Literature DB >> 26818509

Variability in Dopamine Genes Dissociates Model-Based and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning.

Bradley B Doll1, Kevin G Bath2, Nathaniel D Daw3, Michael J Frank4.   

Abstract

Considerable evidence suggests that multiple learning systems can drive behavior. Choice can proceed reflexively from previous actions and their associated outcomes, as captured by "model-free" learning algorithms, or flexibly from prospective consideration of outcomes that might occur, as captured by "model-based" learning algorithms. However, differential contributions of dopamine to these systems are poorly understood. Dopamine is widely thought to support model-free learning by modulating plasticity in striatum. Model-based learning may also be affected by these striatal effects, or by other dopaminergic effects elsewhere, notably on prefrontal working memory function. Indeed, prominent demonstrations linking striatal dopamine to putatively model-free learning did not rule out model-based effects, whereas other studies have reported dopaminergic modulation of verifiably model-based learning, but without distinguishing a prefrontal versus striatal locus. To clarify the relationships between dopamine, neural systems, and learning strategies, we combine a genetic association approach in humans with two well-studied reinforcement learning tasks: one isolating model-based from model-free behavior and the other sensitive to key aspects of striatal plasticity. Prefrontal function was indexed by a polymorphism in the COMT gene, differences of which reflect dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex. This polymorphism has been associated with differences in prefrontal activity and working memory. Striatal function was indexed by a gene coding for DARPP-32, which is densely expressed in the striatum where it is necessary for synaptic plasticity. We found evidence for our hypothesis that variations in prefrontal dopamine relate to model-based learning, whereas variations in striatal dopamine function relate to model-free learning. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Decisions can stem reflexively from their previously associated outcomes or flexibly from deliberative consideration of potential choice outcomes. Research implicates a dopamine-dependent striatal learning mechanism in the former type of choice. Although recent work has indicated that dopamine is also involved in flexible, goal-directed decision-making, it remains unclear whether it also contributes via striatum or via the dopamine-dependent working memory function of prefrontal cortex. We examined genetic indices of dopamine function in these regions and their relation to the two choice strategies. We found that striatal dopamine function related most clearly to the reflexive strategy, as previously shown, and that prefrontal dopamine related most clearly to the flexible strategy. These findings suggest that dissociable brain regions support dissociable choice strategies.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/361211-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; dopamine; genetics; reinforcement learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26818509      PMCID: PMC4728725          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1901-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  71 in total

1.  Multiple memory systems as substrates for multiple decision systems.

Authors:  Bradley B Doll; Daphna Shohamy; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy of the new selective COMT inhibitors.

Authors:  P T Männistö; S Kaakkola
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  DARPP-32, a phosphoprotein enriched in dopaminoceptive neurons bearing dopamine D1 receptors: distribution in the cerebral cortex of the newborn and adult rhesus monkey.

Authors:  B Berger; A Febvret; P Greengard; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  A mechanistic account of striatal dopamine function in human cognition: psychopharmacological studies with cabergoline and haloperidol.

Authors:  Michael J Frank; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Extracellular concentrations of dopamine and metabolites in the rat caudate after oral administration of a novel catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor Ro 40-7592.

Authors:  E Acquas; E Carboni; R H de Ree; M Da Prada; G Di Chiara
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.372

6.  Opponent actor learning (OpAL): modeling interactive effects of striatal dopamine on reinforcement learning and choice incentive.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibition improves set-shifting performance and elevates stimulated dopamine release in the rat prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  E M Tunbridge; D M Bannerman; T Sharp; P J Harrison
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Bradley B Doll; Dylan A Simon; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Model-based learning protects against forming habits.

Authors:  Claire M Gillan; A Ross Otto; Elizabeth A Phelps; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 10.  Goals and habits in the brain.

Authors:  Ray J Dolan; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Age-related variability in decision-making: Insights from neurochemistry.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; William J Jagust; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Domain-Specific Working Memory, But Not Dopamine-Related Genetic Variability, Shapes Reward-Based Motor Learning.

Authors:  Peter Holland; Olivier Codol; Elizabeth Oxley; Madison Taylor; Elizabeth Hamshere; Shadiq Joseph; Laura Huffer; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Contribution of explicit processes to reinforcement-based motor learning.

Authors:  Peter Holland; Olivier Codol; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Is impaired dopaminergic function associated with mobility capacity in older adults?

Authors:  Simon Moskowitz; David W Russ; Leatha A Clark; Nathan P Wages; Dustin R Grooms; Adam J Woods; Julie Suhr; Janet E Simon; Andrew O'Shea; Cody R Criss; Paolo Fadda; Brian C Clark
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 7.713

5.  Interactions Among Working Memory, Reinforcement Learning, and Effort in Value-Based Choice: A New Paradigm and Selective Deficits in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Matthew A Albrecht; James A Waltz; James M Gold; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Working Memory Load Strengthens Reward Prediction Errors.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Brittany Ciullo; Michael J Frank; David Badre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Dopamine enhances model-free credit assignment through boosting of retrospective model-based inference.

Authors:  Lorenz Deserno; Rani Moran; Jochen Michely; Ying Lee; Peter Dayan; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Improving the Reliability of Computational Analyses: Model-Based Planning and Its Relationship With Compulsivity.

Authors:  Vanessa M Brown; Jiazhou Chen; Claire M Gillan; Rebecca B Price
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-01-13

Review 9.  Substance use is associated with reduced devaluation sensitivity.

Authors:  Kaileigh A Byrne; A Ross Otto; Bo Pang; Christopher J Patrick; Darrell A Worthy
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Dopamine and Proximity in Motivation and Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Michael Frank
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.