degree of weight loss, was a predictor of worse QOL after gastrectomy, but the effect was relatively mild.

Applications

To minimize the negative effects on QOL after gastrectomy, it is better to maintain the postoperative body weight and avoid low body mass index. Postgastrectomy syndrome is a group of disorders and complications following gastrectomy. It includes early/late dumping syndrome, reflux gastritis, diarrhea, anemia, malabsorption, reflux gastritis, and weight loss.

Peer-review

The authors have conducted a well-written observational study. The case enrollment and variable choices were appropriate. Despite this study has the limit that QOL measures are conducted only at a single point after surgery, it has some new insights.
  38 in total

1.  Associations among exercise, body weight, and quality of life in a population-based sample of endometrial cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kerry S Courneya; Kristina H Karvinen; Kristin L Campbell; Robert G Pearcey; George Dundas; Valerie Capstick; Katia S Tonkin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Characteristics and clinical relevance of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45: newly developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients.

Authors:  Koji Nakada; Masami Ikeda; Masazumi Takahashi; Shinichi Kinami; Masashi Yoshida; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Yoshiyuki Kawashima; Atsushi Oshio; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Masanori Terashima; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  End results of gastrectomy for gastric cancer: effect of extensive lymph node dissection.

Authors:  M Mine; S Majima; M Harada; S Etani
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Body composition in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Daniela Gologanu; Diana Ionita; Teodora Gartonea; Cristina Stanescu; Miron Alexandru Bogdan
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-03

5.  Prevalence of sarcopenia and predictors of skeletal muscle mass in healthy, older men and women.

Authors:  Michele Iannuzzi-Sucich; Karen M Prestwood; Anne M Kenny
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Assessment of quality of life after gastrectomy using EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22.

Authors:  Daisuke Kobayashi; Yasuhiro Kodera; Michitaka Fujiwara; Masahiko Koike; Goro Nakayama; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Evaluation of postgastrectomy symptoms after distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45).

Authors:  Kazunari Misawa; Masanori Terashima; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Shuichi Ota; Hiroaki Hata; Hiroshi Noro; Kentaro Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Yajima; Toshikatsu Nitta; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Changes of quality of life in gastric cancer patients after curative resection: a longitudinal cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Ae Ran Kim; Juhee Cho; Yea-Jen Hsu; Min Gew Choi; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Young Ho Yun; Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Beyond the body mass index: tracking body composition in the pathogenesis of obesity and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  M J Müller; M Lagerpusch; J Enderle; B Schautz; M Heller; A Bosy-Westphal
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.213

10.  Quality of life after gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Dennis Graham; Mithat Gönen; Vivian E Strong; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of postgastrectomy symptoms and daily lives of small remnant distal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer using a large-scale questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Masazumi Takahashi; Shinichi Kinami; Junya Fujita; Takahisa Suzuki; Akihiro Suzuki; Toshiyuki Tanahashi; Yoshihiko Kawaguchi; Atsushi Oshio; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-12-15

2.  Analysis of factors contributing to postoperative body weight change in patients with gastric cancer: based on generalized estimation equation.

Authors:  Qiuju Tian; Liyuan Qin; Weiyi Zhu; Shaojie Xiong; Beiwen Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Nutritional and Clinical Factors Affecting Weight and Fat-Free Mass Loss after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hee-Sook Lim; Bora Lee; In Cho; Gyu Seok Cho
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Impact of body mass index on quality of life after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ki Bum Park; Byunghyuk Yu; Ji Yeon Park; Oh Kyoung Kwon; Wansik Yu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  Risks and benefits of additional surgery for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach meeting non-curative resection criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Sin Hye Park; Hong Man Yoon; Keun Won Ryu; Young-Woo Kim; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Bang Wool Eom
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.253

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.