Literature DB >> 26821080

A Confirmatory Analysis of Item Reliability Trends (CAIRT): Differentiating True Score and Error Variance in the Analysis of Item Context Effects.

Johannes Hartig1, Britta Hölzel2, Helfried Moosbrugger3.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown increasing item reliabilities as an effect of the item position in personality scales. Traditionally, these context effects are analyzed based on item-total correlations. This approach neglects that trends in item reliabilities can be caused either by an increase in true score variance or by a decrease in error variance. This article presents the Confirmatory Analysis of Item Reliability Trends (CAIRT) that allows estimating both trends separately within a structural equation modeling framework. Results of a simulation study prove the CAIRT method to provide reliable and independent parameter estimates; the power exceeds the analysis of item-total correlations. We present an empirical application to self- and peer ratings collected in an Internet-based experiment. Results show that reliability trends are caused by increasing true score variance in self-ratings and by decreasing error variance in peer ratings.

Year:  2007        PMID: 26821080     DOI: 10.1080/00273170701341266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  2 in total

1.  Is the Factor Observed in Investigations on the Item-Position Effect Actually the Difficulty Factor?

Authors:  Karl Schweizer; Stefan Troche
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Do Adaptive Representations of the Item-Position Effect in APM Improve Model Fit? A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Florian Zeller; Dorothea Krampen; Siegbert Reiß; Karl Schweizer
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.821

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.