Literature DB >> 26821318

Familiar environments enhance object and spatial memory in both younger and older adults.

Niamh A Merriman1, Jan Ondřej2, Eugenie Roudaia1, Carol O'Sullivan2, Fiona N Newell3.   

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that familiarity with an environment may protect against spatial memory decline for familiar objects in older adults. We investigated whether a familiar context also reduces age-related decline in spatial memory for novel objects. Twenty-four younger and 23 older participants viewed a virtual rendering of a local environment along two different routes, each through a well-known (West) or lesser-known (East) area within the environment. Older and younger participants reported being more familiar with one (i.e. West) area than the other. In each trial, participants were presented with one route and were instructed to learn ten novel objects and their locations along the route. Following learning, participants immediately completed five test blocks: an object recognition task, an egocentric spatial processing (direction judgement) task, an allocentric spatial processing (proximity judgement) task and two pen-and-paper tests to measure cognitive mapping abilities. First we found an age effect with worse performance by older than younger adults in all spatial tasks, particularly in allocentric spatial processing. However, our results suggested better memory for objects and directions, but not proximity judgements, when the task was associated with more familiar than unfamiliar contexts, in both age groups. There was no benefit of context when a separate young adult group (N = 24) was tested, who reported being equally familiar with both areas. These results suggest an important facilitatory role of context familiarity on object recognition, and in particular egocentric spatial memory, and have implications for enhancing spatial memory in older adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; Familiarity context effects; Recognition; Spatial navigation; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26821318     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4557-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  79 in total

1.  Age-related changes in object processing and contextual binding revealed using fMR adaptation.

Authors:  Michael W L Chee; Joshua O S Goh; Vinod Venkatraman; Jiat Chow Tan; Angela Gutchess; Brad Sutton; Andy Hebrank; Eric Leshikar; Denise Park
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Whitney E Parker; Alana M Feiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Age effects on wayfinding and route learning skills.

Authors:  Denise Head; Marlisa Isom
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Age-related differences in an ecologically based study of route learning.

Authors:  S M Wilkniss; M G Jones; D L Korol; P E Gold; C A Manning
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-06

6.  Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: cortical afferents.

Authors:  W A Suzuki; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  The spatial scaffold: The effects of spatial context on memory for events.

Authors:  Jessica Robin; Jordana Wynn; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Effects of age on navigation strategy.

Authors:  M Kirk Rodgers; Joseph A Sindone; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  How schema and novelty augment memory formation.

Authors:  Marlieke T R van Kesteren; Dirk J Ruiter; Guillén Fernández; Richard N Henson
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Aging specifically impairs switching to an allocentric navigational strategy.

Authors:  Mathew A Harris; Jan M Wiener; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.750

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Topographical disorientation in aging. Familiarity with the environment does matter.

Authors:  Antonella Lopez; Alessandro O Caffò; Andrea Bosco
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Centella asiatica increases hippocampal synaptic density and improves memory and executive function in aged mice.

Authors:  Nora E Gray; Jonathan A Zweig; Maya Caruso; Marjoen D Martin; Jennifer Y Zhu; Joseph F Quinn; Amala Soumyanath
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Scenes facilitate associative memory and integration.

Authors:  Jessica Robin; Rosanna K Olsen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The Road More Travelled: The Differential Effects of Spatial Experience in Young and Elderly Participants.

Authors:  Antonella Lopez; Alessandro Germani; Luigi Tinella; Alessandro Oronzo Caffò; Albert Postma; Andrea Bosco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  "CityQuest," A Custom-Designed Serious Game, Enhances Spatial Memory Performance in Older Adults.

Authors:  Niamh A Merriman; Eugenie Roudaia; Jan Ondřej; Matteo Romagnoli; Ivan Orvieto; Carol O'Sullivan; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.