Jane Carlisle Maxwell1, Bruce Mendelson. 1. Center for Social Work Research (JCM); Denver Office of Drug Strategy, 1200 Federal Boulevard, Denver, Colorado (BM).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study presents information on the status and impact of medical and legalized marijuana, and the latest data on attitudes and prevalence of use since implementation of these laws. Recent reports from epidemiologists in Denver and Seattle are summarized to give the readers a sense of the changes as these laws have taken effect in their communities. METHODS: The status of these laws is reviewed and the results of surveys taken before and after the laws were enacted are presented, along with data on changing potency and driving under the influence of marijuana. SUMMARY: Prevalence of use by youths has not increased, but their negative attitudes towards the risk of using marijuana have decreased, and use by adults has increased. Potency continues to increase, as has the proportion of drivers testing positive for use of the drug. Data from Denver show increases in hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and calls to poison centers, with decreasing arrests and admissions to substance abuse treatment programs. Data from the Seattle area show similar decreases in treatment admissions and police involvement, but also increased prevalence of more frequent use. CONCLUSIONS: Current data suggest that increases in marijuana use preceded legalization in 2012. Treatment admissions were declining before these laws, but some indicators of morbidity seem to be increasing subsequent to legalization, with modest increases in poison center calls in both states and increases in acute medical visits in Denver. Data are needed to understand the relationship between the patterns and amounts of use in terms of consequences, and data on the health conditions of those receiving medical marijuana and the impact of higher potency.
OBJECTIVES: This study presents information on the status and impact of medical and legalized marijuana, and the latest data on attitudes and prevalence of use since implementation of these laws. Recent reports from epidemiologists in Denver and Seattle are summarized to give the readers a sense of the changes as these laws have taken effect in their communities. METHODS: The status of these laws is reviewed and the results of surveys taken before and after the laws were enacted are presented, along with data on changing potency and driving under the influence of marijuana. SUMMARY: Prevalence of use by youths has not increased, but their negative attitudes towards the risk of using marijuana have decreased, and use by adults has increased. Potency continues to increase, as has the proportion of drivers testing positive for use of the drug. Data from Denver show increases in hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and calls to poison centers, with decreasing arrests and admissions to substance abuse treatment programs. Data from the Seattle area show similar decreases in treatment admissions and police involvement, but also increased prevalence of more frequent use. CONCLUSIONS: Current data suggest that increases in marijuana use preceded legalization in 2012. Treatment admissions were declining before these laws, but some indicators of morbidity seem to be increasing subsequent to legalization, with modest increases in poison center calls in both states and increases in acute medical visits in Denver. Data are needed to understand the relationship between the patterns and amounts of use in terms of consequences, and data on the health conditions of those receiving medical marijuana and the impact of higher potency.
Authors: Ryan Vandrey; Jeffrey C Raber; Mark E Raber; Brad Douglass; Cameron Miller; Marcel O Bonn-Miller Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Jun 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Penny F Whiting; Robert F Wolff; Sohan Deshpande; Marcello Di Nisio; Steven Duffy; Adrian V Hernandez; J Christiaan Keurentjes; Shona Lang; Kate Misso; Steve Ryder; Simone Schmidlkofer; Marie Westwood; Jos Kleijnen Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Jun 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jonathan M Davis; Bruce Mendelson; Jay J Berkes; Katie Suleta; Karen F Corsi; Robert E Booth Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jessica B Hancock-Allen; Lisa Barker; Michael VanDyke; Dawn B Holmes Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Hannah Carliner; Pia M Mauro; Qiana L Brown; Dvora Shmulewitz; Reanne Rahim-Juwel; Aaron L Sarvet; Melanie M Wall; Silvia S Martins; Geoffrey Carliner; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Emily J Cox; Neha Maharao; Gabriela Patilea-Vrana; Jashvant D Unadkat; Allan E Rettie; Jeannine S McCune; Mary F Paine Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Anne Campbell; Steffani R Bailey; Kim A Hoffman; Javier Ponce-Terashima; Katie Fankhauser; Miguel Marino; Dennis McCarty Journal: J Psychoactive Drugs Date: 2020-04-15
Authors: Aaron L Sarvet; Melanie M Wall; Katherine M Keyes; Magdalena Cerdá; John E Schulenberg; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Andrea H Weinberger; Lauren R Pacek; Melanie M Wall; Michael J Zvolensky; Jan Copeland; Sandro Galea; Shadi Nahvi; Scott J Moeller; Deborah S Hasin; Renee D Goodwin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jessica L Braymiller; Loren D Masters; Ashley N Linden-Carmichael; Stephanie T Lanza Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 5.012