Literature DB >> 26819266

What Predicts an Advanced-Stage Diagnosis of Breast Cancer? Sorting Out the Influence of Method of Detection, Access to Care, and Biologic Factors.

Joseph Lipscomb1, Steven T Fleming2, Amy Trentham-Dietz3, Gretchen Kimmick4, Xiao-Cheng Wu5, Cyllene R Morris6, Kun Zhang7, Robert A Smith8, Roger T Anderson9, Susan A Sabatino10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have yielded important findings regarding the determinants of an advanced-stage diagnosis of breast cancer. We seek to advance this line of inquiry through a broadened conceptual framework and accompanying statistical modeling strategy that recognize the dual importance of access-to-care and biologic factors on stage.
METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Breast and Prostate Cancer Data Quality and Patterns of Care Study yielded a seven-state, cancer registry-derived population-based sample of 9,142 women diagnosed with a first primary in situ or invasive breast cancer in 2004. The likelihood of advanced-stage cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer IIIB, IIIC, or IV) was investigated through multivariable regression modeling, with base-case analyses using the method of instrumental variables (IV) to detect and correct for possible selection bias. The robustness of base-case findings was examined through extensive sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS: Advanced-stage disease was negatively associated with detection by mammography (P < 0.001) and with age < 50 (P < 0.001), and positively related to black race (P = 0.07), not being privately insured [Medicaid (P = 0.01), Medicare (P = 0.04), uninsured (P = 0.07)], being single (P = 0.06), body mass index > 40 (P = 0.001), a HER2 type tumor (P < 0.001), and tumor grade not well differentiated (P < 0.001). This IV model detected and adjusted for significant selection effects associated with method of detection (P = 0.02). Sensitivity analyses generally supported these base-case results.
CONCLUSIONS: Through our comprehensive modeling strategy and sensitivity analyses, we provide new estimates of the magnitude and robustness of the determinants of advanced-stage breast cancer. IMPACT: Statistical approaches frequently used to address observational data biases in treatment-outcome studies can be applied similarly in analyses of the determinants of stage at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(4); 613-23. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26819266     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  7 in total

1.  Medical costs of treating breast cancer among younger Medicaid beneficiaries by stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Justin G Trogdon; Donatus U Ekwueme; Diana Poehler; Cheryll C Thomas; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; Benjamin T Allaire
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Determinants of stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Nigerian women: sociodemographic, breast cancer awareness, health care access and clinical factors.

Authors:  Elima Jedy-Agba; Valerie McCormack; Oluwole Olaomi; Wunmi Badejo; Monday Yilkudi; Terna Yawe; Emmanuel Ezeome; Iliya Salu; Elijah Miner; Ikechukwu Anosike; Sally N Adebamowo; Benjamin Achusi; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Clement Adebamowo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Impact of Urban Neighborhood Disadvantage on Late Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Virginia.

Authors:  Pam Baker DeGuzman; Wendy F Cohn; Fabian Camacho; Brandy L Edwards; Vanessa N Sturz; Anneke T Schroen
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  White-Black Differences in Cancer Incidence, Stage at Diagnosis, and Survival Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; James L Fisher; Ryan D Baltic; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2017-03-21

5.  Geographic Disparities in Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis Rates and Their Persistence Over Time.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Florence K L Tangka; Zahava Berkowitz; Jacqueline Miller; Ingrid J Hall; Manxia Wu; Susan A Sabatino
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Impact of Patient Navigation on Population-Based Breast Screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Lei Huang; Jie Liu; Xia Li; Aisha Ajmal; Maryam Ajmal; Yunjin Yao; Li Tian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 6.473

7.  Drivers of advanced stage at breast cancer diagnosis in the multicountry African breast cancer - disparities in outcomes (ABC-DO) study.

Authors:  Fiona McKenzie; Annelle Zietsman; Moses Galukande; Angelica Anele; Charles Adisa; Groesbeck Parham; Leeya Pinder; Herbert Cubasch; Maureen Joffe; Frederick Kidaaga; Robert Lukande; Awa U Offiah; Ralph O Egejuru; Aaron Shibemba; Joachim Schuz; Benjamin O Anderson; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 7.396

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.