Tarun Jindal1. 1. Consultant, Department of Urology, SSTC , Firozabad, India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Exposure to radiation is a hazard and precautions are necessary to limit it. This study was done to assess the knowledge of radiation and the attitude towards radio-protection among urology residents in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to assess the knowledge and attitude of urology residents who came from all over the country to attend a clinical meeting at Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, India. RESULTS: All the respondents agreed to being exposed to radiation, with 78.2% using radiation in more than five cases a week. Only 65.2% always took some steps for radio-protection. Lead aprons and thyroid shields were the most common radiation protection devices used. None of the residents ever used lead gloves or protective eye glasses or dosimeters. An 82.6% felt that they did not have adequate knowledge, 85.4% of residents did not receive any formal classes regarding the risk of radiation, 21.7% either rarely or never moved out of the operating room when the radiation was being used, 42.4% did not know that the SI unit of the equivalent absorbed dose of radiation & 52.1% did not know about the amount of radiation delivered to an adult during a contrast enhanced CT scan of the abdomen. CONCLUSION: Results of the present study reveal that the urology residents of India lack knowledge about the risks of radiation exposure. Majority of them did not take necessary precautions to limit their exposure to radiation.
INTRODUCTION: Exposure to radiation is a hazard and precautions are necessary to limit it. This study was done to assess the knowledge of radiation and the attitude towards radio-protection among urology residents in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to assess the knowledge and attitude of urology residents who came from all over the country to attend a clinical meeting at Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, India. RESULTS: All the respondents agreed to being exposed to radiation, with 78.2% using radiation in more than five cases a week. Only 65.2% always took some steps for radio-protection. Lead aprons and thyroid shields were the most common radiation protection devices used. None of the residents ever used lead gloves or protective eye glasses or dosimeters. An 82.6% felt that they did not have adequate knowledge, 85.4% of residents did not receive any formal classes regarding the risk of radiation, 21.7% either rarely or never moved out of the operating room when the radiation was being used, 42.4% did not know that the SI unit of the equivalent absorbed dose of radiation & 52.1% did not know about the amount of radiation delivered to an adult during a contrast enhanced CT scan of the abdomen. CONCLUSION: Results of the present study reveal that the urology residents of India lack knowledge about the risks of radiation exposure. Majority of them did not take necessary precautions to limit their exposure to radiation.
Authors: Manuel Ritter; Patrick Krombach; Andreas Martinschek; Fabian P Siegel; Martin Schmitt; Christel Weiss; Axel Häcker; Alexandre E Pelzer Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Ariella A Friedman; Khurshid R Ghani; James O Peabody; Alan Jackson; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jack S Elder Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Seth A Cohen; Sriram S Rangarajan; Tony Chen; Kerrin L Palazzi; J Scott Langford; Roger L Sur Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Jennifer O'Sullivan; Owen J O'Connor; Kevin O'Regan; Bronagh Clarke; Louise N Burgoyne; Max F Ryan; Michael M Maher Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2010-03-03