Literature DB >> 26816657

Nomogram Estimating the Probability of Intraabdominal Abscesses after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Bang Wool Eom1, Jungnam Joo2, Young-Woo Kim1, Boram Park2, Hong Man Yoon1, Keun Won Ryu1, Soo Jin Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intraabdominal abscess is one of the most common reasons for re-hospitalization after gastrectomy. This study aimed to develop a model for estimating the probability of intraabdominal abscesses that can be used during the postoperative period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 1,564 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2010 and 2012. Twenty-six related markers were analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop the probability estimation model for intraabdominal abscess. Internal validation using a bootstrap approach was employed to correct for bias, and the model was then validated using an independent dataset comprising of patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2008 and March 2010. Discrimination and calibration abilities were checked in both datasets.
RESULTS: The incidence of intraabdominal abscess in the development set was 7.80% (122/1,564). The surgical approach, operating time, pathologic N classification, body temperature, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, glucose level, and change in the hemoglobin level were significant predictors of intraabdominal abscess in the multivariate analysis. The probability estimation model that was developed on the basis of these results showed good discrimination and calibration abilities (concordance index=0.828, Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-statistic P=0.274). Finally, we combined both datasets to produce a nomogram that estimates the probability of intraabdominal abscess.
CONCLUSIONS: This nomogram can be useful for identifying patients at a high risk of intraabdominal abscess. Patients at a high risk may benefit from further evaluation or treatment before discharge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal abscess; Nomograms; Postoperative complications; Stomach neoplasms

Year:  2015        PMID: 26816657      PMCID: PMC4723303          DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.4.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1598-1320            Impact factor:   3.720


  36 in total

1.  A nomogram to calculate the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM).

Authors:  D J Williams; J D Walker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy.

Authors:  K M Kim; J Y An; H I Kim; J H Cheong; W J Hyung; S H Noh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Comparison of individual surgeon's performance. Risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system.

Authors:  P M Sagar; M N Hartley; J MacFie; B A Taylor; G P Copeland
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy--Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501.

Authors:  Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Atsushi Nashimoto; Akira Kurita; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Taira Kinoshita; Kuniyoshi Arai; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kunio Okajima
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Diagnostic and prognostic prediction using gene expression profiles in high-dimensional microarray data.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Outcomes of Critical Pathway in Laparoscopic and Open Surgical Treatments for Gastric Cancer Patients: Patients Selection for Fast-Track Program through Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Ji Woo Choi; Yi Xuan; Hoon Hur; Cheul Su Byun; Sang-Uk Han; Yong Kwan Cho
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  2 in total

1.  C-reactive protein can be an early predictor of postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Hyun Woo Yim; Cho Hyun Park; Kyo Young Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Risk Factors for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Submucosal Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Kurumi Tsuchihashi; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Shiki Fujino; Masatoshi Kitakaze; Masayuki Ohue; Katsuki Danno; Itsuko Nakamichi; Kenji Ohshima; Eiichi Morii; Mamoru Uemura; Yuichiro Doki; Hidetoshi Eguchi
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2022-07-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.