Literature DB >> 26821623

Cyclosporine A in Reperfused Myocardial Infarction: The Multicenter, Controlled, Open-Label CYCLE Trial.

Filippo Ottani1, Roberto Latini2, Lidia Staszewsky3, Luigi La Vecchia4, Nicola Locuratolo5, Marco Sicuro6, Serge Masson3, Simona Barlera3, Valentina Milani3, Mario Lombardi7, Alessandra Costalunga8, Nadia Mollichelli9, Andrea Santarelli10, Nicoletta De Cesare11, Paolo Sganzerla12, Alberto Boi13, Aldo Pietro Maggioni14, Ugo Limbruno15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether cyclosporine A (CsA) has beneficial effects in reperfused myocardial infarction (MI) is debated.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether CsA improved ST-segment resolution in a randomized, multicenter phase II study.
METHODS: The authors randomly assigned 410 patients from 31 cardiac care units, age 63 ± 12 years, with large ST-segment elevation MI within 6 h of symptom onset, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0 to 1 in the infarct-related artery, and committed to primary percutaneous coronary intervention, to 2.5 mg/kg intravenous CsA (n = 207) or control (n = 203) groups. The primary endpoint was incidence of ≥70% ST-segment resolution 60 min after TIMI flow grade 3. Secondary endpoints included high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) on day 4, left ventricular (LV) remodeling, and clinical events at 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Time from symptom onset to first antegrade flow was 180 ± 67 min; a median of 5 electrocardiography leads showed ST-segment deviation (quartile [Q]1 to Q3: 4 to 6); 49.8% of MIs were anterior. ST-segment resolution ≥70% was found in 52.0% of CsA patients and 49.0% of controls (p = 0.55). Median hs-cTnT on day 4 was 2,160 (Q1 to Q3: 1,087 to 3,274) ng/l in CsA and 2,068 (1,117 to 3,690) ng/l in controls (p = 0.85). The 2 groups did not differ in LV ejection fraction on day 4 and at 6 months. Infarct site did not influence CsA efficacy. There were no acute allergic reactions or nonsignificant excesses of 6-month mortality (5.7% CsA vs. 3.2% controls, p = 0.17) or cardiogenic shock (2.4% CsA vs. 1.5% controls, p = 0.33).
CONCLUSIONS: In the CYCLE (CYCLosporinE A in Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, a single intravenous CsA bolus just before primary percutaneous coronary intervention had no effect on ST-segment resolution or hs-cTnT, and did not improve clinical outcomes or LV remodeling up to 6 months. (CYCLosporinE A in Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction [CYCLE]; NCT01650662; EudraCT number 2011-002876-18).
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute myocardial infarction; echocardiography; left ventricular function; troponins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26821623     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  48 in total

1.  In vitro Models of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Timothy Chen; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 2.  Intensive care for human hearts in pluripotent stem cell models.

Authors:  Pelin Golforoush; Michael D Schneider
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 3.  The Role for Cardiovascular Remodeling in Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors:  Nishant Krishna Sekaran; Anna Lisa Crowley; Fernanda Rodrigues de Souza; Elmiro Santos Resende; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Clinical effects of cyclosporine A on reperfusion injury in myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chen Yingzhong; Cai Lin; Wang Chunbin
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-19

5.  Therapeutic hypothermia in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a long way to go.

Authors:  Luca Liberale; Fabrizio Montecucco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Cardioprotective Effects of HSP72 Administration on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Takashi Tanimoto; Missag H Parseghian; Takehiro Nakahara; Hideki Kawai; Navneet Narula; Dongbin Kim; Robert Nishimura; Richard H Weisbart; Grace Chan; Richard A Richieri; Nezam Haider; Farhan Chaudhry; Glenn T Reynolds; John Billimek; Francis G Blankenberg; Partho P Sengupta; Artiom D Petrov; Takashi Akasaka; H William Strauss; Jagat Narula
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  The coronary circulation in acute myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury: a target for cardioprotection.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; William Chilian; Filippo Crea; Sean M Davidson; Peter Ferdinandy; David Garcia-Dorado; Niels van Royen; Rainer Schulz; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Human Tissue-Engineered Model of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Timothy Chen; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 9.  Targeting mitochondria for cardiovascular disorders: therapeutic potential and obstacles.

Authors:  Massimo Bonora; Mariusz R Wieckowski; David A Sinclair; Guido Kroemer; Paolo Pinton; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 10.  Targeting mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in heart failure: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Ligia Akemi Kiyuna; Rudá Prestes E Albuquerque; Che-Hong Chen; Daria Mochly-Rosen; Julio Cesar Batista Ferreira
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 7.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.