Literature DB >> 26821959

Triple-Loaded Single-Row Versus Suture-Bridge Double-Row Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma Fibrin Membrane: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

F Alan Barber1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the structural healing and clinical outcomes of triple-loaded single-row with suture-bridging double-row repairs of full-thickness rotator cuff tendons when both repair constructs are augmented with platelet-rich plasma fibrin membrane.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, consecutive series of patients diagnosed with full-thickness rotator cuff tears no greater than 3 cm in anteroposterior length were treated with a triple-loaded single-row (20) or suture-bridging double-row (20) repair augmented with platelet-rich plasma fibrin membrane. The primary outcome measure was cuff integrity by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary clinical outcome measures were American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Rowe, Simple Shoulder Test, Constant, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores.
RESULTS: The mean MRI interval was 12.6 months (range, 12-17 months). A total of 3 of 20 single-row repairs and 3 of 20 double-row repairs (15%) had tears at follow-up MRI. The single-row group had re-tears in 1 single tendon repair and 2 double tendon repairs. All 3 tears failed at the original attachment site (Cho type 1). In the double-row group, re-tears were found in 3 double tendon repairs. All 3 tears failed medial to the medial row near the musculotendinous junction (Cho type 2). All clinical outcome measures were significantly improved from the preoperative level (P < .0001), but there was no statistical difference between groups postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no MRI difference in rotator cuff tendon re-tear rate at 12 months postsurgery between a triple-loaded single-row repair or a suture-bridging double-row repair when both are augmented with platelet-rich plasma fibrin membrane. No difference could be demonstrated between these repairs on clinical outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, Prospective randomized study.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26821959     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  10 in total

1.  What is wrong in comparison of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears?

Authors:  Alper Deveci
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-07

2.  Preliminary Results of a Consecutive Series of Large & Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Treated with Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs Augmented with Extracellular Matrix.

Authors:  Paolo Consigliere; Ioannis Polyzois; Tanaya Sarkhel; Rohit Gupta; Ofer Levy; A Ali Narvani
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-01

Review 3.  Do functional outcomes and cuff integrity correlate after single- versus double-row rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Mohamed H Sobhy; Ahmed Hany Khater; Medhat Ragab Hassan; Ossama El Shazly
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-13

4.  Postoperative residual pain is associated with a high magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based signal intensity of the repaired supraspinatus tendon.

Authors:  Hong Li; Yuzhou Chen; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Statistical Fragility of Single-Row Versus Double-Row Anchoring for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Nathan P Fackler; Cooper B Ehlers; Kylie T Callan; Arya Amirhekmat; Eric J Smith; Robert L Parisien; Dean Wang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 6.  Current Clinical Recommendations for Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma.

Authors:  Adrian D K Le; Lawrence Enweze; Malcolm R DeBaun; Jason L Dragoo
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-12

Review 7.  The Role of Biologic Therapy in Rotator Cuff Tears and Repairs.

Authors:  Michael D Charles; David R Christian; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 8.  A comparison of simple and complex single-row versus transosseous-equivalent double-row repair techniques for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil Ponugoti; Aashish Raghu; Henry B Colaco; Henry Magill
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-10-26

9.  Increased acromiohumeral distance in a double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery compared to a single-row surgery after 12 months.

Authors:  Kaya Turan; Haluk Çabuk; Cenk Köroğlu; Çağatay Öztürk
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Healing Rates and Functional Outcomes After Triple-Loaded Single-Row Versus Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Erin K Granger; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.